New Morgan - thoughts?

Comments

• ElKevvo Posts: 4,139 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 22, 2008 10:53PM

  Nice! I like the 79-S (It's my grading set year/MM). I would go 64 on this one...I like the rim toning! Nice reflectivity but I have never figured out the PL/DMPL on these unless it is really a mirror.
  
  Thanks for sharing!
  
  K
  
  Edited to change my grading thought from 63 to 64 after I had a cup of coffee...

  ANA LM

  0
• direwolf1972 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭

  February 22, 2008 11:50PM

  Good looking 79. I think it would go 64 and I love that color.

  I'll see your bunny with a pancake on his head and raise you a Siamese cat with a miniature pumpkin on his head.
  
  You wouldn't believe how long it took to get him to sit still for this.
  
  
  

  0
• bsshog40 Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 12:01AM

  I think it's a very nice looking DMPL but with the nics on the Obv, I would have to say MS62.

  -----------------------------------------
  My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
  https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
  
  https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
  

  0
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 12:45AM

  Appears to have nice mirrors.. but pretty 'baggy'..... MS62... Cheers, RickO

  0
• HighRelief Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 1:06AM

  Nice toning with prooflike fields, could grade 63.

  0
• Mercury10c Posts: 2,958

  February 23, 2008 5:25AM

  63, may be PL, love the toning, keep your damn fingers off of it!!

  0
• tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 5:29AM

  
  
  
  
  63 coin

  "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington

  0
• BlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 5:36AM

  62PL. Nice mirrors and a pretty coin. Hope there aren't any new fingerprints

  Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1

  0
• Bear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 5:39AM

  How come no one has mentioned the numerous
  
  carbon spots on the obverse. Other then those, nice
  
  coin and nice picture.

  There once was a place called
  Camelot

  0
• BlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 5:45AM

  
  
  << <i>How come no one has mentioned the numerous
  
  carbon spots on the obverse. Other then those, nice
  
  coin and nice picture. >>
  
  
  
  It's a nicer, gentler board today. Nobody wanted to point out the obvious - plus, personally, I figured them in my "grade"

  Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1

  0
• morgannut2 Posts: 4,293 ✭

  February 23, 2008 6:02AM

  The "carbon spots" are allowed in MS63--much like copper spots on 63's that are
  
  NOT too distracting. Frankly the obverse "looks" 62----but ya can't know
  
  because of the delicate prooflike surfaces-and PCGS allows minor ticks in DMPL AND PL mirrors
  
  up to MS64.
  
  Overall the prooflike surfaces blasting refections thru the colors of bag tone (?) rates this one high in the
  
  superior eye appeal category--certainly a shot (X) at NGC.
  
  NICE--

  morgannut2

  0
• cheezhed Posts: 6,011 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 23, 2008 6:49AM

  Public Service Announcement:
  
  No new fingerprints were added during the imaging of this coin.
  
  You can now return to your regularly scheduled activities.

  Many happy BST transactions

  0