Home U.S. Coin Forum

Any Interest in the KING of ASE's ( 1995-W) ?

There's been a lot of discussion about 2006-W & 2007-W ASE's lately. With mintages of 400,000 - 600,000 ( or thereabouts) they can't come close to the King.

Anyone looking to buy?



1995-W Proof Silver American Eagle


That's one purdy coin there. image

Comments

  • morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,500 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wish I had been into collecting in 95. What was the original cost?

    5 grand for an ounce of silver, hard to justify.

    There is always someone looking to buy one though.
    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    With a mere 30,125 (if my memory serves me)... that's a good starting price. 'tis the season for someone with cashflow and a brain.
  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭✭
    For that kind of money there are alot of other coins I would rather have.....
    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,993 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>For that kind of money there are alot of other coins I would rather have..... >>



    Well that depends on cashflow. I'd prefer the bi-metallic coin over this one image It's five years newer image
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,028 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What is the mintage on it? Why so expensive?
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Not with that milking around 7 O'clock that goes toward the center.

    With the milk spot issue I have lost interest in this series. I have a complete set minus the milk spots but it was difficult to find ones that did not develop the spots over time.
  • 57loaded57loaded Posts: 4,967 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Not with that milking around 7 O'clock that goes toward the center.

    With the milk spot issue I have lost interest in this series. I have a complete set minus the milk spots but it was difficult to find ones that did not develop the spots over time. >>



    that spotting is horrible...
  • CasmanCasman Posts: 3,935 ✭✭
    Ya but it's described as a spotless gem??
  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,160 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Not with that milking around 7 O'clock that goes toward the center.

    With the milk spot issue I have lost interest in this series. I have a complete set minus the milk spots but it was difficult to find ones that did not develop the spots over time. >>



    that spotting is horrible... >>



    image

    & the seller has the nerve of making the following statement: "THIS COIN IS A SPOTLESS GEM."
    Actually he is selling it at a discount ... I sold an MS68, with the Gold 69's for $6,200 about 6 to 7 month ago.
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,993 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, it looks like 5 to 1 against this coin. Maybe the seller should drop the price image
  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,160 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Well, it looks like 5 to 1 against this coin. Maybe the seller should drop the price image >>




    He should send it in for "spot review"image
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wish I had been into collecting in 95. What was the original cost?


    They were originally included as a bonus coin in the 1995 gold proof set, which sold for $995. (Those were the days!)

    The mintage limit was 45,000, but only a little over 30,000 were sold. An additional 10,000 or so gold proof sets were sold without the silver eagle.

    There were a lot of complaints at the time about having to buy the gold set to get the silver coin.

    For a while, the 1995-W silver eagle was available in the aftermarket for under $300!


  • I would say it might be reflection before spots

    Seller is a good guy. Very Straight in all my Deals. (5)

    Rich puts his number there in the Auction for a reason.

    Call and confirm before you burn.
  • meos1meos1 Posts: 1,135
    I had the whole series in MS and PR including the King with his court. It was really impressive, I turned up with a Milk Spot on the king. Needless to say, I got out and fast. I nearly doubled my money. I counted myself very lucky.

    I still love the design and have a few MS pieces but I don't hold the same regard for them. In a few decades perhaps the survivors will be stable but this coin will be out of sight expensive then.

    Dan
    I am just throwing cheese to the rats chewing on the chains of my sanity!

    First Place Winner of the 2005 Rampage design contest!
  • SoundPointSoundPoint Posts: 255 ✭✭✭


    << <i> Wish I had been into collecting in 95. What was the original cost?


    They were originally included as a bonus coin in the 1995 gold proof set, which sold for $995. (Those were the days!)

    The mintage limit was 45,000, but only a little over 30,000 were sold. An additional 10,000 or so gold proof sets were sold without the silver eagle.

    There were a lot of complaints at the time about having to buy the gold set to get the silver coin.

    For a while, the 1995-W silver eagle was available in the aftermarket for under $300! >>




    30,000+ were sold...... Don't forget that this set was well on its way to a sellout and IMHO, probably did sellout!!
    Unfortunately, the mint lost quite a few orders that were placed on the first day of ordering, April 21, 1995. If you didn't know the mint lost your order, you never received your set! I still wonder how many people were waiting to receive their sets, but never did. In my case, I didn't find out my order was lost until 10/5/95 when I called the mint to check on the status of my order. They had no record that my order was ever placed on 4/21/1995. I had to reorder! I imagine many people who placed orders on 4/21/1995 never had the opportunity to reorder because they didn't know the mint lost their orders (They were probably waiting for their orders to arrive all the way up to the time the Mint stopped taking orders). Consequently, only 30,000+ sets were sold in a mint offering that was probably sold out. We'll never know for sure how many orders the mint "lost" from April 21, 1995 (1st day of issue) until they fixed the problem.

