Always took candy from strangers Didn't wanna get me no trade Never want to be like papa Working for the boss every night and day --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
I'm curious about why the OP's coin was not thought to be a 7/8 by DK. Hopefully this is one. Any idea of the VAM? I've had it for exactly 50 years. (I keep VERY complete records!!).
I wish I could comment on more coins posted in these threads. Unfortunately during daylight hours I'm stuck at work and they employ filters that block most photohosting sites (i.e., photobucket). All I see is a little red x. Boucharda used auctiva and I can see those. It's real frustrating and just hope posters don't think I'm in "ignore" mode.
Comments
VAM 37
K S
<< <i>xf detail but not a 7/8
K S >>
Why would you say it's not a 7/8 when it most obviously is?
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
1) Joint
2) Toothpick
3) Themometer
4) "Other"
<< <i>
<< <i>xf detail but not a 7/8
K S >>
Why would you say it's not a 7/8 when it most obviously is? >>
looked like 7/5 or 7/4 from the digi-pic
K S
<< <i>boucharda ... your's is a VAM 33. >>
Correct.....MS 62 VAM 33
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>xf detail but not a 7/8
K S >>
Why would you say it's not a 7/8 when it most obviously is? >>
looked like 7/5 or 7/4 from the digi-pic
K S >>
Ah, I see.
The variety as a whole is called 7/8 TF.
Thanks Karl!
VAM 37 is classified as "strong" ... Vam 33 is "weak" of course, that is, if you send to PCGS. NGC doesn't seem to care.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>xf detail but not a 7/8
K S >>
Why would you say it's not a 7/8 when it most obviously is? >>
looked like 7/5 or 7/4 from the digi-pic
K S >>
The variety as a whole is a 7/8, dork.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1