Home U.S. Coin Forum

When did error collecting take off?

OKbustchaserOKbustchaser Posts: 5,549 ✭✭✭✭✭
As a young collector in the 1960's I don't remember dealers even being able to give away error coins. Just no market for them. There was even a disparaging name for errors: FIDO. Collectors wanted their coins to look the way they were supposed to.

When did this seem to turn around?
Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.

Comments

  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    I remember back in 1977 at the tender of age of 11 getting into a bidding war with a dealer over a off-center 1968 Lincoln cent. I won the coin for $4.00 and still have it. Probably over paid. It surprises me that "freaks" as they were known were ever unpopular. Some of these look amazing.



    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • garsmithgarsmith Posts: 5,894 ✭✭
    << When did error collecting take off? >>

    As soon as the first error coin was discovered
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Error coins are cool.

    image

    peacockcoins

  • MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭
    " When did error collecting take off ? "

    With the 1955 Double Die cent...IMHO
    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,815 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would say that Coin World's Collectors Clearinghouse page did a lot to popularize error coins. Back in the 60's I found a (what turned out to be very minor) error in my pocket change that I wanted to know more about. An older collector showed me a Coin World and said write to these people. I did, and eventually ended up working there.
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,735 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I remember back in 1977 at the tender of age of 11 getting into a bidding war with a dealer over a off-center 1968 Lincoln cent. I won the coin for $4.00 and still have it. Probably over paid. It surprises me that "freaks" as they were known were ever unpopular. Some of these look amazing. >>



    The 1968 Philly is actually one of the tougher Memorial cents to find off-center, not quite as tough as the 1968-S but close. The San Francisco coins have the reputation of being the rarest but there are a few Philly coins which rival them, particularly the 1969, 1961, and 1962 (in that order).

    To the OP's question, someone like Fred Weinberg could probably give you an excellent answer. My understanding is that during the very early days of collecting error coins were shunned and even discarded (melted or otherwise) as collectors strove for only the finest condition examples. As inaccurate as it was, Frank Spadone's popular book on FIDOs at least got people looking at their coins and thinking of errors as something collectible. I don't think error collecting gained widespread acceptance until the early 1970s, around the time CONE and NECA were founded (and would eventually merge to form CONECA).


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I really have no definitive answer, However, I do remember interest spiking with the '55 DDO cent. Cheers, RickO
  • Blame Fred
  • erroiderroid Posts: 795
    My guess is the mid 80's, about the time that I got back into collecting. Arnie Margolis had his self-published rag out of Long Island NY and his "stuff" looked real interesting. Actually, it was the $$ that really got my interest.... Just imagine, $5-$10 for that "oddity" found in pocket change....
    John G Bradley II
  • LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,725 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>" When did error collecting take off ? " July 17, 1969.....image ...edit: Sorry - its an inside joke >>

    FMH, is that your birthday?image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭



    << <i><< I remember back in 1977 at the tender of age of 11 getting into a bidding war with a dealer over a off-center 1968 Lincoln cent. I won the coin for $4.00 and still have it. Probably over paid. It surprises me that "freaks" as they were known were ever unpopular. Some of these look amazing. >>


    The 1968 Philly is actually one of the tougher Memorial cents to find off-center, not quite as tough as the 1968-S but close. The San Francisco coins have the reputation of being the rarest but there are a few Philly coins which rival them, particularly the 1969, 1961, and 1962 (in that order). >>

    Thanks Sean. Perhaps I didn't overpay afterall.



    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • WalmannWalmann Posts: 2,806
    I recall back in the late 60's and early 70's the only error coins of great interest were the Lincoln cents such as the 22 no D and the 55 double strike. The Franklin "bugs bunny" also had a small premium. Off center strikes and other error coins had little interest.

    There were always some collectors interested in errors, where others shunned them as imperfection. I think sometime in the mid to late 80's there were a greater number of collectors interested in errors, perhaps some of it was speculation at the time, for others it was a sincere interest.
  • I think this depends on definition. Has error collecting entered the majority popularity level yet? I think the growth and interest for general error collecting has a continuing increased potential that will be very rewarding for those individuals that have been building collections for some time. Error collecting is a very affordable, satisfying and academically interesting specialty of numismatics. I am not commenting solely on the basis of economic gain( although this will increase also). Respectfully, John Curlis
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow - here's a topic I could talk about for hours....and did,
    back at the ANA Speakers Forum at the San Francisco ANA.
    The topic was "The Early Days of Error Collecting".

    Short version - in general, there were VERY few major errors
    (Major = Mechanical, not Die Varieties) before 1964.

    At that time, the Mint was pumping out coins in much larger
    quantities than ever, and more errors got out in canvas bags
    than ever before - Double Strikes, Off-Centers, Off-Metals, Clips, etc.

