Home U.S. Coin Forum

Jefferson Nickel sells for over $10,000

coolestcoolest Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭
1942 D over D PCGS MS65, sells for $8500 + 20%
even an AU55 example almost hit $1000 (sold for $750 + 20%)

Are Jefferson's getting hot?

Anyone know what the 46-D over D coin might be selling for at various graded?

http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=007&sspagename=STRK:MEWA:IT&viewitem=&item=170227557781&rd=1

Comments

  • I would think it's just a rare version of the coin to begin with and it's even tougher to find in higher grades.

    There are quite a few in high grade but, many are in the hands of collectors... when a high grade appears for sale... those 'in the need of one' jump on it.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Not sure if they are hot but it's supply and demand so one or two blips don't make a demand. If there is consistency over the next year then there is demand.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,742 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like it sold for 8500 +15% (9775).

    A couple 1946 D/D were in the same sale and sold for ~4400.
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • coolestcoolest Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Looks like it sold for 8500 +15% (9775).

    A couple 1946 D/D were in the same sale and sold for ~4400. >>



    My bad! Jefferson nickel sells for almost $10,000
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1942-D/Horizontal D and 1946-D/Inverted D are the two rarest MM errors in the Jefferson series and perhaps the two rarest major die variety coins from the Modern era. they are certainly many multiples rarer than a coin like the 1955 Doubled Die Lincoln Cent but the Cent is immensely more popular, recognized and scores higher on the "Cool" scale. with die variety coins like these Jeffersons, it's all about recognition and collector base. FWIW, the two varieties in question were known to very few people until perhaps the past 5-15 years which has been a very aggressive time for variety collecting. certainly they were known for quite some time but until recently noone cared about them and they were rather cheap.

    also, until recently there was still doubt as to the validity of the 1946-D since some speculated that it was a die chip and not an OMM. once you see a nice clear Mint State coin you understand it's clearly an inverted "D" under the normal MM, but the skepticism has held the coin back. it's generally accepted that the 1942-D is the rarer of the two, but i see it otherwise. they are nice coins if you can find them but the days of buying them on the cheap are gone.
  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,742 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I always thought they referred to the 1942 as being rarer than the 1946 in regards to Mint State examples, which is very clear in the pop reports.
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with Keets. I believe the 1946-D/inverted D is rarer than the 1942-D/horizontal D in Unc. grades, and the 1946-D/inverted D is WAY rarer in circulated grades.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    certainly the PCGS pop report tends to bear out the fact that the 1942-D is rarer(less known) in Mint State grades, especially so in Full Steps, but sales records from Heritage don't seem quite as convincing. NGC shows a pop for each close to equal and i'd be interested in knowing what ANACS/SEGS show, but i don't have access to their graded pop information. it's always struck me as strange that the 1942-D/D circulated so much to give us such a large number of lower graded coins, while at the same time virtually every known 1946-D/D is Mint State. i perceive that to mean there were more 1942-D/D struck than 1946-D/D. further, both issues were well struck and are relatively easy to find in Full Step Mint State grades; thePCGS pop report shows the 1942-D to have approximately 1/3 more coins graded as Full Steps.

    maybe the 1946-D die that struck the OMM's simply had a longer lifespan than it's 1942-D counterpart. whatever the reason for the poips as they are currently listed, my instincts tell me that the 1946-D/Inverted D is the rarer coin in all numbers, Mint State or circulated
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In January 2006 a 1942-D/D in MS64FS PCGS sold for $32,200 in a Heritage auction.
    In September 2006 a 1950-D in MS67FS PCGS sold for $17,250 in a Heritage auction.
    In September 2006 a 1942-D/D in MS65 PCGS sold for $14,950 in a Heritage auction.
    In January 2007 a 1942-D/D in MS65 PCGS sold for $12,650 in a Heritage auction.
    In June 2004 a 1942-D/D in MS63FS PCGS sold for $12,075 in a Heritage auction.
    In February 2006 a 1946-D/D in MS66FS PCGS sold for $11,500 in a Heritage auction.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dennis, please expain??
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Some folks seemed surprised that a Jeff recently came close to selling for $10K, so I looked up the highest Jeff prices I could find in the Heritage archives in order to make the point that $10K is neither new nor overly extraordinary.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • FullStepJeffsFullStepJeffs Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    I agree with Keets...

    And I believe you will see many Jeffs go for more than 10K this year. Especially when JHF's set sells.

    Steve
    U.S. Air Force Security Forces Retired

    In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
  • sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500
    I think some regular business strikes have hit that
  • coolestcoolest Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭


    << <i>In January 2006 a 1942-D/D in MS64FS PCGS sold for $32,200 in a Heritage auction.
    In September 2006 a 1950-D in MS67FS PCGS sold for $17,250 in a Heritage auction.
    In September 2006 a 1942-D/D in MS65 PCGS sold for $14,950 in a Heritage auction.
    In January 2007 a 1942-D/D in MS65 PCGS sold for $12,650 in a Heritage auction.
    In June 2004 a 1942-D/D in MS63FS PCGS sold for $12,075 in a Heritage auction.
    In February 2006 a 1946-D/D in MS66FS PCGS sold for $11,500 in a Heritage auction. >>



    Wow! I think for the 50-D I will settle for an MS66FS example for about $75. I just saved over $17,000 Whoo Hoo!
  • Amazing the prices on the two dates being talked about, but what about the 58-D/horz D? There are only about 6 of those known in MS. I would say this is even a rarer date.
    Dr. Terrance Wilson
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There were 3 1942-D/horizontal D's sold, a MS64 $5462, a MS65 $9775 and a MS63FS $8050. If their were 3 buyers who got the better deal? or Which was the better coin?


