Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

UPDATE: Coin got BB'd. - I think I made a mistake cracking this one out - AU58 US-Philippines 1915-S

I am preparing a new submission to PCGS, and since I can't group cross-overs with raw coins in one submission, I decided to crack out my NCG AU58 1915-S US-Philippines Centavo so that I could photograph it before sending it in to PCGS for grading. This is THE key date, and I hoped it would cross as AU58. Now, I'm not so sure. Perhaps it will get AU55, or God forbid lower.

I welcome others opinions. Here are the images after cracking it out.

image

Comments

  • Options
    1960NYGiants1960NYGiants Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭✭
    I dunno about '58 but I see green spots on the piece and parallel lines (cleaning?) running from 1 to 7 o'clock. It may get "Genuine".

    edit to add:
    Try that acetone bath you did on the other piece. If any of the lustre remains and pops out like the other it may make it back into a 58 holder.
    Gene

    Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
    Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

    Collector of:
    Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
    Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
    My Ebay
  • Options
    ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    I'm thinking you made a mistake on this one..... I'm seeing the same lines 1960nygiants is seeing... Also looks like some verdigris or pvc on it... I will wish you good luck and I hope it comes out to your favor!
  • Options
    WWWWWW Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭
    Looks like it has a decent shot at an AU58, and I would not mess with it at all.
    You live by the crack out and you die by the crack out, nothing is certain there.
    Especially with copper at PCGS. Besides, what have you got to lose now?
  • Options
    There's no PVC - I already used acetone on it, and there's no residual luster left.

    The green spots appear to me to be verdigris, but I'm sort of worried that if I use olive oil to loosen it, there may be pitting beneath, so I think I'll leave it.

    The hairlines are not from a cleaning, in my opinion, but from friction wear, since there's so much accumulation in the crevasses, and if someone had attempted to clean it, surely they would not have left it so crusty.

    Though it clearly has the details of an AU58 coin, my own belief is that other problems will keep it from getting anything higher than AU53.

    I think there's a remote chance PCGS won't grade it.

    Hopefully, I am being objective, rather than my judgment being clouded by my wishes, but this is really depressing.
  • Options
    FilamCoinsFilamCoins Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭

    That's funny. Before I read your comments, I was thinking 53 due to wear and ugly spots. I agree with the others that there's a 50/50 chance of bagging for corrosion and/or and old wipe. BTW, I'm heading back to the Phils next month for another work assigment. Looking forward to attending the monthly auctions and collecting raw again after a 3 year hiatus!

  • Options


    << <i>That's funny. Before I read your comments, I was thinking 53 due to wear and ugly spots. I agree with the others that there's a 50/50 chance of bagging for corrosion and/or and old wipe. BTW, I'm heading back to the Phils next month for another work assigment. Looking forward to attending the monthly auctions and collecting raw again after a 3 year hiatus! >>

    I'm starting to think I'll be happy if it simply gets a grade of AU50, but if it isn't BB'd then I suspect it would at least make AU53, based upon the appearance of a couple PCGS AU50's that I've seen.
    jetblack740il's PCGS AU50 for sale
    PhilippineCoins.com's PCGS AU50 for sale
    Realistically, a 50/50 chance of being BB'd is probably a good prediction (for environmental damage?), but the hairlines seen in the image are much more pronounced than when the coin is viewed in hand. Damn!image

    I doubt I'd know results before you get back from the Philippines, but if it gets BB'd, I might ask you to keep your eye out for a nice raw 1915-S for me.image
  • Options
    TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,541 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmm... I'd have to go with a "Genuine" designation. PCGS has been all over the board with hairlines recently. I'd say 60/40 chance.
  • Options
    I see a nice raw one has appeared on ebay, so now I'm figuring just how substantial a snipe bid I can afford to place. Crossing my fingers.
  • Options
    HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    My gut instinct is "Genuine" designation by PCGS for the hairlines, sorry.
  • Options
    My vote is genuine as well. But I wish you the best of luck on this one...
    Jim
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 22,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I did not vote but I think you need to prepare your consession speech

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    Based on the photo provided, I would have to agree with everyone "genuine". Good luck!
    jetblack740il

    ==================================

    Complete US-PHIL Coins for Sale, Circulation Strikes 1903-1945
  • Options
    sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500
    I think you are correct, ouch

    did the thick NGC plastic cover up the wipe?
  • Options
    A refreshingly honest ebay seller of the 1915-S US-PI Centavo I was considering in order to replace this disaster responded to my query regarding HIS OPINION on whether the coin could get certified, and he frankly told me that he didn't think so, even though he had to know I would be much less likely to bid. His honesty somewhat offsets my disappointment at my probably having to wait a looong time before another shows up on ebay in the AU55 to MS61 range. I don't care to own a lower grade and I cannot afford a higher one.

    I decided to use olive oil to remove the verdigris, and it does indeed look better now, but still not good enough. I have to vacate for a few days for termite fumigation starting tomorrow, (bummer and a major hassle), which seem to prove the expression "when it rains, it pours"!image

    Edited to answer the previous question: The old NGC slab was so badly scuffed, scratched and a bit hazy, I didn't notice the problems before cracking it out.
  • Options
    Last month I sent this coin and another 1915-S Centavo to PCGS for grading. I just received both back, and this one got body bagged 92 Cleaned, while the other coin received an AU55 designation.

    Lesson learned. Never break a coin out to be graded by another service unless you're okay with it possibly ending up with the "Genuine Not Gradable" moniker. image

    I'll probably end up listing it on eBay, (with full disclosure and a link to this forum post), even though I probably could get more money by simply listing it without any background history whatsoever. I can't bring myself to compromise my integrity for financial gain.

    This was the coin photographed through the original badly scratched NGC holder.
    image
  • Options

    Too bad. It's a lovely specimen of a hard date. I hope for your sake you get your grade. Good luck.

    Just having fun in Bangkok
    Jefferson nickels, Standing Libs, and US-Philippines rock
Sign In or Register to comment.