Home U.S. Coin Forum

Need help grading 1932 washington quarter

Hi, Just wanted feedback and help grading this coin. Thanks

image

image

image

image

Comments

  • PCcoinsPCcoins Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭
    Tough to grade from your images.

    But the rainbow toning is very nice so I think pcgs will grade it ms65.

    Now send it to me, please! image
    "It is what it is."
  • RayboRaybo Posts: 5,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it! image
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I grade it blurry. Better pictures, please.

    It's a shame that there's a fair likelihood it will grade "genuine" with PCGS, simply because of its color.
    Lance.
  • It's hard to tell from your photo's but there looks like a few hits on the eagles breast on reverse... MS 63
    A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore.
    Yogi Berra

  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    Looks like nice natural toning to me; MS-64 or 65?image
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • dpooledpoole Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Pretty. Hits on the rev hurt. 64 or 65, like my predecessor says.
  • ponderitponderit Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's a pretty coin. 64 or 65? image
    Successful BST transactions with Rob41281, crazyhounddog, Commoncents, CarlWohlford, blu62vette, Manofcoins, Monstarcoins, coinlietenant, iconbuster, RWW,Nolawyer, NewParadigm, Flatwoods, papabear, Yellowkid, Ankur, Pccoins, tlake22, drddm, Connecticoin, Cladiator, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty
  • Please forgive me here as I do not understand why people place a photo of a coin on these sites and ask others to grade there coin.
    First off the people on these sites are not graders/slabers. Do we do this to show off a coin. Do we do this thinking about sending it in to be graded.

    I'm not a bad or rude guy, I just don't understand. When I don't understand I ask. I buy a coin that I like and I do not really care if you like my coin or not. I might show it off, but probably not as I really do not want people knowing what I have.

    Like I said, I just do not get this.

    As for the coin, quarter. It looks real good, toned BU. As for a number I can't give as I do not grade. And I have seen graded coins that I wonder about.

    Please don't shoot me or run me off, just help me to learn.
  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Obviouly the pictures are blurry, but from what I see with the contact marks on the obverse and reverse it is no better than a 63. I do like the toning, it looks to be NT. If you can get better pics, I would be able to give you a little better judgement on the toning.
    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63 because of the hits, maybe 64 if the graders bump it for the toning but I wouldn't bank on it.
  • LotsoLuckLotsoLuck Posts: 3,786 ✭✭✭
    I think this is a great place to "show off" your coins. Its a place where people talk coins. Coin collecting is a lonely hobby, either the people you know could care less or there are the people you'd rather not show anything valuable to. JMO

    Btw...Beauty Washington. My stab is a MS64

    Edited for bad spelling.
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AT. Please send to me for proper conservation. image

    Actually, looks like a beautifully toned MS-65.


  • Very nice @ 64 with a shot at 65...

    My Ebay Auctions

    Currently Listed: Nothing

    Take Care, Dave
  • ponderitponderit Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think this is a great place to "show off" your coins. Its a place where people talk coins. Coin collecting is a lonely hobbie, either the people you know could care less or there are the people you'd rather not show anything valuable to. JMO

    Btw...Beauty Washington. My stab is a MS64 >>



    Well said!
    Successful BST transactions with Rob41281, crazyhounddog, Commoncents, CarlWohlford, blu62vette, Manofcoins, Monstarcoins, coinlietenant, iconbuster, RWW,Nolawyer, NewParadigm, Flatwoods, papabear, Yellowkid, Ankur, Pccoins, tlake22, drddm, Connecticoin, Cladiator, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty
  • LotsoLuckLotsoLuck Posts: 3,786 ✭✭✭
    And....as far as coins are concerned...I dont know what I would do with out this whacky place...just another IMO image
  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,939 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The luster looks good, but the toning has an odd feel to it that might be due to the lighting. I would guess MS64/65.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image


  • << <i>63 because of the hits, maybe 64 if the graders bump it for the toning but I wouldn't bank on it. >>



    image
    Gary
    image
  • I don't post very often but I will do so from now on and thanks for all the feedback.

    There is plenty more coins I would like to share in the near future. The reason I like this

    forum is because I get to see coins I don't have or might not be able to afford. It is really

    nice that people come together for a hobby and share experiences, knowledge and their

    coins. Thanks
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    It is a beautiful quarter. The face seems

    quite free of marks and flatness. The marks

    on the eagle, will probably pull it down to MS-65.

    Of course, there is an outside shot at a 66.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • BoomBoom Posts: 10,165
    Nice coin!

    As stated on countless occassion, it's impossible to determine grade from ANY picture.

    Can't distinguish luster but toning appears to be correct - commencing with 3rd side (rim).

    Given what we CAN see, it appears to be from the same die - precursor to the 34 Light Motto.

    Numerous hits & dings considered, I'm guessing 63. 64 topside. Looks nice.

    Good luck getting it graded.

    Let us know if you get it done. image
  • 09sVDB09sVDB Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭
    I like the LOOK but hard to tell with the toning. My first thought was MS65
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Boy, this is a really tough crowd.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Boy, this is a really tough crowd. >>



    I thought it was a generous crowd. I was thinking MS63 because of all those hits.

    That said, it is a very nice looking quarterimage


  • << <i>

    << <i>Boy, this is a really tough crowd. >>



    I thought it was a generous crowd. I was thinking MS63 because of all those hits.

    That said, it is a very nice looking quarterimage >>



    Please send me all your qtrs that look like this at MS 63 levels. MS 63 really?? Is that a joke? This coin is MS 65 all day long.


  • << <i>63 because of the hits, maybe 64 if the graders bump it for the toning but I wouldn't bank on it. >>



    Please send me all coins that look like this at MS63 levels. This coin is MS65 all day long.
  • veryfineveryfine Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Boy, this is a really tough crowd. >>


    I agree.
    This looks like a solid 65 to me.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice quarter.
    65 obverse, 64 reverse so I grade it a 64, but a nice high 64.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file