    The first local Error club was in Hollywood, Calif. in 1967 (I was member
    # 11, as I recall), and 1967 was also the first year ever for an
    "Error-A-Rama" - the first coin show devoted exclusively to Mint
    Error coins.

    In the Mid-60's, a single D/S or O/M error would be "The Topic" of
    conversation at any coin club meeting, and as mentioned earlier
    in this thread, Collectors Clearinghouse (Jim Johnson) in Coin World
    was about the only lengthy Error 'page' anywhere, not counting the
    Error Clubs like CONE (Collectors of Numismatic Errors) or NECA
    (Numismatic Error Collectors of America). (these clubs eventually merged)

    In the 50's and 60's, there was literally a small hand-full of collectors, and
    even a much smaller group of dealers, who could authenticate, buy-sell,
    and collect Mint Error coins - up untill the mid-70's or so, they were considered
    OddBalls, "Freaks", and "Fidos" (Freaks-Irregularities-Defects-Oddities).

    I'd have lots of dealers and 'normal' coin collectors stop by my showcases
    and comment on my errors, but in general, the coins were way past most
    collectors understanding and pricing levels, even then.

    That's kind of a long "short version" - sorry 'bout that......

    Fred
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • OKbustchaserOKbustchaser Posts: 5,549 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks a lot, guys. Weird how certain thoughts come to mind. I have never really been all that interested in errors (although I do own a couple of bust halves with doubled edge lettering) but started wondering while reading the current thread on the double struck buffalo nickel.
    Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
  • As a kid in the 1950's and 60's, anything that looked "odd" or out of place got spent first. I can remember walking into the corner store thinking "I hope they take this and don't refuse it". And, when I got outside, thinking "thank goodness they took it". Can't remember what it was---but back then we only wanted stuff that looked OK. Gosh knows what I could have had?? But, then those were the times back then. Bob [supertooth]
    Bob
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,750 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There are a lot of answers to this question but as I recall it
    was F G Spadone's book "Major Variety-Oddity Guide of US
    Coins" that got a lot of people started in 1962.

    I've often said that much of this is the result of the mint pol-
    icy to stop making small mintages in 1934. If people couldn't
    find scarce dates in change then they were going to lok for
    scarce gems, varieties and errors.

    The '37 3 leg buffalo was the first but it was in this era that
    the '22 plain Lincoln became popular as well.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • EdscoinEdscoin Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭


    << <i>When did error collecting take off? >>



    When the TPG's started slabing them and and made them legit!image
    ED
    .....................................................
  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As a teenager, I bought the 1963 edition Frank Spadone's book in 1964. I searched every coin that came into the house with a strong magnifier. The best coins I found were some cool-looking doubled mint marks. The book has fallen apart a bit, but I still have it. It's more of a curiosity piece now. The prices for mint state type coins seem incredibly cheap compared to today.

    Jim
    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Spadone Book (Frank Spadone)
    had 'enhanced' photos of minor die
    errors that HE owned by the roll and
    put in his book to give them more value;
    the photos were much better than the
    actual coins.

    Also, a large number of his "major" error
    photos (double strikes, etc.) were of
    MAN-MADE FAKES......

    Yes, the book caught alot of interested collectors,
    (I used it too as it was about the only thing around)
    but we quickly realized it really wasn't worth much
    compared to Del Ford, Don Taxay, and other's who
    had done books on Mint Error coins.
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Also, a large number of his "major" error
    photos (double strikes, etc.) were of
    MAN-MADE FAKES...... >>


    Tisk, tisk.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,750 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The Spadone Book (Frank Spadone)
    had 'enhanced' photos of minor die
    errors that HE owned by the roll and
    put in his book to give them more value;
    the photos were much better than the
    actual coins.

    Also, a large number of his "major" error
    photos (double strikes, etc.) were of
    MAN-MADE FAKES......

    Yes, the book caught alot of interested collectors,
    (I used it too as it was about the only thing around)
    but we quickly realized it really wasn't worth much
    compared to Del Ford, Don Taxay, and other's who
    had done books on Mint Error coins. >>




    He listed an awful lot of junk that could never stand the test of time.

    For some reason he sold a lot of copies though. It was likely just that
    there was a vacuum being filled.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    image

    Variety collecting took off with the 1955 DDO.

    Error collecting took off later?

    Ed
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The first Mint Error Collector's Organization was formed at the 1956 ANA by 30 collectors, later changed to The Numismatic Error Collector's Organization. Micheal Kolman mentioned in his 1960's book on IHC and Lincoln errors, that 20 years earlier (1940's) there was no interest in these examples.
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file