Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I really hate people that intentionally try to deceive

Not only didn't this seller put OC in the title, but he/she doesn't put it in the description either. This jackass even paid for a subtitle to give the low pop numbers of the card. I hope no one sets a snipe without looking at the scan because thats the only place to see that the card has an OC qualifier.

Link

Comments

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    How about this one?

    1955 Topps All-American #16 Knute Rockne PSA 8

    image

    There so many inaccuracies, my head is spinning.

    It's malicious misleading.

    BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • rube26105rube26105 Posts: 10,225 ✭✭
    i got a 82 pete rose 9oc in title, it sucks to, lol,i i got it on for 2.50 right now lol, a 9 oc is a 7,so that just knocks em in the head,that knute is pretty nice,still crooked though, they can read oc on it though, i can ,thats why nobody wants my petes thught or 83 sandberg,at least mines in the title though, im not a crook image
  • jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    He sold the same off-center Burda card with the same deceptive listing 12/5 for $14.49. Looking at his auctions it's a habit for him. Burda closed auction
    image
  • rube26105rube26105 Posts: 10,225 ✭✭
    ha by crackey it is jim lolimage
  • JmnesqJmnesq Posts: 251 ✭✭


    << <i>Not only didn't this seller put OC in the title, but he/she doesn't put it in the description either. This jackass even paid for a subtitle to give the low pop numbers of the card. I hope no one sets a snipe without looking at the scan because thats the only place to see that the card has an OC qualifier.

    Link >>



    If someone buys the card without looking at the scan, they deserve what they get. It IS a PSA 9. He just neglected to list more of the details.

    Arm's length, buyer beware, etc.
    Jeff

    Collecting Bowman Chrome Phillies Rookie Cards and Mike Schmidt certified auto cards.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    If a person bought that Burda card for true 9 money he/she would not be obligated to complete the deal.

    The card is not a mint 9 card, nor is it a 1 of 8


    Card not as described.





    Steve
    Good for you.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If someone buys the card without looking at the scan, they deserve what they get. It IS a PSA 9. He just neglected to list more of the details.

    Arm's length, buyer beware, etc. >>



    Everything in life isn't cut and dry. Yes, the buyer should look at the scan but that's no excuse for the Seller to try pulling a fast one.

    It's false and intentionally misleading advertising. A PSA 9's value is different from a PSA 9 OC. By stating this is a 1/8, he is representing it's a 9. Per the prop report, there's eight 9s and four 9 OCs.

    Since you have "esq" after your name, I assume you are a lawyer? If so, you should know better.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • JmnesqJmnesq Posts: 251 ✭✭


    << <i>If a person bought that Burda card for true 9 money he/she would not be obligated to complete the deal.

    The card is not a mint 9 card, nor is it a 1 of 8


    Card not as described.





    Steve >>



    But the picture certainly describes the card perfectly. If there's a conflict, the buyer should resolve the conflict before buying.
    Jeff

    Collecting Bowman Chrome Phillies Rookie Cards and Mike Schmidt certified auto cards.
  • chaz43chaz43 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Not only didn't this seller put OC in the title, but he/she doesn't put it in the description either. This jackass even paid for a subtitle to give the low pop numbers of the card. I hope no one sets a snipe without looking at the scan because thats the only place to see that the card has an OC qualifier.

    [L

    =Link]http://cgi.ebay.com/1972-Topps-Bob-Burda-734-PSA-9-MINT-HI-Low-Pop-1-8_W0QQitemZ270195236162QQihZ017QQcategoryZ55925QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem[/L] >>




    Nam- stop hating. chaz
  • carew4mecarew4me Posts: 3,667 ✭✭✭✭
    nam812

    ...you sound like a nanny-state liberal.

    you bring shame to your avatar.

    Pic provided......Buyer Beware!

    Loves me some shiny!

    “Often wrong, but never in doubt.”


  • << <i>It's false and intentionally misleading advertising. A PSA 9's value is different from a PSA 9 OC. By stating this is a 1/8, he is representing it's a 9. Per the prop report, there's eight 9s and four 9 OCs. >>




    I guess his listing is wrong, the card really is a 1/4..............image
  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,608 ✭✭✭✭✭
    chaz & carew4me, two morons sticking up for a scammer. image


  • << <i>chaz & carew4me, two morons sticking up for a scammer. image >>



    nam,

    please quit bumping up your posts.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭

    But the picture certainly describes the card perfectly. If there's a conflict, the buyer should resolve the conflict before buying.


    Yes that is true, what happens if the photo is red x'd out? Certaintly that can happen for those that self host.


    Card is not as described, therefore a person would not have to complete that deal if he/she chose not to. And if they did choose to I would imagine ebay/paypal would back them too.


    Whatever happened to the 'meeting of the minds' spiel you used to advocate? Surely they are not meeting in this case.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,608 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Whatever happened to the 'meeting of the minds' spiel you used to advocate?

    Steve >>



    Who was that addressed to?
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    ummmm the person i quoted?


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • rube26105rube26105 Posts: 10,225 ✭✭
    i met my mind once,man the 60s was funimage
    thanx dr leary
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    So it's okay to maliciously attempt to deceive someone as long as there's a picture?

    : sighs :
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • carew4mecarew4me Posts: 3,667 ✭✭✭✭
    maliciously attempt to deceive someone

    Someone was a drama major.



    Nam...stop creating pointless threads looking for attention.

    "Citizens arrest...... Citizens arrest" image

    Loves me some shiny!

    “Often wrong, but never in doubt.”


  • << <i>So it's okay to maliciously attempt to deceive someone as long as there's a picture?

    : sighs : >>



    of course!!

    what would people talk about on here otherwise??
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>So it's okay to maliciously attempt to deceive someone as long as there's a picture?

    : sighs : >>



    of course!!

    what would people talk about on here otherwise?? >>



    True, this place would become a ghost town.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • GDM67GDM67 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>It's false and intentionally misleading advertising. A PSA 9's value is different from a PSA 9 OC. By stating this is a 1/8, he is representing it's a 9. Per the prop report, there's eight 9s and four 9 OCs. >>




    I guess his listing is wrong, the card really is a 1/4..............image >>

    image Exactly what I was thinking.

    I can't believe this spud missed the opportunity to use that as a selling point.
Sign In or Register to comment.