Home U.S. Coin Forum

PCGS First Strike for half dollars

jessewvujessewvu Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭✭✭
Does PCGS offer the First Strike designation on all US Mint coins within the first 30 days of first sale or do they pick and choose which coins they will give the First Strike Designation for. I was wondering about getting a first strike designation on the three Bald eagle coins coming out next week, the $5 gold, $1 silver, and clad half dollar...

Comments

  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No.

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • i think its only on bullion, not commems
    my ebay items BST transactions/swaps/giveaways with: Tiny, raycyca,mrpaseo, Dollar2007,Whatafind, Boom, packers88, DBSTrader2, 19Lyds, Mar327, pontiacinf, ElmerFusterpuck.


  • << <i>i think its only on bullion, not commems >>


    They also offered the First StrikeSM designation on the Presidential Proofs. I believe that is the only non-bullion coin they have offered the designation for. PCGS does classify the First Spouse coins as gold commemoratives and does offer the First StrikeSM designation on them.
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • tahoe98tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭


    does the so called first strike bring more money? i can't see any logic in building a set..............course that's

    just me.image
    "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington


  • << <i>does the so called first strike bring more money? i can't see any logic in building a set..............course that's

    just me.image >>


    I like them, and I suppose the collectors that pay big money for them do to. But that's just me image
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No - thank God.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • jessewvujessewvu Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Why not? What are they protecting by not giving the first strike designation on all US Mint coins? How is one coin more deserving of it than another? You would think it people were willing to pay for it, why not?

    In addition, the last time I checked, isn't the mint making a whole lot of commemorative coins now-a-days? It doesn't take a Harvard business grad to realize there is a lot of money to be made by charging $10 for a .01 cent color label.

    PCGS screams consistency in their grades but they are not very consistent at all in their business practices. JMHO
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,503 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>does the so called first strike bring more money? i can't see any logic in building a set..............course that's

    just me.image >>



    Some are willing to pay more just for the label since a coin that is minted all year long (i.e. SAE's in BS and Proof) only wualify for the label during the first 30 days of release. Thta means that there are potentially less of the First Strike slabs than regular BS slabs.

    Yes, I have First Strike™ SAE's and I like em.

    Well.........the ones with the milk spots really suck but the clean ones are cool!
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • JimDepotJimDepot Posts: 960 ✭✭✭
    "Well.........the ones with the milk spots really suck but the clean ones are cool! "

    image
    image

  • tahoe98tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭


    image
    "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
  • fcfc Posts: 12,804 ✭✭✭
    down with "first strike"!
  • GemineyeGemineye Posts: 5,374


    << <i>Why not? What are they protecting by not giving the first strike designation on all US Mint coins? How is one coin more deserving of it than another? You would think it people were willing to pay for it, why not? >>



    In order for a coin to qualify for First Strike™ means I cannot open the package from the mint ...meaning that I am NOT allowed to look at the coins I have just recieved and purchased and they must be submitted at some given time etc... or whatever..
    The mint has issued a time disclaimer for these coins of their mintage.Only shipping matters........Sooooo........!!!!!....ask yourself ?!?!?!
    ......Larry........image


  • << <i>

    << <i>Why not? What are they protecting by not giving the first strike designation on all US Mint coins? How is one coin more deserving of it than another? You would think it people were willing to pay for it, why not? >>



    In order for a coin to qualify for First Strike� means I cannot open the package from the mint ...meaning that I am NOT allowed to look at the coins I have just recieved and purchased and they must be submitted at some given time etc... or whatever..
    The mint has issued a time disclaimer for these coins of their mintage.Only shipping matters........Sooooo........!!!!!....ask yourself ?!?!?! >>


    Not exactly correct on all points. For most issues, you can pre-screen your coins as long as they are postmarked to PCGS by the First StrikeSM cutoff and they will still be eligible for the First StikeSM designation. The anniversary sets are the exception since they contain a coin that was released earlier in the year and in order to qualify for the First StrikeSM anniversary designation on the anniversary set coin it must be in a sealed set since it can be switched with the one released earlier in the year by the Mint.
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • GemineyeGemineye Posts: 5,374
    Thanks ..FLBuffaloHunter..for info...
    ......Larry........image


  • << <i>

    << <i>i think its only on bullion, not commems >>


    They also offered the First StrikeSM designation on the Presidential Proofs. I believe that is the only non-bullion coin they have offered the designation for. PCGS does classify the First Spouse coins as gold commemoratives and does offer the First StrikeSM designation on them. >>




    I really wish that PCGS would do the right thing and pull these out of the commemorative series for the rgistry. They really are nothing more than bullion, akin to the Gold Buffaloes...

