I read the description so didn't bid but, I almost jumped on this 4 card 52 Bowman Color lot

SirAnthonyAC · July 14, 2009 1:29PM

I read the description so didn't bid but, I almost jumped on this 4 card 52 Bowman Color lot.

I understand you have to read the fine print, and I did but, does anyone else find this just a wee bit deceptive?

What 'looks like' a 4 card lot

Edited to add:

I was scrolling through auctions looking for lots, seeing single card after single card and then I saw 4 old cards with a buy it now of $55, well, I clicked it with excitement to get a close look at the cards.

I saw they weren't creased or dinged up, then I reread the title and saw the description and was.... well disappointed. The image of 4 cards drew me in only to find out the auction was only for one.

Dboneesq · July 14, 2009 1:32PM

Fine Print? Just read the TITLE of the auction. MANY sellers list more than one card in the photo ... saves a lot of time. I don't think it's deceptive at all. JMO.

hammered · July 14, 2009 1:43PM

Those are really great detailed scans

otwcards · July 14, 2009 1:44PM

Deceptive? Fine print? What did the auction title say? Rizzuto! Nowhere did it say that the other three cards were included. This has been the norm and if you were unsure, a simple click of the "Ask Seller a Question" would've been fine.

I've known Michael for years and he's ALWAYS been above board and there was nothing deceptive about the auction or the listing. Perhaps you should pause for a moment before slapping accusations around that are only the result of you not paying attention. Even after reflecting on the auction, you still described it incorrectly. It IS NOT a 4 card 52 Bowman Color lot. And ALL of the cards from 1952 were color. The cards pictured were a '52 Topps, two '52 Bowman and 1 1953 Bowman Color.

SirAnthonyAC · July 14, 2009 1:50PM

Sorry guys and I don't mean to offend you but, I still think you should have a photo of the one item you are selling, the picture makes it look like a 4 card lot.

otwcards · July 14, 2009 1:59PM

<< <i>Sorry guys and I don't mean to offend you but, I still think you should have a photo of the one item you are selling, the picture makes it look like a 4 card lot. >>

No offense taken, but the accusation about Sirrius may be offensive.

There are many, many, many sellers that use multiple images in their auctions. It is a time saving method as well as a way to cross-promote their other listings.

If the auction title weren't specific, then I would be in complete agreement. But the title was specific.

BTW, I appreciate sellers that put up quality scans of cards they are offering, especially when they are raw!

WinPitcher · July 15, 2009 12:17AM

Not only is it not deceptive it actually is a good listing.

The title AND the description clearly state it is for one card.

Steve

coachh · July 15, 2009 12:24AM

Looks like a good listing to me. I have seen several like this and I like them. They allow me to see what else a seller has available.

lsutigers1973 · July 15, 2009 12:27AM

Any card I list that has multiple cards in the photo, the first part of the item description I always put "You are only bidding on the card in the title".

PowderedH2O · July 15, 2009 1:59AM

I agree. I think the listing is superb and the pics are big and you can see what you are getting. I have run numerous auctions with four pics with the same words "You are bidding only for the card listed". I wish all sellers posted pics this great.

minnesotahusker · July 15, 2009 3:32AM

Now a deceptive listing is one where the title says you are bidding on a PSA 9 card, when in fact you are bidding on a PSA 9 card with a qualifier!!!

CNote · July 15, 2009 3:35AM

The listing is fine, IMO.

And, whoever made the comment about listing a 9, and it having qualifiers and failing to mention it in the description or listing...yeah, that's slimey.

fiveniner · July 15, 2009 8:43AM

Very Clear No deception at all.This dealer also has very good integrity.

CDsNuts · July 15, 2009 8:46AM

My assumption before reading the fine print was that I'd be receiving a complete 52 Bowman color and black and white set, as well as a 1955 Topps set in NM/MT.

SirAnthonyAC · July 15, 2009 9:13AM

<< <i>My assumption before reading the fine print was that I'd be receiving a complete 52 Bowman color and black and white set, as well as a 1955 Topps set in NM/MT. >>

Funny

But when you're scrolling through auctions looking for lots, seeing single card after single card and then you see 4 old cards with a buy it now of $55, well, I clicked it with excitement to get a close look at the cards.

I saw they weren't creased or dinged up, then I reread the title and saw the description and was.... well disappointed. The image of 4 cards drew me in only to find out the auction was only for one.

PoppaJ · July 15, 2009 9:52AM

<< <i>Sorry guys and I don't mean to offend you but, I still think you should have a photo of the one item you are selling, the picture makes it look like a 4 card lot. >>

////////////////////////////////

Hi SirAnthonyAC,

I have to admit that when I first saw auctions like that, years ago, it was a bit confusing too. But, like others have said, it's a very common practice nowadays. In fact, if I see a multiple pic while scanning through auctions, I almost automatically figure it's for one card.

What really pisses me off are sellers that list graded cards that have qualifiers which aren't disclosed in the auction title. I know I've clicked on THIS BIN a couple of times in the past few days! Some don't mind .... Personally, it turns me away!

Take care,
PoppaJ

iamthegreatcornholio · July 15, 2009 10:59AM

Grouping scans not only saves time, but it also advertises your other cards.

Gonblott · July 15, 2009 11:11AM

<< <i>Now a deceptive listing is one where the title says you are bidding on a PSA 9 card, when in fact you are bidding on a PSA 9 card with a qualifier!!! >>

I agree!

I read the description so didn't bid but, I almost jumped on this 4 card 52 Bowman Color lot

Comments