I dont know. I see lots of ticks on both coins. MS68? Dont think so. Not my series but a 68 should be pretty close to perfect and those coins are not by a long shot.
Not my coins but I'd like to have them. I don't think they're overgraded based on apparent marks as far as luster goes you can't tell from those photos.
These have been on TT for quite a while. The ms68 79-s apparently did sell for $5000 2 months ago. The 79-s and 80-p were auctioned by Heritage a year ago and realized much lower prices (you can view their photos for a photography comparison with TT). I added an ms67 79-p Wide Rim to my set this year and am on pace to tie for the #2 registry set (I have 81-p in ms67 too). I would love to have these ms68's but only if they are true ms68s. I would not buy from TT knowing their awful return privilege. I am collecting the finest coins and not the finest slab numbers.
<< <i>I would only grade those coins as MS-66 at best.
The bid should then be priced at that level. >>
I have owned 6 NGC MS66 I won from TT and these are a lot nicer than the MS 66's I won. I sold 4 of them a few years back, a they sold for between $225 and up to around $300. Mine were all 1981's.
I would not buy from TT knowing their awful return privilege.
????????????
TT has about the easiset return policy out there. You don't need a reason. Call them up, find out whose attention to send it to, mark return on the packing slip and put it in the mail.
Its tough to evaluate luster from photos but you can certainly see marks and those coins have a lot of them. Doesnt PCGS have standards for the different MS levels? If they do how can these coins be 68?
<< <i>I would not buy from TT knowing their awful return privilege.
????????????
TT has about the easiset return policy out there. You don't need a reason. Call them up, find out whose attention to send it to, mark return on the packing slip and put it in the mail. >>
<< <i>I've looked thru many of SBA Dollars and I hope these look better in hand than the pix.... >>
I don't believe you'd have to look at even 100 1980 mint sets to find a better '80-P. It shouldn't take many more than a 100 sets to find a better '80-S.
This one might not even be a mint set coin considering the strike deficiencies.
I hate to trash other peoples' coins but am very unimpressed by this one.
Iv'e seen many rolls from banks that were passed into circulation by me with luster and minor nicks that were probably equal or close to those...It's hard to judge by pictures..
<< <i>Iv'e seen many rolls from banks that were passed into circulation by me with luster and minor nicks that were probably equal or close to those...It's hard to judge by pictures.. >>
From the picture it's a little below what I'd bother to save. I'm assuming the luster is good.
In its defence though I go more with strike quality than being clean and this one is clean enough to be a keeper.
SBA's were considered dogs.The prices on these have been suprisingly spiking.I had lost some interest in them but kept ane eye on them from time to time.I liked them origanally....!!!
<< <i>SBA's were considered dogs.The prices on these have been suprisingly spiking.I had lost some interest in them but kept ane eye on them from time to time.I liked them origanally....!!! >>
I liked them at first when I thought they were going to circulate.
I lost a lot of interest when that failed to materialize. They're fun to look for in nice shape though since some (like the '81-S) are among the lowest quality of all moderns.
Comments
what should they go for?
commoncents123, JrGMan2004, Coll3ctor (2), Dabigkahuna, BAJJERFAN, Boom, GRANDAM, newsman, cohodk, kklambo, seateddime, ajia, mirabela, Weather11am, keepdachange, gsa1fan, cone10
-------------------------
as well as some flat areas in the hair.Somewhat
modest luster. Not that thrilled with the 99 either
at that rarefied grade.
Camelot
GrandAm
But I wasn't that high of a bidder
<< <i>1980 PCGS MS68 SBA Pop 2
PCGS 1999 P MS68 SBA Pop 6
Wonder what the 1980 will go for? >>
Are these your coins?
The name is LEE!
now that's modern crap
The bid should then be priced at that level.
Camelot
<< <i>I would only grade those coins as MS-66 at best.
The bid should then be priced at that level. >>
I like it
evaluation and then act upon that opinion.
Camelot
I wouldn't give either of them more than MS67.
Perhaps we do not agree, but that is the real world we are talking
about. It is, what it is. The really top, world class collections, always
reflect the collectors high standards for the coin and the grade, regardless
what the market place may dictate. This care and attention to details, always
pays off, when the collection comes up for auction or sale.
Camelot
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 700
Camelot
<< <i>I would only grade those coins as MS-66 at best.
The bid should then be priced at that level. >>
I have owned 6 NGC MS66 I won from TT and these are a lot nicer than the MS 66's I won. I sold 4 of them a few years back, a they sold for between $225 and up to around $300. Mine were all 1981's.
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
????????????
TT has about the easiset return policy out there. You don't need a reason. Call them up, find out whose attention to send it to, mark return on the packing slip and put it in the mail.
there is a pretty hefty restocking fee.
Camelot
I just got my TT winnings!
Now I have to send them back.
<< <i>I would only grade those coins as MS-66 at best.
The bid should then be priced at that level. >>
Wow grading high grade coins from teletrade pics, interesting.
It is no longer a game, it is a necessity. Nothing is ever as good,
as the human eye holding the actual coin. But, we all do the best
we can, under the circumstances we find ourselves in.
Camelot
<< <i>When you bid on Teletrade, you must grade from pictures.
It is no longer a game, it is a necessity. Nothing is ever as good,
as the human eye holding the actual coin. But, we all do the best
we can, under the circumstances we find ourselves in. >>
I was being sarcastic
<< <i>
<< <i>I would only grade those coins as MS-66 at best.
The bid should then be priced at that level. >>
Wow grading high grade coins from teletrade pics, interesting. >>
Are you being sarcastic, funny or merely confused?
Camelot
<< <i>I would not buy from TT knowing their awful return privilege.
????????????
TT has about the easiset return policy out there. You don't need a reason. Call them up, find out whose attention to send it to, mark return on the packing slip and put it in the mail. >>
Problem is, I'm not sure that returns are "free"
<< <i>I've looked thru many of SBA Dollars and I hope these look better in hand than the pix....
I don't believe you'd have to look at even 100 1980 mint sets to find a better '80-P. It
shouldn't take many more than a 100 sets to find a better '80-S.
This one might not even be a mint set coin considering the strike deficiencies.
I hate to trash other peoples' coins but am very unimpressed by this one.
<< <i>Iv'e seen many rolls from banks that were passed into circulation by me with luster and minor nicks that were probably equal or close to those...It's hard to judge by pictures.. >>
From the picture it's a little below what I'd bother to save. I'm assuming the luster is good.
In its defence though I go more with strike quality than being clean and this one is clean enough to be a keeper.
<< <i>SBA's were considered dogs.The prices on these have been suprisingly spiking.I had lost some interest in them but kept ane eye on them from time to time.I liked them origanally....!!! >>
I liked them at first when I thought they were going to circulate.
I lost a lot of interest when that failed to materialize. They're fun to look for in nice shape though
since some (like the '81-S) are among the lowest quality of all moderns.