    We go along for 20 years and get a gold commemorative or two every year (sometimes skip a year), and keeping up with the series and registry is doable for the average collector. Now PCGS lumps these bullion coins in the mix and very few can ever hope to complete the gold commemorative series.

    JMHO
    Luck happens when preparation meets opportunity.


  • << <i>Why not? What are they protecting by not giving the first strike designation on all US Mint coins? How is one coin more deserving of it than another? You would think it people were willing to pay for it, why not?

    In addition, the last time I checked, isn't the mint making a whole lot of commemorative coins now-a-days? It doesn't take a Harvard business grad to realize there is a lot of money to be made by charging $10 for a .01 cent color label.

    PCGS screams consistency in their grades but they are not very consistent at all in their business practices. JMHO >>




    What??????? (4) Commemorative quarters per year, (4) First Hag coins that get lumped into the commemorative program, (1) Gold Buffalo that commemorates and earlier coin design, the actual commemorative coin program that puts out 3-6 coins per year. Seem like a ton of commemorative overload to me.

    OH BTW, lets not forget every piece of circulating coinage that commeorates soem long dead president.
    Luck happens when preparation meets opportunity.


  • << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>i think its only on bullion, not commems >>


    They also offered the First StrikeSM designation on the Presidential Proofs. I believe that is the only non-bullion coin they have offered the designation for. PCGS does classify the First Spouse coins as gold commemoratives and does offer the First StrikeSM designation on them. >>




    I really wish that PCGS would do the right thing and pull these out of the commemorative series for the rgistry. They really are nothing more than bullion, akin to the Gold Buffaloes...

    We go along for 20 years and get a gold commemorative or two every year (sometimes skip a year), and keeping up with the series and registry is doable for the average collector. Now PCGS lumps these bullion coins in the mix and very few can ever hope to complete the gold commemorative series.

    JMHO >>


    For the Registry, PCGS does list the First Spouse issues under gold bullion, the same as the Buffalo's and they are not part of the modern gold commemorative Registry set however in the population report they are listed together with the gold commemoratives
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • Thanks for the update FBH, you are a font of knowledge !!!!image
    Luck happens when preparation meets opportunity.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    First Strike for half dollars ??????


    Now I have to shower for even typing that slop........
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"


  • << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>i think its only on bullion, not commems >>


    They also offered the First StrikeSM designation on the Presidential Proofs. I believe that is the only non-bullion coin they have offered the designation for. PCGS does classify the First Spouse coins as gold commemoratives and does offer the First StrikeSM designation on them. >>




    I really wish that PCGS would do the right thing and pull these out of the commemorative series for the rgistry. They really are nothing more than bullion, akin to the Gold Buffaloes...

    We go along for 20 years and get a gold commemorative or two every year (sometimes skip a year), and keeping up with the series and registry is doable for the average collector. Now PCGS lumps these bullion coins in the mix and very few can ever hope to complete the gold commemorative series.

    JMHO >>


    For the Registry, PCGS does list the First Spouse issues under gold bullion, the same as the Buffalo's and they are not part of the modern gold commemorative Registry set however in the population report they are listed together with the gold commemoratives >>



    They are also listed in the price guides in the commemorative section. PCGS is keeping these cousins so close that it would be illegal in some states.
    Luck happens when preparation meets opportunity.
  • Why would anyone care, when "First Strike" does not actually mean that the coin was an early strike? I still cannot understand how the premier numismatic authentication, grading and certification company in the world could have chosen to pervert a well-established numismatic term that has always had a very specific meaning, and turn it into a mere a commercial label with no merit other than its appeal to collectors' weakness for wanting every possible attribute and special feature available.

    I am a vocal supporter of PCGS, and ALL of my coins are in PCGS holders. However, I continue to object to the misuse of the term "First Strike."

    Best,
    Sunnywood


  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Jesse,

    Seems like only yesterday (well, 12/19) that you said you were getting out of coins and selling them all off?

    Cool if you got back into them...just seemed like a quick in and out

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well stated Sunnywood.... Cheers, RickO
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    I like the FIRST STRIKE designations especially on bullion coins. Call me biased. image
  • Griv,

    Maybe you can help me to understand this, because obviously I must be missing something ... why do you like them, when they aren't necessarily "first strikes" from from the dies, and in fact you have no idea what percentager of the total mintage might have been struck prior to the release period. Why does this "early release" mean anything to you, when there is no actual difference in the coins themselves?

    Best,
    Sunnywood
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sunnywood - well stated on your last posts.

    I also do not understand why people "like" the First Strikes when we all know they are only first releases and have nothing to do with actual first strikes off of a set a dies.

    Perhaps people like the holder insert, go figure.

    I continue to advise people not to pay a premium for a First Strike coin - I'll stick to that forever.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file