Home U.S. Coin Forum

Grading Buffer Nicks...Learning

I'm building a circulated grading set of Buffalo Nickels.

I found this one in an old box of circulated material. So, it will be the first example for my grading set (ANA Grading Standards, 6th ed.).

I've always had difficulty in grading this series, so I would like to see what the forum thinks.

My grade is F-15. Is this a fair assessment for this coin?



image


imageimage
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111

Comments

  • gyocomgdgyocomgd Posts: 2,582 ✭✭✭
    Yup, F-15 sounds right on.
    This will sound simplistic, but here goes: As a rule, the lower the grade, the more onus you put on the horn. This thing has roughly half a horn, so F-15 it is....
    image
  • F15 is a good call. Though you'll probably see slabbed VFs that look very similar.

    Mojo
    "I am the wilderness that is lost in man."
    -Jim Morrison-
    Mr. Mojorizn

    my blog:www.numistories.com
  • gyocomgdgyocomgd Posts: 2,582 ✭✭✭


    << <i>F15 is a good call. Though you'll probably see slabbed VFs that look very similar.
    Mojo >>



    Agreed...if it were an 8/7 and in my possession, I might lobby hard for low VF.image
    image
  • LRCTomLRCTom Posts: 857 ✭✭✭
    On a P-mint like that, yes, F-12 or F-15. If that were a date that comes weakly struck (25-D, 26-S, etc.) it would probably slab VF.

    ..Tom

    LRC Numismatics eBay listings:
    http://stores.ebay.com/lrcnumismatics

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agreed, that is a fair grade based on the photograph... Interesting task you have set for yourself... how detailed will your set be? Cheers, RickO


  • << <i>Agreed, that is a fair grade based on the photograph... Interesting task you have set for yourself... how detailed will your set be? Cheers, RickO >>




    AG, G, VG, F, VF-20, VF-30,XF-40, XF-45, AU50, AU55, AU58...as the initial set. Maybe expand to mid-grades (G-6, F-15, VF-20, etc.) at some point.

    11 coins using the ANA Grading Standards as the guide. All common coins as would like to do this on the cheap.


    It is interesting that someone above noted that the 1915 that I originially posted may be considered a "VF" if the date was one notorious for a weak strike. I always thought that technical grading was about the wear on the coin and not the stirke. This is not to minimize the importance of strike, because it is extremely important and desirable. Just that the strength of strike, or lack there of, is what differentiates one XF40 coin from another.
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    As a neat experiment, why doesn't the OP compare his coin to the coins in Photograde and come up with his own assessment?

    As for me, that coin looks like a VF20.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • ecichlidecichlid Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭
    25 Years ago, that was an F-12. Now, a VF-20.
    There is no "AT" or "NT". We only have "market acceptable" or "not market acceptable.
  • zeebobzeebob Posts: 2,825
    I came up with F-15 then read the replies. I'm sticking with F-15.
  • gyocomgdgyocomgd Posts: 2,582 ✭✭✭
    I've reconsidered. I see it as F-18.5
    image
  • capecape Posts: 1,621
    F-12 AT BEST
    ed rodrigues

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file