Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

The time has come and we need a change!

I really enjoy this site and I totally respect the classic collectors but isn’t it time we just separate the good, the bad and the ugly?

I haven’t experienced a modern coin thread where there wasn’t a majority of posters that didn’t even collect those coins but yet posted endless attacks on that thread.

I think the time has com to separate the classics from the moderns and even the “so called” ultra moderns into separate forums. It is apparent that the crusty old farts will always feel the need to post crap since the thread titles are in one spot and these farts can’t help but pass gas.

I am tired of being attacked by bitter old buffoons that seem to think their crusty, corroded pieces of yesteryear is the end all be all in coin collecting. Farts is a totally excellent description here. Did I say stinky? Sorry, you might want to hold your breath if you can.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    DUIGUYDUIGUY Posts: 7,252 ✭✭✭
    What fun would that be? image
    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."



    - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    FUN? Do you think it is fun to be called a pig? Err I mean a swine, hmmm maybe I got off on the wrong hoof, I mean foot here. image
  • Options
    TexastTexast Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭✭
    In the word's of Rodney King -"Cant we all just get along?"
    On BS&T Now: Nothing.
    Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up!
    Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
  • Options
    MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 9,246 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image I see this thread going 15 pages deep.

    I guess I'll start... I would not like to see the forum divided into two categories. It seems like there would be too much jumping back and forth and a person would miss a lot of information and posts. I enjoy seeing the modern posts as well as the old crusty ones. If I don't collect or don't care about a particular series, discussion or question I just stop reading and find another. I guess that's too simple for some. I can see your point however as I've read a few threads that seem to go on forever ... back and forth between the haters and defenders.
  • Options
    BBNBBN Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭
    I'm into the oldie coins myself and I'm only 37, but to each their own. A separate modern forum would be a good idea.

    Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin

    #1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Griv---Suggest you add a poll to your first post.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,020 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You know, I think the idea has merit. World Coins and US Coins are segregated by interest. Why not classic and modern, amongst the US coins?

    More than a method of preventing squabbles, I think of it in practical terms. Those with particular interests will be able to more easily find threads that appeal to them.

    I personally prefer classic to modern, but will be the first to admit that modern coins have their good qualities, too. Cladking taught me well.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I really enjoy this site and I totally respect the classic collectors but isn’t it time we just separate the good, the bad and the ugly?

    I haven’t experienced a modern coin thread where there wasn’t a majority of posters that didn’t even collect those coins but yet posted endless attacks on that thread.

    I think the time has com to separate the classics from the moderns and even the “so called” ultra moderns into separate forums. It is apparent that the crusty old farts will always feel the need to post crap since the thread titles are in one spot and these farts can’t help but pass gas.

    I am tired of being attacked by bitter old buffoons that seem to think their crusty, corroded pieces of yesteryear is the end all be all in coin collecting. Farts is a totally excellent description here. Did I say stinky? Sorry, you might want to hold your breath if you can. >>

    seems like your really concerned about farts. maybe a better idea is a separate forum for the lactose intolerant.

    K S
  • Options
    IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    What we don't need is two coin forums. What we do need is to stop whining about folks here criticizing moderns. I collect across the board, moderns, classics. tokens and world coins. Its not always the old guys that that curl up their lip at what you collect. I've been at shows and seen plenty of 20 and 30 somethings eager to hand out collecting advice or totally disinterested in moderns and its obvious by their expressions. What we don't need is more of these silly threads. Learn to ignore and keep collecting what you enjoy. Get some starch in your diapers while you're at it too. image
  • Options
    dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    xlnt post.

    btw, not that it matters, but it just so happens that I DO COLLECT silver eagles.

    but not once have i EVER whined & complained about how ngc or pcgs grades 'em.

    K S
  • Options
    Only a few people truly bash moderns as a whole. I just bash 70s. image
  • Options
    keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i think it's just time that some collector/dealer members here just learn some restraint.

    image
  • Options
    53BKid53BKid Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭
    Seems to me that this may have been brought up once or twice before.
    HAPPY COLLECTING!!!
  • Options
    Be careful what you wish for...

