Little saddened..........please read. EBAY
I recently purchased a 58 Topps Brown rookie and recieved it today. By the looks of it, it has been resealed. I know the seller and he is a board member and won't mention names but what should I do. I wrote to him and am waiting on a response. I just can't understand why it wasn't listed describing that much. What should I do guys..................
rob
rob
1964 Topps Football
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
edited for spelling...if you must know, it was "so." Not really.
If you can, give the seller/board member at least a couple of days to reply & explain... I'm sure he will issue a refund.
Good luck!
Mike
Always looking for Chipper Jones cards.
Im a very focused collector of cards from 1909 - 2012...LOL
As it is the card looks like it matches the grade assigned.
Do you believe the card is an altered card or reprint?
I'm guessing this one will work out well for both you and the seller.
Guess I could use the "glasses bigger", whatever that means.
I am sorry you are upset, lets give this person a chance to make good on this or at least respond to your concerns. I am sure it will be resolved to your satisfaction in the end.
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
I hope everything works out okay for you and that the seller does what's right.
PoppaJ
<< <i>Hopefully elsnorto will step up and address these acqusations..... >>
I wouldn't give it a second thought,Scott will come thru for you.He's a stand-up guy!
J.R.
Needs'
1972 Football-9's high#'s
1965 Football-8's
1958 Topps FB-7-8
Go Phillies
I never realized El Snorto was Snorts.
Regardless if the card is low end the slab has been compromised and he should have know better.
I'll wait for his reply though before I make my final determination.
Sorry you are stressing over this.
Steve
Is it possible that the holder was damaged during shipping? Postal processing can create damage that will make the holder appear compromised. Oft times, as soon as someone sees some frosting, they jump to conclusions. I realize that there is more than just frosting on the received item, but let's pause and realize that it appears to be the same exact card from the holder that looked intact in the auction.
I've done several deals with Scott and seriously doubt that he would risk his reputation over a $100 sale. I'm guessing that the item may have been damaged during transit. I don't see a reason that a PSA 4 (MC) would be swapped out. The card definitely appears to be the same card.
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
Another concern is that the card should be graded OC not MC IMHO.
In any event, I think we all should err on the side of caution and allow Snorts to reply.
Also, and this is important (again IMO) the OP was adamant about NOT outing the seller at this time.
So what happens? Someone else does it for him. That IMO is lame. If this turns out to be an honest mistake
I'd be pissed.
Steve
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
I agree,I've done plenty of deals with scott,never had a problem.
J.R.
Needs'
1972 Football-9's high#'s
1965 Football-8's
1958 Topps FB-7-8
I mailed your '81 football today (58 cards). You should receive them in a few days. LMK when you get them.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Blackie is stressing and that is the reason this thread was created, he did say he did not want to out the person yet.
That IMO should have been honored. I'm guessing he wanted to get opinions on if the slab was in fact what he thought it was.
I dunno.
IMO the cold weather wreaked havoc on that slab.
It is the same card as the scan that is for sure, what I can't see is how it got the MC qualifier and not the OC.
Then again we just saw a 54 Mays with the same problem.
Steve
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
No you can't.
Steve
I dunno this is one of those things that will have us slapping the back of our knees
when we are told what really happened here.
(Not saying blackie is not being forthcoming)
Steve
I'm sure Scott will contact you and work things out. Give him a chance before others here make a mountain out of a mole hill...
<< <i>Scott may be on to something, when it is cold plastic can do weired things.
Another concern is that the card should be graded OC not MC IMHO.
In any event, I think we all should err on the side of caution and allow Snorts to reply.
Also, and this is important (again IMO) the OP was adamant about NOT outing the seller at this time.
So what happens? Someone else does it for him. That IMO is lame. If this turns out to be an honest mistake
I'd be pissed.
Steve >>
maybe I misunderstood this reply then...
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
<< <i>That card doesn't look bad at all to me. I would suspect tampering if the card was in a six or seven holder.
As it is the card looks like it matches the grade assigned.
Do you believe the card is an altered card or reprint?
I'm guessing this one will work out well for both you and the seller. >>
The holder in Rob's scan is SO obviously compromised! The whole bottom of the holder is frosted and cracked out! I guarantee it! And it wasn't done by accident! It was very deliberate. The question again is WHY. What do you really gain from switching out a PSA 4 M/C in comparison to possibly ruining your reputation and losing your credibility in the Hobby? And to be thought of a SCAMMER? I hope there is a good explanation, especially for Rob's peace of mine and all who collect & sell here. Sorry for your troubles, Rob! I hope you get things worked out!
EARL
<< <i>Just waiting on him to respond and he will. Guess I could resend it in to be reholdered but if it came back as altered then ouch. Oh well Im a little calmer now as my as I started a board game with the kids. Thank you for your responses and i know myself and the seller can work it out. Maybe its a clue i should spend more time with the kids and less time on ball cards............ >>
stop saying stuff like that...my wife snoops around here sometimes...
Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
- uncut
Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...