Home U.S. Coin Forum

Opinions on the draped bust half dollar

JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭
What say you?

imageimage

Comments

  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    I've seen these graded anywhere between VF-25 and VF-35.

    My guess is somewhere around VF-30
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've seen these graded anywhere between VF-25 and VF-35.

    My guess is somewhere around VF-30 >>



    What do you think about the "look" of the coin?
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with the VF grade, but I do not care for the color. It's too white in the center.
  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    For the grade and details of the coin, the surfaces are too unnatural.

    Likely dipped and placed in an album and got some light toning on the edge.
  • I think it's more a like a VF20 at most and very white looking - especially for the grade level.
  • jdillanejdillane Posts: 2,365 ✭✭✭
    Is the color in the image an accurate representation? How much, if any, mint luster remains?

    While it does not look like original skin, key for me would be whether there is luster, that she is not too bright or reflective and the absence of hairlines. I'd also probably return her to an album for storage.
  • GeminiGemini Posts: 3,085
    "There is no such thing as a good war or a bad bust piece"...(A lesser known quote by Benjamin Franklin)
    A thing of beauty is a joy for ever
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,090 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Scrub-a-dub-dub...excuse me while I vomit...
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Looks to me like a cleaning (or stripping) and album retone.

    I prefer to have skin all over the place with my album toning.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I agree with the VF grade, but I do not care for the color. It's too white in the center. >>



    Ditto, this coin has been played with a little too much. It's not bad but it does not scream take me home either.
  • greghansengreghansen Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭
    imageYucky. Doesn't do much for me. Without speculating on how it got the look it currently has, IMO the look is not natural, nor is it pleasing to the eye. I would definatley pass on that coin, even at a bargain price.

    Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum

  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭
    This is not meant to be disrespectful to PCGS, just an honest question. If this thing is so bady cleaned, then how does it end up in a PCGS holder? Does PCGS make exceptions for this series? If so, why? I agree that it is harshly cleaned...obviously so. Why didn't it get BB'd?
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,707 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cleaned long ago. Album toning at the edges. Poor eye-appeal.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Doesn't bother me as much as it seems to bother others; VF20 or 25 details, yes lightened and with some retoning (could use another decade in an envelope)

    I'd buy this one as a Fine all day long and twice on Sunday. Would pass at VF money, as others have said, there are better VFs out there.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭
    PCGS VF25. I saw this at Harry Laibstain's Site selling for $775. I'm not buying it, but someone might want to pick it up. That seems like a fair price to me if you don't mind the cleaning.


  • << <i>PCGS VF25. I saw this at Harry Laibstain's Site selling for $775. I'm not buying it, but someone might want to pick it up. That seems like a fair price to me if you don't mind the cleaning. >>



    Who would pay $775 for that one when they could have this VF30 for just a few dollars more?

    image

    image


  • << <i>This is not meant to be disrespectful to PCGS, just an honest question. If this thing is so bady cleaned, then how does it end up in a PCGS holder? Does PCGS make exceptions for this series? If so, why? I agree that it is harshly cleaned...obviously so. Why didn't it get BB'd? >>



    I probably should keep my mouth shut. "God" might be watching.
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>This is not meant to be disrespectful to PCGS, just an honest question. If this thing is so bady cleaned, then how does it end up in a PCGS holder? Does PCGS make exceptions for this series? If so, why? I agree that it is harshly cleaned...obviously so. Why didn't it get BB'd? >>



    I probably should keep my mouth shut. "God" might be watching. >>



    Then PM me. I'm genuinely curious.
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>PCGS VF25. I saw this at Harry Laibstain's Site selling for $775. I'm not buying it, but someone might want to pick it up. That seems like a fair price to me if you don't mind the cleaning. >>



    Who would pay $775 for that one when they could have this VF30 for just a few dollars more?

    image

    image >>



    I wish I could see that picture (my work server blocks some pictures.) Also, when you say "just a few dollars more" where are you talking about buying from?
  • Its in my collection, and not currently for sale. But I paid $1,000 on it and have been nothing but happy with it.
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Its in my collection, and not currently for sale. But I paid $1,000 on it and have been nothing but happy with it. >>



    I would say that $225 is more than just "a few more dollars."


  • << <i>

    << <i>Its in my collection, and not currently for sale. But I paid $1,000 on it and have been nothing but happy with it. >>



    I would say that $225 is more than just "a few more dollars." >>




    When discussing two coins that cost 775 and 1000, 225 to me at least is just a few dollars. Likewise, two similar coins that are priced $78, and $100....I wont even hesitate to take the one with superior eye appeal.
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Its in my collection, and not currently for sale. But I paid $1,000 on it and have been nothing but happy with it. >>



    I would say that $225 is more than just "a few more dollars." >>




    When discussing two coins that cost 775 and 1000, 225 to me at least is just a few dollars. Likewise, two similar coins that are priced $78, and $100....I wont even hesitate to take the one with superior eye appeal. >>



    Like I said, I can't see the coin you posted here at work. I'll check it out at home. Eye appeal certainly does make a decision easier.

    But, you have to draw a line somewhere. I'm sure there is a VF35 somewhere that looks better than your coin, and I could say "Why would anyone pay $1000 for that when they could have gotten this for just a few dollars more."
  • Absolutely correct Joe. Lines need to be drawn and budgets maintained. I thought that my DBH was probably the most coin I could get for the grand, and a grand is what my target price for an example of this type was.
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Absolutely correct Joe. Lines need to be drawn and budgets maintained. I thought that my DBH was probably the most coin I could get for the grand, and a grand is what my target price for an example of this type was. >>



    I'm actually looking for a choice, original-looking F12 or 15. The more I look at these the more I realize eye appeal varies GREATLY from coin to coin.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,855 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Joe... you asked for an opinion and I would pass on this one. Be patient and look for better example. Not to bring up old issues, but coins in slabs that look like this is why there is a need for an original surfaces designation.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Bad pics Joe, but a real nice looking coin.
    image
    image
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • I do think PCGS and NGC make exceptions with series like those and such, except I think they let this one slide too much. Not sure though, as I am no expert.

    Phoenix image
    "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is."
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,090 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PCGS and NGC allow coins of this era to be certified even when they have significant enough manipulation that would preclude the certification of latter-date coins such as late-nineteenth century pieces or later. I agree with gecko109 that his coin has appeared to retone much more than the piece linked in the first post and I find his piece to be more appealing for that reason. It is too bad you are entering this niche today and not a few years ago since you may have been able to purchase something like this PCGS VF30 1805 for only $400-
    image
    image
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file