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Over the years, this has been brought up several times... either by elitists or those with thin skins wanting to avoid the 'barbs' of the aforementioned. Each time, the proposal has fizzled... as it should. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    no to the diffrent boards. maybe ok to you computer exp. but i do good to find my way around now, lol but to name calling.
    just remember the old saying. names never hurt you.
    you can call me anything you want, i dont care. ((just dont call me late for dinner )))

    hope every one had a awesome Thanksgiving

    john
    References

    Loe-steelielee-bought 690. sale
    nate-grandrapidian-bought 70. sale
    Paul-commoncents-3500+ sales
    Ken-jfoot-sold-125.00 sale
    Mike-mozeppa-bought 1080. sale
    Dave-Badger-sale 560.00
    Lochness-sale 1,000. 00
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That'd be great!

    Into the bourbon again?
  • Options


    << <i> It is apparent that the crusty old farts will always feel the need to post crap since the thread titles are in one spot and these farts can’t help but pass gas.

    I am tired of being attacked by bitter old buffoons that seem to think their crusty, corroded pieces of yesteryear is the end all be all in coin collecting. Farts is a totally excellent description here. Did I say stinky? Sorry, you might want to hold your breath if you can. >>



    That class you took in public relations is really working out.

    I just love how you want respect for moderns while bashing both "crusty"/non-modern coins and collectors of said coins. Do you honestly think that p*ssing on a set of collectors is the best way to get their respect?

    If you split the forum in to moderns and classic coins will the next split involve "original" classics and "cleaned/AT" classics?
    In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.
  • Options
    MesquiteMesquite Posts: 4,075 ✭✭✭
    I see no virtue in subdividing the US Coins forum. I enjoy seeing the coins and reading the stories behind someone's find or purchase - old or new. I thoroughly enjoy viewing someone's beautifully "tarnished coin", regardless of grade or age. And, frankly, I don't let a negative opinion of toning affect my enjoyment of gorgeously toned coins; as I am sure my appreciation of toners does not affect someone else’s distain for them. I appreciate most comments regarding numismatic issues or coin specifics, regardless of the buffoonery that may be intertwined with those comments in any given thread. All of it makes me evaluate my own thinking on issues I might not otherwise have considered. If we all "got along" and shared similar opinions on all of the issues then the place would not live up to its potential to keep us fresh, learning and growing in the hobby. It is better that we develop somewhat thickened skins and simply agree to disagree on some issues.
    There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.
    –John Adams, 1826
  • Options
    It is possible (technically speaking) to have everyone create a profile of the coins they are interested in and then filter out those posts about coins that you are not interested in. You also create a "blocked list" of people that annoy you and have the software filter out their posts as well. When I say filter, I just mean that it wouldn't show up in your own view not the general one (or a view all function).

    The funny thing about that capability is that some people would only see theirown posts that way!

    I do not expect PCGS to pay for that programming for a free forum, but it is possible to do.
    I'd keep playing. I don't think the heavy stuff will be coming down for quite a while!
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    There is certainly some actual modern-bashing going on -- which is unfortunate that people can't live and let live when it comes to what we collect -- but more often than not I think it's thin-skinned folks interpreting a comment about one particular modern coin or the market for one particular modern coin and screaming about "modern-bashing." That's even more old and tired than the actual modern bashing, IMO.

    I don't think we need separate forums, but if it will stop all the whining about "modern bashing" when someone criticizes ONE modern design or questions the crazy market for ONE particular modern bullion item, I'm all for it.
  • Options
    image
  • Options
    LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    So far, I have seen two posts started by griv and all I can determine by those posts is that he/she is a world class azz.