    SoundPoint
  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 6,314 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I thought auctions of slabbed coins had to have a picture of the reverse of the slab?
    Many happy BST transactions
  • I've got one or more of those in the original holder buried in a bank vault ... maybe I should look at them someday !!!

    Sunnywood


  • << <i>Well, it looks like 5 to 1 against this coin. Maybe the seller should drop the price image >>



    Maybe he should get a sticker and raise the price.
    Crazy old man from Missouri
  • dpooledpoole Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>30,000+ were sold...... Don't forget that this set was well on its way to a sellout and IMHO, probably did sellout!!
    Unfortunately, the mint lost quite a few orders that were placed on the first day of ordering, April 21, 1995. If you didn't know the mint lost your order, you never received your set! I still wonder how many people were waiting to receive their sets, but never did. In my case, I didn't find out my order was lost until 10/5/95 when I called the mint to check on the status of my order. They had no record that my order was ever placed on 4/21/1995. I had to reorder! I imagine many people who placed orders on 4/21/1995 never had the opportunity to reorder because they didn't know the mint lost their orders (They were probably waiting for their orders to arrive all the way up to the time the Mint stopped taking orders). Consequently, only 30,000+ sets were sold in a mint offering that was probably sold out. We'll never know for sure how many orders the mint "lost" from April 21, 1995 (1st day of issue) until they fixed the problem.

    SoundPoint >>



    I never heard that story! I was definitely lucky, it looks like.

    I don't see any milk going on on this one. The Obv coloration has to do with the lighting, don't you think? Good price for this one....
  • lol.. sunny if you want to sell one for the original issue price just let me know..... I would send you a christmas card every year...:&gtimage
    my EBAY items
    Successful forum transactions: jessewvu, nankraut, tootawl, levinll, mistercoinman, metalsman, adamlaneus, chuckc, fivecents, kingplatinum, jdimmick, waterzooey, moderncoinmart, bige, steelielee,
  • SoundPointSoundPoint Posts: 255 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>30,000+ were sold...... Don't forget that this set was well on its way to a sellout and IMHO, probably did sellout!!
    Unfortunately, the mint lost quite a few orders that were placed on the first day of ordering, April 21, 1995. If you didn't know the mint lost your order, you never received your set! I still wonder how many people were waiting to receive their sets, but never did. In my case, I didn't find out my order was lost until 10/5/95 when I called the mint to check on the status of my order. They had no record that my order was ever placed on 4/21/1995. I had to reorder! I imagine many people who placed orders on 4/21/1995 never had the opportunity to reorder because they didn't know the mint lost their orders (They were probably waiting for their orders to arrive all the way up to the time the Mint stopped taking orders). Consequently, only 30,000+ sets were sold in a mint offering that was probably sold out. We'll never know for sure how many orders the mint "lost" from April 21, 1995 (1st day of issue) until they fixed the problem.

    SoundPoint >>



    I never heard that story! I was definitely lucky, it looks like.

    I don't see any milk going on on this one. The Obv coloration has to do with the lighting, don't you think? Good price for this one.... >>




    That story (of "lost" orders) didn't get the publicity it should have received.
    THE MINT LOST ORDERS STARTING ON THE FIRST DAY OF ISSUE. (4/21/1995)
    Numismatic News didn't start publishing items related to "vanishing" orders until October 1995.
    A few letters to the editor are documented in the 1995 NN issues dated 10/22, 11/7, 11/14, 11/21, and 12/5.

    And in the NN issue dated 1/9/1996, the following article entitled "Contractor's repeated slips make 500 Mint shipmints late", it discusses issues with problem orders with a US Mint contractor having problems with unfilled orders. The mint says it only affected items in the fall catalog; however, the letters to the editor in NN shows the problems existed as early as 4/21/1995.

    That coin issue should have sold out, but due to "lost" (vanishing / disappearing) orders from the mint, it didn't!

    SoundPoint

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file