Home U.S. Coin Forum

is rare the most over used term in numismatics?

fcfc Posts: 12,796 ✭✭✭
is rare the most over used term in numismatics?

how can something so rare be seen on the auction block every 3 months?

are collectors/dealers misusing the word constantly?
are collectors fooling themselves into thinking that coins they own
are rare?

i am becoming jaded now days how collectors think the coins we collect
are rare when they are anything but.

maybe 1% of the US coin population could be considered rare, maybe
3% should be considered scarce, with the remainder common as dirt?
maybe even less then that?
ask me that sounds about right. thoughts?

Comments

  • savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,320 ✭✭✭✭
    "PQ for the grade" might be a close second

    greg

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    I believe "rare" is relative and any definition is arbitrary, and I tend to gloss right over the usage of the term, because in the end EVERY coin is unique.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    Ooops, forgot to answer the question. image

    Yes, I think rare is the most overused term in numismatics.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 18,073 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fc,

    You sound down tonight.

    "Rare" works with Ruth's Chris Steakhouse just fine.

    I'm sorry, but a genuine U.S. Coin over 100 years old deserves to be called "rare."

    Hey, perhaps we could re-name these rare coins "senior" coins to be politically expedient!!! image



  • EdscoinEdscoin Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭
    A lot of people seem to think if it was minted before 1964 and is made of silver then its rare
    ED
    .....................................................
  • I like mine medium rare...
    Successful BST purchases from: WaterSport, commoncents123, Hyperion, mozeppa, Mar327, coinlieutenant, Placid, MFH, fishteeth, FilthyBroke, SilverEagles92, illini420, barberman55, pcgs69 (2x) & 123cents

    History of the US Constitution Coin Set


  • << <i>is rare the most over used term in numismatics?

    how can something so rare be seen on the auction block every 3 months?

    are collectors/dealers misusing the word constantly?
    are collectors fooling themselves into thinking that coins they own
    are rare?

    i am becoming jaded now days how collectors think the coins we collect
    are rare when they are anything but.

    maybe 1% of the US coin population could be considered rare, maybe
    3% should be considered scarce, with the remainder common as dirt?

    ask me that sounds about right. thoughts? >>


    Rare is a subjective term and as such has different meanings to different people which is further complicated by different rarity types and scales (e.g. conditional, existential, scarcity, etc.). IMO, 'perfect' is a oft-overused term that leaves less to interpretation and as such is the most over-used numismatic term.
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Possibly - but then again, we do have the "R" scale to bring out more truth to true overall rarity.

    Just because a coin auctions regularly doesn't detract from its' rarity - but frequent turnover may be indicative of other factors, profit being the cheif one in my mind.
  • This content has been removed.


  • << <i>is rare the most over used term in numismatics?

    how can something so rare be seen on the auction block every 3 months?
    >>



    If it is only up for auctions once every 3 months, including all auctions in the world, I would definately consider it rare.

    In comparision, more common coins (still collectable) are up for auctions multiple times per day on ebay.

    So if you imagine a rarity scale like this:

    1. coins you receive in your pocket change everyday.
    2. coins you receive in your pocket change once every 3 months.
    3. coins you probably don't receive in your pocket change at all, but you can buy at auctions (ebay) everyday.
    4. coins you can buy at auctions every 3 months
    5. coins you can buy at auctions every 10 years

    ...I would say that category 4 is rare. What else would you call it? It's just a word. Some people would even say extremely rare.

    category 5 is of course much rarer. Rare enough to be an ultra rarity.


    A bigger problem is all the category 3 coins that are referred to as "extremely rare" on ebay. It's of course true for novices looking through their pocket change, but for collectors it's not true at all.




  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>is rare the most over used term in numismatics? >>



    Don't you need to define the word before attempting to argue that it is being misused?
  • fcfc Posts: 12,796 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>is rare the most over used term in numismatics? >>



    Don't you need to define the word before attempting to argue that it is being misused? >>



    how about the defintion of not being encountered very often.
    something that appears once every 3 months therefore, could never
    be rare.

    once every 5 years might fall into the rare category.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,023 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes.
    "LQQK!" comes in second.
    TD
    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
    I'd prefer if coins were described based on the number of surviving specimens known (to the extent that data is available) using a rarity scale something like that which has been traditionally used - such as this, for example:

    R-1 Common (Population estimated at 1000+)
    R-2 Not So Common (501-1000)
    R-3 Scarce (201-500)
    R-4 Very Scarce (population est. at 76-200)
    R-5 Rare (31-75)
    R-6 Very Rare (13-30)
    R-7 Extremely rare (4-12)
    R-8 Unique or Nearly So (1, 2 or 3)

    For most coins which are legitimately rare (i.e. R-5 or higher), reasonably good population data does exist and it is possible to be pretty precise.

    In any case, I think looking to population data is more logical than focusing on how often one shows up in a public auction.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Yes it is over used.

    Sometimes the same rare coin comes up for auction over and over again but it is still rare.

    I would also add to the definition of rarity that it depends on how many people want a given coin. 1909SVDB Cent is common as dirt but compared to the number of collectors it is rare enough to demand a premium.

    Classic Head Half Eagle is common as well expensive dirt yet crusty original examples are pretty darn rare. Meaning I can go months without seeing one.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    << is rare the most over used term in numismatics? >>

    I think NT is the most overused - and misapplied. Cheers, RickO
  • chiefbobchiefbob Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭
    It is what it is...
    Retired Air Force 1965-2000
    Vietnam Vet 1968-1969


  • << <i>fc,

    You sound down tonight.