    Griv, go back to the bridge you crawled out from under.
  • Options


    << <i>Learn to ignore and keep collecting what you enjoy. Get some starch in your diapers while you're at it too. >>



    imageimage
    Ebay Seller I.D
    the_northern_trading_company
    ace@airadv.net
    imageimage
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I really enjoy this site and I totally respect the classic collectors but isn’t it time we just separate the good, the bad and the ugly?

    I haven’t experienced a modern coin thread where there wasn’t a majority of posters that didn’t even collect those coins but yet posted endless attacks on that thread.

    I think the time has com to separate the classics from the moderns and even the “so called” ultra moderns into separate forums. It is apparent that the crusty old farts will always feel the need to post crap since the thread titles are in one spot and these farts can’t help but pass gas.

    I am tired of being attacked by bitter old buffoons that seem to think their crusty, corroded pieces of yesteryear is the end all be all in coin collecting. Farts is a totally excellent description here. Did I say stinky? Sorry, you might want to hold your breath if you can. >>



    This suggestion has been made numerous times, I think it has some merit. However, your argument is weakened significantly by your obsession with flatulence and personally attacking members of the forum. In fact, based on your behavior, your position on the forum has been marginalized to the point that no matter what you say, hardly anyone would care. It is a shame because I think that you could have been a positive contributor if you had dropped the 'tude. image
  • Options
    wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 17,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Griv - Consider ericj96's thread - a perfect example of a rational, respectful discussion of "ultra modern" eagles (300+ posts).

    So, that type of discussion can take place here. It is frustrating when someone attacks a collecting area for the sake of attack and, yes, it rarely occurs with "classics". Oreville recently posted a thread on fractional gold - an area of collecting where the coins are practically being "given away" even after 100 years. Just ask Oreville in a PM about some of the "giveaways" recently at public auction. But, no one would ever consider going on a thread like that and attacking the gold coins (or the collectors who collect them) in a derogatory manner. Hopefully, the blanket attacks on various areas of moderns will dissapate in the months and years ahead as well.

    Wondercoin
    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • Options
    There are a lot of people here, and someone will find something wrong with everything and anything that you do or say. Some people do that just to irritate you or to see what your reaction will be. No biggie in my opinion. Happens every day somewhere or another.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Moderns are trash, and should come with a warning label.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    SilverstateSilverstate Posts: 1,537 ✭✭✭
    Leave it alone.
    I only jumped on this year on these forums.

    If you do not like a thread, don't respond.
    In fact, many bashing sessions ONLY get hotter when one/both won't, for the sake of PRIDE, let it go and not add fuel to the fire.

    ....always having to get the last word in.
    WOW, that sounded like a conversation I just had with my kids.

    So, If I collect Lincoln Cents from 1909 to date...Does that put me in both camps.
    The Large Cents, do make me a crusty old fart.
    The Presidential Dollars make me a cool modern type.
    My Buffalo Gold makes me some super modern crap collecting gold monger.

    I think I need a shower after talking about crusty and old...

    HELP!! I am getting more confused by the minute!!
    image


    Truthfully, I have really enjoyed these forums and dividing up the US COIN Forum would be like breaking up a family.
    The older sibllings going one way and the younger going another way.
    I vote leave it alone.

    What kind of family would we have if, we always got along?
    image
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Griv - I used to think you were full of crap, but I'm now really starting to like you. This board needs people like you to shake things up.

    image

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    MesquiteMesquite Posts: 4,075 ✭✭✭
    Russ .... I love you man.image
    There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.
    –John Adams, 1826
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Russ .... I love you man. >>



    I assume that's in a manly sort of way. Not that there'd be anything wrong with it if it weren't.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    DUIGUYDUIGUY Posts: 7,252 ✭✭✭


    << <i>FUN? Do you think it is fun to be called a pig? Err I mean a swine, hmmm maybe I got off on the wrong hoof, I mean foot here. image >>




    I've bin called many things here, but none of my bones have bin broken yet. image
    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."



    - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804


    << <i>In fact, based on your behavior, your position on the forum has been marginalized to the point that no matter what you say, hardly anyone would care. It is a shame because I think that you could have been a positive contributor if you had dropped the 'tude. image >>



    I agree. However being an old fart is not a bad thing. It's a lot better than being young worm food. And admittedly this thread is one of complete frustration as every single modern thread gets bashed endlessly like it's some kind of game with these guys. I have a lot of respect for classic collectors and think they have a lot more challenges in building their sets but I don't like to hear from these same people about what trash I collect.

    It boggles my mind that people actually resent what other people collect. I boggles my mind that people would not agree that bullion coins are coins despite the Congress creating them as coins. At times it grates on my nerves and yes, I get a tad mean in return but let me see some posts criticizing some of these modern bashers for starting the row in the first place.

    Maybe I’ll just start posting on every single classic thread to say that classic coins are trash and should have a warning label. I’d have every last old fart (not just half) up in arms but yet they do this every time. You guys need to grow up and quit being such jerks. image
  • Options
    MesquiteMesquite Posts: 4,075 ✭✭✭
    Yes, in a manly sort of way ... as in the beer commercial from the 90's. (I only want your beer).
    There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.
    –John Adams, 1826
  • Options
    pmacpmac Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭
    "I guess I'll start... I would not like to see the forum divided into two categories. It seems like there would be too much jumping back and forth and a person would miss a lot of information and posts. I enjoy seeing the modern posts as well as the old crusty ones. If I don't collect or don't care about a particular series, discussion or question I just stop reading and find another. I guess that's too simple for some. I can see your point however as I've read a few threads that seem to go on forever ... back and forth between the haters and defenders."

    Meltdown is right on with these comments. If you have something to add to a thread, then do so, but if its just to blast somebody's tastes in numismatics, then just read on. I enjoy hearing the opinions of all US collectors.
    Paul
  • Options
    BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭✭
    To the OP...."NO".

    This comes up every 6-12 months it seems.
    People always want to change the forum to suit themselves.

    Ignore the bashers. FC, dorkkarl, and the others. They have nothing better to do but blabble so they know they are still alive.

    There are many who start with moderns but learn about the classics from the same forum. That's a positive. The negative is morons that bash. The only thing on these forums that should be bashed are the so-called dollars image

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe I’ll just start posting on every single classic thread to say that classic coins are trash and should have a warning label. I’d have every last old fart (mot just half) up in arms but yet they do this every time. You guys need to grow up and quit being such jerks.

    Actually, my guess is that most would not bat an eye. Most collectors are comfortable in what they collect and do not feel they need the approval of others to justify. Tell me that Dahlonega gold is overrated/overpriced/not worth collecting or whatever? I will reply that if you feel that way, do not collect it. I will not get hysterical about it.

    The fact is, for some reason, anything that can be construed of criticism of anything post-1964 is labeled modern-bashing and treated as if it is personal. The fact is that I do not care for Vermont copper, braided hair large cents, classic head half eagles, 3 cent nickels, Barber halves, Morgan and Peace dollars, most classic commems, Kennedy halves, and platinum eagles. If I post that I do not like these coins/series, a collector who does like them should not feel that it is a personal attack. Similarly, I like draped bust silver, middle date large cents, shield nickels, early gold, southern gold, seated quarters and halves, Barber quarters, Walker halves, Frankies, many modern commems, and SAEs. If you tell me that I am wasting my time or money on early gold, I might tell you that I think you are wrong, but if you do not like these coins, stay away. I certainly won't call you a "young snot-nosed punk".

    The recurring "old fart" remark makes you look like an immature fool, and this is the last I will say on this matter. image
  • Options


    << <i> The only thing on these forums that should be bashed are the so-called dollars image >>


    image...What you talkin' about Bochy....?!?!?!?!
    ......Larry........image
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    RYK,

    You don't like Kennedys, but do like Frankies? Geez, are you stoned?

