I hope no one minds if I add one of my own to this thread. It has likely been shown before, but has 31(?) obverse chop marks and one reverse chop mark, though the other mark might also be a test mark. I like it because it has amazingly clean and original surfaces even with the chops.
Cracked this one out of an ANAC's holder and made it my pocket piece,
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."
A chop mark is a merchants statement saying this coin is silver and in the correct amount. Some counterfeits had the exact alloy of silver/copper and would also show chop marks.
So once the coin is filled up with chopmarks why did they continue to put them on? You can't possibly read anything out of that jumble so why did they keep putting mark on top of mark? Seems like a pointless exercise.
I recently submitted a 75 s with a single chopmark. PCGS graded it MS 63... It's probably one of the nicest ones you'll ever see. I'll try to post a pic of it soon.
I like TomB's dark, well-circulated piece. It managed to get chopped a bunch of times without losing all of its eye appeal. Neat coin.
They're all neat, but some of the really chopped-to-death ones don't appeal much to me.
I wouldn't mind having one with two or three discreet chops in the fields. I've never had any. I do have a counterstamped trade dollar on the Holey Coin Vest, but it has Roman alphabet letters on it (someone's initials, presumably).
<< <i>So once the coin is filled up with chopmarks why did they continue to put them on? You can't possibly read anything out of that jumble so why did they keep putting mark on top of mark? Seems like a pointless exercise. >>
Each port had an assayer that would certify the silver. I suppose some ports may have accepted the OK from another port, but I think the ones with a lot of chopmarks just made their way around.
Comments
-Paul
link
-Paul
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Very cool all
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
<< <i>What was the purpose of chop marks? >>
A chop mark is a merchants statement saying this coin is silver and in the correct
amount. Some counterfeits had the exact alloy of silver/copper and would also show
chop marks.
Proud recipient of two "You Suck" awards
<< <i>My Chopper, which graded PCGS MS-63:
Wow that one looks almost proof with no cameo.
It's probably one of the nicest ones you'll ever see.
I'll try to post a pic of it soon.
They're all neat, but some of the really chopped-to-death ones don't appeal much to me.
I wouldn't mind having one with two or three discreet chops in the fields. I've never had any. I do have a counterstamped trade dollar on the Holey Coin Vest, but it has Roman alphabet letters on it (someone's initials, presumably).
<< <i>So once the coin is filled up with chopmarks why did they continue to put them on? You can't possibly read anything out of that jumble so why did they keep putting mark on top of mark? Seems like a pointless exercise. >>
Each port had an assayer that would certify the silver. I suppose some ports may have accepted the OK from another port, but I think the ones with a lot of chopmarks just made their way around.