Need help grading 1932 washington quarter

JOZ · August 26, 2009 10:48AM

Hi, Just wanted feedback and help grading this coin. Thanks

PCcoins · August 26, 2009 10:53AM

Tough to grade from your images.

But the rainbow toning is very nice so I think pcgs will grade it ms65.

Now send it to me, please!

Raybo · August 26, 2009 11:07AM

I like it!

lkeigwin · August 26, 2009 11:30AM

I grade it blurry. Better pictures, please.

It's a shame that there's a fair likelihood it will grade "genuine" with PCGS, simply because of its color.
Lance.

cone10 · August 26, 2009 11:38AM

It's hard to tell from your photo's but there looks like a few hits on the eagles breast on reverse... MS 63

nankraut · August 26, 2009 11:59AM

Looks like nice natural toning to me; MS-64 or 65?

dpoole · August 26, 2009 12:10PM

Pretty. Hits on the rev hurt. 64 or 65, like my predecessor says.

ponderit · August 26, 2009 12:22PM

That's a pretty coin. 64 or 65?

cuzzx · August 26, 2009 12:29PM

Please forgive me here as I do not understand why people place a photo of a coin on these sites and ask others to grade there coin.
First off the people on these sites are not graders/slabers. Do we do this to show off a coin. Do we do this thinking about sending it in to be graded.

I'm not a bad or rude guy, I just don't understand. When I don't understand I ask. I buy a coin that I like and I do not really care if you like my coin or not. I might show it off, but probably not as I really do not want people knowing what I have.

Like I said, I just do not get this.

As for the coin, quarter. It looks real good, toned BU. As for a number I can't give as I do not grade. And I have seen graded coins that I wonder about.

Please don't shoot me or run me off, just help me to learn.

morgandollar1878 · August 26, 2009 12:32PM

Obviouly the pictures are blurry, but from what I see with the contact marks on the obverse and reverse it is no better than a 63. I do like the toning, it looks to be NT. If you can get better pics, I would be able to give you a little better judgement on the toning.

illini420 · August 26, 2009 12:33PM

63 because of the hits, maybe 64 if the graders bump it for the toning but I wouldn't bank on it.

LotsoLuck · August 26, 2009 12:34PM

I think this is a great place to "show off" your coins. Its a place where people talk coins. Coin collecting is a lonely hobby, either the people you know could care less or there are the people you'd rather not show anything valuable to. JMO

Btw...Beauty Washington. My stab is a MS64

Edited for bad spelling.

Connecticoin · August 26, 2009 12:36PM

AT. Please send to me for proper conservation.

Actually, looks like a beautifully toned MS-65.

DenverDave · August 26, 2009 1:03PM

Very nice @ 64 with a shot at 65...

ponderit · August 26, 2009 1:07PM

<< I think this is a great place to "show off" your coins. Its a place where people talk coins. Coin collecting is a lonely hobbie, either the people you know could care less or there are the people you'd rather not show anything valuable to. JMO

Btw...Beauty Washington. My stab is a MS64 >>

Well said!

LotsoLuck · August 26, 2009 1:51PM

And....as far as coins are concerned...I dont know what I would do with out this whacky place...just another IMO

TomB · August 26, 2009 1:55PM

The luster looks good, but the toning has an odd feel to it that might be due to the lighting. I would guess MS64/65.

beartracks42 · August 26, 2009 1:57PM

<< 63 because of the hits, maybe 64 if the graders bump it for the toning but I wouldn't bank on it. >>

JOZ · August 26, 2009 2:07PM

I don't post very often but I will do so from now on and thanks for all the feedback.

There is plenty more coins I would like to share in the near future. The reason I like this

forum is because I get to see coins I don't have or might not be able to afford. It is really

nice that people come together for a hobby and share experiences, knowledge and their

coins. Thanks

Bear · August 26, 2009 2:21PM

It is a beautiful quarter. The face seems

quite free of marks and flatness. The marks

on the eagle, will probably pull it down to MS-65.

Of course, there is an outside shot at a 66.

Boom · August 27, 2009 12:04AM

Nice coin!

As stated on countless occassion, it's impossible to determine grade from ANY picture.

Can't distinguish luster but toning appears to be correct - commencing with 3rd side (rim).

Given what we CAN see, it appears to be from the same die - precursor to the 34 Light Motto.

Numerous hits & dings considered, I'm guessing 63. 64 topside. Looks nice.

Good luck getting it graded.

Let us know if you get it done.

09sVDB · August 27, 2009 8:02AM

I like the LOOK but hard to tell with the toning. My first thought was MS65

Bear · August 27, 2009 8:03AM

Boy, this is a really tough crowd.

Batman23 · August 27, 2009 8:07AM

<< Boy, this is a really tough crowd. >>

I thought it was a generous crowd. I was thinking MS63 because of all those hits.

That said, it is a very nice looking quarter

derryb · August 27, 2009 8:12AM

65, long shot at 66

Bruceswar · August 27, 2009 8:46AM

<< 

<< Boy, this is a really tough crowd. >>

I thought it was a generous crowd. I was thinking MS63 because of all those hits.

That said, it is a very nice looking quarter

>>

Please send me all your qtrs that look like this at MS 63 levels. MS 63 really?? Is that a joke? This coin is MS 65 all day long.

Bruceswar · August 27, 2009 8:46AM

<< 63 because of the hits, maybe 64 if the graders bump it for the toning but I wouldn't bank on it. >>

Please send me all coins that look like this at MS63 levels. This coin is MS65 all day long.

veryfine · August 27, 2009 8:49AM

<< Boy, this is a really tough crowd. >>

I agree.
This looks like a solid 65 to me.

JRocco · August 27, 2009 1:28PM

Very nice quarter.
65 obverse, 64 reverse so I grade it a 64, but a nice high 64.

Need help grading 1932 washington quarter

Comments

Leave a Comment