Question about hairlines being called 'Cleaning'

My question is this:
If a coin has faint hairlines that are present on only one quarter the area of only one side of the coin; the other side having no hairlines at all...
Would you grade the coin as 'cleaned'.
and if you do, then please explain to me how one can go about physically cleaning a coin by only cleaning one quadrant of only one side?
If a coin has faint hairlines that are present on only one quarter the area of only one side of the coin; the other side having no hairlines at all...
Would you grade the coin as 'cleaned'.
and if you do, then please explain to me how one can go about physically cleaning a coin by only cleaning one quadrant of only one side?
"Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
0
Comments
Fantstic coins otherwise.
100% Positive BST transactions
and this is why I've asked the question.
Personally, I think the grading companies (in this scenario) are completely wrong and doing an injustice to the hobby as a whole and specifically to the 'small guy' who submits coins and gets discouraged with all the BB's.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>A previous owner cleaned off a dirt spot or some sort of spec in just one quadrant of a coin. Perhaps it was cleaned with a solution or just wiped with a cloth; either way, it left marks on just one area of the coin. I've seen quite a few coins with this characteristic. >>
I thought of that too.
But does that justify a bodybag?
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>But does that justify a bodybag? >>
I suppose that depends on the size and degree of the cleaned/wiped area as well as the grader looking at the coin. It's surface damage just like a scratch or rim rump...
<< <i>
<< <i>A previous owner cleaned off a dirt spot or some sort of spec in just one quadrant of a coin. Perhaps it was cleaned with a solution or just wiped with a cloth; either way, it left marks on just one area of the coin. I've seen quite a few coins with this characteristic. >>
I thought of that too.
But does that justify a bodybag? >>
Yes.
Its never been a question of "fully" cleaned vs "partially" cleaned or even "A little bit" cleaned.
If its been cleaned, then its been cleaned.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>
<< <i>A previous owner cleaned off a dirt spot or some sort of spec in just one quadrant of a coin. Perhaps it was cleaned with a solution or just wiped with a cloth; either way, it left marks on just one area of the coin. I've seen quite a few coins with this characteristic. >>
I thought of that too.
But does that justify a bodybag? >>
Yes, like "a little" pregnant.
<< <i>A previous owner cleaned off a dirt spot or some sort of spec in just one quadrant of a coin. Perhaps it was cleaned with a solution or just wiped with a cloth; either way, it left marks on just one area of the coin. I've seen quite a few coins with this characteristic. >>
If a coin NEEDS to be cleaned, do the whole thing where at least the entire coin has a uniform appearance.
those who like to talk about brillo pads are either joking, exaggerating, or don't understand that one needs only a soft cloth to put the hairlines on a coin. that is why grandmothers are so often inclined to clean coins. they think their soft cloths they polish silver with will do no harm. --Jerry
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>A previous owner cleaned off a dirt spot or some sort of spec in just one quadrant of a coin. Perhaps it was cleaned with a solution or just wiped with a cloth; either way, it left marks on just one area of the coin. I've seen quite a few coins with this characteristic. >>
I thought of that too.
But does that justify a bodybag? >>
Yes.
Its never been a question of "fully" cleaned vs "partially" cleaned or even "A little bit" cleaned.
If its been cleaned, then its been cleaned. >>
I agree, thus it rates a bodybag. However, the two top services don't see it this way with pre-1850 coinage. I'm still surprised by the amount of bust era material that have obviously been scrubbed, showing far too many hairlines, that both services will silently net grade. The fact is that they "need" these coins in their population reports to show their credibility, but it is a bad thing for the collector looking for an original piece buying sight unseen (which is one of the motives for the TPGs in the first place).
K S
In most cases I've seen a "few" lowers the grade but if there's a pattern even in one area it bags it.
<< <i>the word "cleaned" is being used to the point of inducing wild paranoia, which i think the tpg's love. a coin can very easily have hairlines, even parallel hairlines, yet never have been cleaned
K S >>
This is my main point.
If only the hairlines are located at one isolated area, I feel the term 'cleaned' is inappropriate.
Cleaning may not have created this 'isolated' area.
Perhaps a term of 'uneven wear' could be more useful.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
just completed 3d tour to Iraq and retired after 28+ years in the US Army
try to get that spot off. bingo... a cleaned coin with only one quadrant with hairlines.
simple as that.
<< <i>the word "cleaned" is being used to the point of inducing wild paranoia, which i think the tpg's love. a coin can very easily have hairlines, even parallel hairlines, yet never have been cleaned
K S >>
this is too vague a statement. a circ coin that was slid over a counter to buy a whiskey in 1888
is one thing.. but to see parallel hairlines on high and low surfaces shows that someone
really did mess with it... thus cleaned.
i have looked at enough circulated coins to know that normal usage usually does not impart
what we are calling hairlines.
it always seems to be collector coins that were treated like this. not 1964-1984 lincoln cents.
odd that? not at all. collectors mess with coins. it is well known. a tendency they always draw
to like a moth to a flame. to improve the coin is what is going on in their head.
............it pays to examine a coin fully BEFORE submitting. might prevent the sting of rejection.
Lane
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
morris
** I would take a shack on the Rock over a castle in the sand !! **
Don't take life so seriously...nobody gets out alive.
ALL VALLEY COIN AND JEWELRY
28480 B OLD TOWN FRONT ST
TEMECULA, CA 92590
(951) 757-0334
www.allvalleycoinandjewelry.com
<< <i>An eraser, cloth, cotton swab, finger, potato chip, folded slice of bologna, etc. Anything used in an attempt to remove (clean) a spot or bit of dirt will scratch the coin. >>
Is bologna good for cleaning coins?
<< <i>If a coin has faint hairlines that are present on only one quarter the area of only one side of the coin; the other side having no hairlines at all...
Would you grade the coin as 'cleaned'. >>
Yes and it really makes you feel like a idiot when you get home from a shop or show and find this. The obscure little patch of fine closely bunch lines that you missed.....
Ken
<< <i>"hairlined" does not always equal "cleaned" >>
correct. we're talking natural wear vs an overt cleaning attempt.
hard and fast rule?
nope, gotta go case by case and trust your experience and instinct.
Lafayette Grading Set
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire