Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

reverse proof gold

jsfjsf Posts: 1,889
in U.S. Coin Forum
Considering all the hoopla over the UHR, I began to wonder which of these two coins is really the most desirable.

Or, are both of these modern gold issues really good to get into your collection? Why?

Even if you had to "settle" for 69s?

Comments

  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I regret that I sold my reverse proof AGEs and will one day buy one back.

    Even if you had to "settle" for 69s?

    I think this is a silly statement (hopefully, tongue in cheek). Unless the coin has an obvious defect, I cannot tell the difference and do not care what assigned the grade is. I would never have my own RP slabbed.
    My Box of 20: https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/box-20/ryks-gold-box-20/17132
  • Options
    7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,991 ✭✭✭✭✭
    69s are usually good with the right company....
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Options
    jsfjsf Posts: 1,889
    oh yes, most certainly I was joshing about the 69s. Hence my quote around "settle." I'd be quite happy with a PCGS 69 reverse proof AGE, I do believe!


    *given this supposed, declining market, at what point does one decide to re-acquire a RP AGE and pull the trigger?
  • Options
    coinspeakcoinspeak Posts: 283
    I have a 2006 first strike PCGS PF70 whatver.

    It is tucked away in a bank vault for my future grandson.



    He will let us know if it was worth keeping.
    Ships are safe in harbor but thats not what ships were built for.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...