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>RYK,

    You don't like Kennedys, but do like Frankies? Geez, are you stoned?

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Not unless you are going to stone me. image
  • Options
    dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Ignore the bashers. FC, dorkkarl, and the others. They have nothing better to do but blabble so they know they are still alive.

    There are many who start with moderns but learn about the classics from the same forum. That's a positive. The negative is morons that bash. >>

    wow, another pearl of wisdom from the same "anti-bash" yakking baboon that wrote:



    << <i>Rick, can you please teach dorkkarl once his lobotamy is finished?
    His "people" skills need serious work
    --------
    Paleodale? Is that you? dorkkarl is the Paleodale alt? >>

    good grief.

    K S
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Actually, my guess is that most would not bat an eye. Most collectors are comfortable in what they collect and do not feel they need the approval of others to justify. Tell me that Dahlonega gold is overrated/overpriced/not worth collecting or whatever? I will reply that if you feel that way, do not collect it. I will not get hysterical about it. >>

    In fact, what you should be saying is "thank you for not increasing the competition to buy them. Can you please convince a few more people that these things suck so I can buy them more cheaply?"

  • Options
    Griv,

    It is funny how often you read through a thread about moderns and the same people post the fact that they don't collect those coins (or worse). It does get old, but these are not always "old farts". They can be "young punks" or anything in between. My guess is that some have no real social skills, so they hide behind their computer and try to "pick a fight" for their own entertainment. Some may suffer from memory loss and they forget that they have told everyone their opinion already.

    Some people are purist collectors and do not believe in selling coins (especially profitting from those sales) and since Modern coins are sold on TV, they are evil crap. Some are jealous because they can't afford some of the modern coins (gold and platinum especially).

    But most are nice people who offer an opinion (since the poster usually asks for one) and try to help. It is a public forum, so you have to take the good with the bad. The ones who are really bad get sent packing!
    I'd keep playing. I don't think the heavy stuff will be coming down for quite a while!
  • Options
    Change is Good.......


    I collect it......image


    Alan
  • Options
    dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭
    I kept looking for part of Griv's ramblings that I could quote and comment on, but there are just too many of them. I collect classic coins. I'm under 30 years old, but somehow, in Griv's World of Delusion, I'm an "old fart." Griv, all you've succeeded in doing with this thread is proving that you're not worth listening to. Have a nice day.

    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
  • Options
    cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Moderns are trash, and should come with a warning label.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Is that because they have noise in their sockets? image
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • Options
    tahoe98tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I really enjoy this site and I totally respect the classic collectors but isn’t it time we just separate the good, the bad and the ugly?

    I haven’t experienced a modern coin thread where there wasn’t a majority of posters that didn’t even collect those coins but yet posted endless attacks on that thread.

    I think the time has com to separate the classics from the moderns and even the “so called” ultra moderns into separate forums. It is apparent that the crusty old farts will always feel the need to post crap since the thread titles are in one spot and these farts can’t help but pass gas.

    I am tired of being attacked by bitter old buffoons that seem to think their crusty, corroded pieces of yesteryear is the end all be all in coin collecting. Farts is a totally excellent description here. Did I say stinky? Sorry, you might want to hold your breath if you can. >>




    i sense a revolution imageimage
    "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Geez, I kind of like the reoccurring “old fart” theme. The reality is being an “old fart” isn’t a physical age, it’s a state of mind so yes, you can be 25 years old and be an “old fart”. “Old farts” are judgmental, highly opinionated and closed to new concepts or ideas.

    That seems to fit a lot of people here bashing moderns so I’m not sure why it would be offending since it seems perfectly descriptive using the least number of words, plus it has a nice ring to it, but at the risk of pissing off the "non-old farts" I will let it go. Dang. image
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>“Old farts” are judgmental, highly opinionated and closed to new concepts or ideas. >>

    Does anyone else here appreciate the irony of this statement or is it just me?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file