Home U.S. Coin Forum

The silver lining in PCGS's copper policy.

LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,656 ✭✭✭✭✭
I've suspected for a long time that some high end copper has been undergraded simply because of the potential liability to PCGS.

Now, for instance, Blay's 1877 "Indian Princess" can be put in the 67R holder it properly deserves! image
"My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.

Comments

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've suspected for a long time that some high end copper has been undergraded simply because of the potential liability to PCGS.

    Now, for instance, Blay's 1877 "Indian Princess" can be put in the 67R holder it properly deserves! image >>



    Because it has been recolored? imageimage
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,789 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is it CAC'ed? image

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I've suspected for a long time that some high end copper has been undergraded simply because of the potential liability to PCGS. Now, for instance, Blay's 1877 "Indian Princess" can be put in the 67R holder it properly deserves! image >>

    Because it has been recolored? imageimage >>



    I don't think that is the implication. Natural red coins eventually turn too. I don't know the coin in question but if it is just a few percent north of RB then I can see the concern when the price difference here is 5 digits. --Jerry
  • IGWTIGWT Posts: 4,975
    That's all well and good. But what's the copper lining in the silver policy? image
  • droopyddroopyd Posts: 5,381 ✭✭✭
    I guess it remains to be seen whether PCGS will loosen up its recent grading tightness on "questionable color" coppers.

    I have a number of PCGS graded Lincolns, none of which have turned in the holders, and all but a couple of them have been holdered for at least a year.
    Me at the Springfield coin show:
    image
    60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I disagree with the OP. The way I read the change in policy, PCGS no longer guarantees the COLOR on new coins or transferred coins after 1/1/2010. I believe PCGS does still guarantee the GRADE of all coins, including copper. So yeah, PCGS may be able to loosen up on the color designations on close coins if it is no longer financially liable for the designation, but I do believe they are still on the hook for the grade they assign a coin. Would like to hear what PCGS thinks on this though since if a 66RD copper grows spots, the grade AND color will likely downgrade. So would they still compensate for the decrease in grade, but not the decrease in color???
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,287 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>So would they still compensate for the decrease in grade, but not the decrease in color??? >>



    Interesting question, indeed. I am glad you brought it up.
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I assume you mean if it develops corrosive spots, that would affect the surface quality and the resulting grade. Much like milkspots on ASE's. Cheers, RickO
  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,656 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, that is an interesting but different question which is oblique to what I was thinking.

    That is, under the old policy, if a beautiful original red $250K 67R coin became a beautiful 67RB but 50K coin, that was a BIG liability. That liability is greatly diminished under the new policy.

    As a result, the indian princess, for example, is alot more likey now to upgrade than previously.
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.

  • I always found interesting what QDB has stated many times: "Most early Lincolns that are full red are doctored".

    Mr. Bowers reiterates this several times in different books.

    The story of the same early Lincoln's going from RB to RD after a good Doctor worked'em is a great one.

    100 year old copper is not supposed to be full RD. The premiums for these have been too high for too long.
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,410 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>That's all well and good. But what's the copper lining in the silver policy? image >>



    image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,656 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Was re-reading the LloydMinny post from 2005......no longer a problem. image

    "1922 NO D, with a 64RD and a 65RB. I told him they both looked the same to me. He agreed. I told him so many of his doubles looked like they could upgrade. Response: "PCGS is afraid of me!!!". I knew what he meant. Upgrading and increasing the value of some of these to boost the guarantee clause, gives PCGS a headache when Stewart is walking near their booths!!! "
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • BWRCBWRC Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Well, that is an interesting but different question which is oblique to what I was thinking.

    That is, under the old policy, if a beautiful original red $250K 67R coin became a beautiful 67RB but 50K coin, that was a BIG liability. That liability is greatly diminished under the new policy.

    As a result, the indian princess, for example, is alot more likey now to upgrade than previously. >>




    image
    Brian Wagner Rare Coins, Specializing in PCGS graded, Shield, Liberty and Buffalo Nickels varieties.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Perhaps I'm getting a bit cynical after this announcement, but this sure looks like a convenient justification for gradeflation, and I can't envision an upside.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • This content has been removed.
  • RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,152 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've suspected for a long time that some high end copper has been undergraded simply because of the potential liability to PCGS.

    Now, for instance, Blay's 1877 "Indian Princess" can be put in the 67R holder it properly deserves! image >>




    I think this is true. PCGS can now grade coins for what they are rather than the potential liability they may present.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file