    "Rare" works with Ruth's Chris Steakhouse just fine.

    I'm sorry, but a genuine U.S. Coin over 100 years old deserves to be called "rare."

    Hey, perhaps we could re-name these rare coins "senior" coins to be politically expedient!!! image >>



    I like this perspective...just because everyone on this forum has 100's of 100 year old coins doesn't mean the rest of the world shouldn't consider them rare...remember you all have a crazy perspective because, to you, something has to be insanely scarce to be considered truly rare...just my two cents.
    -Rome is Burning

    image
  • something that only comes up for sale every now and again is rare enough for me. Contrast the difficulty of finding, say, an 1897-s barber quarter in PCGS XF-40 with say, a 1909-s Indian Cent in XF-40.

    One is rare enough for me, the other is not. image
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Observation :

    Rare may be used out of context more often than not, but the term "junk" is probably the most detrimental term used in numismatics. It keeps the prices down on widgets and keeps a large majority of "logical" people from ever entering the hobby.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Example:

    It might be a "rare" find to get a roll of AU/BU widgets, but when people refer to it as "junk" silver... it's impossible to get one's mind to process the fact that it's not. But then, there are those in "higher" income brackets that can only look down their noses at such DOGS.
    image

    That's just a counterpoint. No need for debate. It's just my personal observation over the years.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,796 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The most overused terms in numismatics are Proof 70 and Mint State 70.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    While "rare" may be overused, I think that taken in context and without making an attempt to deceive, I have no problem with it.

    To start, the coin hobby/market, as a whole, is often referred to as "rare coins" to make the distinction between these and coins that have no collector value. US Gold, that is collected by date/MM, is often referred to as "rare date gold". It is convention to use these terms, and other similar ones, in numismatic circles, and I have no problem with that. It sounds like the OP has a pet peeve, which I completely understand, as I have several of my own that pertain to coins.

    I do have issues with those who misrepresent coins as being more scarce than they really are. To some extent, pop reports and EAC censuses and the like have made it considerably more difficult to deceive a buyer in this regard.

    I do personally take issue with those who who claim that coins that are not so rare like an 1844-D $5 (known population of around 250 coins) to be "rare" or R7 in uncirculated with probably about a dozen extant coins in that condition. Similarly, when there is a not so rare coin that is rare in a variety that nobody cares about or often even knows about, but the seller is using this fact to overzealously market such a coin, I take issue with this, as well. This is probably a pet peeve of mine because both such situations are fairly commonplace.
  • With the advent of eBay nothing seems so rare!
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,689 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>With the advent of eBay nothing seems so rare! >>


    Conversely; with the advent of eBay, everything seems so "RARE" image LQQK
    image


  • << <i>... But if I hear the term "fresh" just one more time aside from in a deli of course I am going to puke. >>



    Comments overheard on bourse floors...


    "Hey...did you see that guy get FRESH with Laura?...boy did he get a piece of her mind!"

    "That dealer over there actually paid me fair market value for my coins. Now ain't that a breath of FRESH air!"

    "Whew...it's been a long day on the bourse. I think I'll FRESHen up before we go out to dinner."

    "Wow...a collector who isn't insisting on Grey Sheet prices...now that IS reFRESHing!"



    Now...don't get your panties all bunched up...I just couldn't resist getting a little FRESH and poking some funimage


    BTW...in response to the OP... rare is a relative term as many have already said...and more often then not...it is simply hype...

    The term that bugs me the most...and is used way too often...is "PQ"... and the most recent term that bugs me is "CAC- Setting the Standard for Quality"...

    image
    Re: Slabbed coins - There are some coins that LIVE within clear plastic and wear their labels with pride... while there are others that HIDE behind scratched plastic and are simply dragged along by a label. Then there are those coins that simply hang out, naked and free image
  • notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭
    Rare is certainly overused and misused. I agree totally. But at least it's misused in different ways.

    Here are some repetitive overuses that sound the same every time:

    "Wow, did you see how much that [modern coin] sold for?"

    "There is no such thing as an MS/PR 70"

    "People who pay that much for [modern coin] are morons."

    "I can think of a dozen coins I'd rather have than that [expensive moderrn coin]."

    The last one is surely a true statement but irrelevant.

    --Jerry
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    No but it is the most misunderstood term in numismatics.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'd prefer if coins were described based on the number of surviving specimens known (to the extent that data is available) using a rarity scale something like that which has been traditionally used - such as this, for example:

    R-1 Common (Population estimated at 1000+)
    R-2 Not So Common (501-1000)
    R-3 Scarce (201-500)
    R-4 Very Scarce (population est. at 76-200)
    R-5 Rare (31-75)
    R-6 Very Rare (13-30)
    R-7 Extremely rare (4-12)
    R-8 Unique or Nearly So (1, 2 or 3)

    For most coins which are legitimately rare (i.e. R-5 or higher), reasonably good population data does exist and it is possible to be pretty precise.

    In any case, I think looking to population data is more logical than focusing on how often one shows up in a public auction. >>

    Is there a cap on R-1? Or can everything with a pop greater than 1000 be R-1?
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,585 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought the most overused term was "estate". image

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file