How old is this fingerprint? (Crazy explanation added at end)
messydesk
Posts: 19,882 ✭✭✭✭✭
I posed the same question on VAMWorld, and I'm curious to see what people here will come up with.
John
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
0
Comments
The color of the toning of the prints is consistent with the color of the toning on the rest of the coin.
I am going to say 30-40 years old, guessing it was handled during the time of the GSA sales.
JK, but honestly i have no clue...
<< <i>I am going to say 30-40 years old, guessing it was handled during the time of the GSA sales. >>
give or take a century!
R.I.P. Bear
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
100% Positive BST transactions
You do know that when you eat at a restaurant, no one preparing you meal should ever touch your food with bare hands, right? It's kinda like that I guess.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
Looks more like a big toe to me!
<< <i>Hmmm. I've seen 1971-S IKEs still in the gvmt. plio. packaging with big fingerprints. >>
Interesting. The question that begs is the same as for the subject coin? Whose fingerprint is it? Someone in the coining room, or someone in packaging? In the case of the Ike, they were at most days away from each other, for the 1881-CC Morgan, the time difference was 91-92 years.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
.....................................................
<< <i>From the size of it I would say it's a Thumb Print. >>
Agree. Looks like someone used their thumb to press that coin into a coin album.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Without a doubt in my mind the finger print is less than 130 years old...............
eddited to add: Incredible photo.
That would be helpful info as well
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
If you read chapter 9 of the VAM book, you'll see how the CC dollars were handled with care and only by gloved hands. I'm going to assume this is true and say that it has to be a fingerprint from an 1881 CC mint employee. I'll even go one step further and start to determine which once. Note that the weaker prints on the obverse and reverse rims are in the same place. Pick up a coin, obverse side up, from a pile by its edge with thumb and forefinger of your left hand. Have your thumb by E PLURIB and your forefinger will be by the mintmark. Take a cursory look at the obverse, then flip it over without putting it down, but so that you can inspect the entire reverse. You can flip it over in your fingertips such that the center of the obverse lands on the fingertip of your index finger. If these two-sided prints indicate the coin was picked up for inspection, then the prints belong to someone tasked with that duty -- a left-handed quality inspector. (CSI junkies will now picture me with a stack of Morgan dollars and an ink pad in a room lit only by mood lighting of various colors, background music, and computers that chirp as they process images trying to reproduce this pattern.)
It is now interesting to ponder how many other 128 year old fingerprints exist that can be attributed to only a handful of people? A quick glance at the history of fingerprinting (according to Wikipedia) shows that the first use of fingerprints in a criminal case was in 1892, so the practice of fingerprinting government employees of sensitive operations, such as minting coins, for identification purposes wouldn't have existed then. Fast forward to 1972. Would all the potential GSA coin handlers have been printed? If so, we could possibly rule them all out (chirping computers again), and demonstrate that, absent an 1878-80 GSA coin with similar print, this is the oldest fingerprint in numismatics, as there would be no older coin known to have gone from initial minting and bagging to sealed container without having been touched in between.
Yeah, that's a lot of "ifs," and it doesn't rule out any unofficial handling in 1972, but it's kind of neat to think about and wonder if there could be such thing as a desirable fingerprint on a coin.
Glad you like the picture. I think I'm going to put this in my 2010 coin calendar with a "Possible 129 year old fingerprint" subtitle. Thanks for playing along.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
After examining both prints there is a 14 point match, convictions are obtained with far fewer points.
<< <i><<<I think it was the same mint employee that did them both. here's mine from CC>>>
After examining both prints there is a 14 point match, convictions are obtained with far fewer points. >>
LMAO: You're not serious? lol
that's great!
bob
My YouTube Channel
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
"Live long and prosper"
My "How I Started" columns