Is this 1921-D a VAM-1B-2?

moosesr · June 27, 2008 3:56AM

Does this coin have a weak enough "e" in we to be considered a VAM-1B-2 instead of just VAM-1B, or does the "e" have to be completely missing?
Thanks,
Charlie

DennisH · June 27, 2008 4:54AM

Charlie:

I see what you mean about it being a "tweener", but my first reaction was that it is weak enough to be a 1B2. Neat coin, and thanks for sharing!

moosesr · June 27, 2008 10:02PM

Any VAM people here this morning?

messydesk · June 28, 2008 1:32AM

Doesn't quite look as weak as the one in Rob's 1921-D book, but since die fills fade in and out, it's a tough call. Bottom line is if it would be accepted by VAM collectors as that die fill, and I would vote "aye."

COINB0Y · June 28, 2008 1:36AM

What ever it is, it sure looks nice!

moosesr · June 28, 2008 1:51AM

These are the sellers pictures, and in hand the coin is only XF/AU.

moosesr · September 26, 2008 2:57AM

Here is my picture of this coin.

messydesk · September 26, 2008 3:10AM

It looks like the same die fill as the VAM 1B2, but the fill, she's a clearin' up. I think it would probably be valued more than a "normal" VAM 1B, but less than the VAM 1B2 with completely missing letter. Earlier today, this variety was one that I cited that is collectible by die progression, since many die states and two different die fills are known.

… · September 26, 2008 3:37AM

no, doesnt count. it has to be completely vanished. very cool though.

Is this 1921-D a VAM-1B-2?

Comments

Leave a Comment