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • 1953 D/D Horizontal do you mean?? I have one in MS
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>In January 2006 a 1942-D/D in MS64FS PCGS sold for $32,200 in a Heritage auction.
    In September 2006 a 1950-D in MS67FS PCGS sold for $17,250 in a Heritage auction.
    In September 2006 a 1942-D/D in MS65 PCGS sold for $14,950 in a Heritage auction.
    In January 2007 a 1942-D/D in MS65 PCGS sold for $12,650 in a Heritage auction.
    In June 2004 a 1942-D/D in MS63FS PCGS sold for $12,075 in a Heritage auction.
    In February 2006 a 1946-D/D in MS66FS PCGS sold for $11,500 in a Heritage auction. >>



    Wow! I think for the 50-D I will settle for an MS66FS example for about $75. I just saved over $17,000 Whoo Hoo! >>



    I haven't checked on the others image but the 50-D took a $10,000 hit if it sells at the asking price. If the June 2004 1942-D/D in MS63FS that sold for $12,075, is the same MS63FS coin that just sold, it too took another $4000 hit. And what about the MS65 example? Is it the same coin? Or the 46D/D? Are collectors bidding more conservative these days?


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • I just bought a 1946 D/D inverted in MS-65 PCGS for pennies on the dollar, this coin will only go up!!!
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i would have to agree that the selling price of the '46 has nowhere but up to go, but i'd figure a price in MS65 at closer to $1500-$2000 instead of the crazy levels they're selling for right now. thinking about what Leo had to say, i wonder if any of these are the same coins?? with such low pop numbers it's likely someone lost money. also, i get nervous, skeptical and suspicious whenever low-pop coins sell for ever increasing prices in a short time frame.
  • There were 3 1942-D/horizontal D's sold, a MS64 $5462, a MS65 $9775 and a MS63FS $8050. If their were 3 buyers who got the better deal? or Which was the better coin?

    Leo

    Personally I liked the MS63FS which was the coin I owned previously - nice strike and clean steps.


    So who outbid me on this coin last night?

    1943/2-P 5C MS67 Full Steps PCGS....
    Lot 538 PCGS MS67 -- Sold For: * $16,675.00

    Frank
    (The Corso Collection) Always looking for high quality proof and full step Jeffersons - email me with details

    My Jefferson Full Step Variety Set (1938 - Current)

    My Jefferson Proof Variety Set (1938 - Current)
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I just bought a 1946 D/D inverted in MS-65 PCGS for pennies on the dollar, this coin will only go up!!! >>




    Very good!


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>There were 3 1942-D/horizontal D's sold, a MS64 $5462, a MS65 $9775 and a MS63FS $8050. If their were 3 buyers who got the better deal? or Which was the better coin?

    Leo

    Personally I liked the MS63FS which was the coin I owned previously - nice strike and clean steps.


    So who outbid me on this coin last night?

    1943/2-P 5C MS67 Full Steps PCGS....
    Lot 538 PCGS MS67 -- Sold For: * $16,675.00

    Frank >>



    The FS coin also helps you get closer to 100%. The MS64 coin was a little more cleaner with presentable steps. The strike showed more detail then the MS65 coin which only had luster and unmarked surfaces going for it making it only a Q2 quality coin. In my book, a coin with less than a full strike can't grade higher then MS64 unless there is something extra nice about it, like toning or prooflike fields.

    Don't know who did the outbidding but whomever it was, he didn't particularly like the 50-D.

    IMO, me thinks PCGS might see a few of those coins.

    Did you buy to a coin for a review? That's the new rule, you know! Everybody got to do it at least once in their lifetime. image


    Leo

    P.S. You do know who has the best overall struck Jefferson nickel collection. image

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • stephunterstephunter Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭

    I like the 46 d/d also:

    image
    image
  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    I have never found a 1942 d/d unc, but have found 3 or 4 1946 d/d's. In circ condition, their respective scarcity seems to be reversed reversed. Or

    perhaps I just don't bother to look closely at circulated 46-D's?
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In 15+ years of looking, I've found 3 circulated 1942-D/D's, and not a single 1946-D/D...
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • larrynjlarrynj Posts: 535
    these are not omm - overmintmarks, but rpm's repunched mintmarks. a bit more dramatic than your usual rpm, but still just an rpm.

    i may be i little bitter about these since i chose not to include rpm's in my collection started 30 years ago. i went with the 49d/s,54, 55 omm's. guess i missed the boat. image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file