Very Disappointing First Strike ASE
I sent this coin in for a crossover from a ICG MS70 FS to PCGS ???.
I could tell the coin wasn't MS70-although I felt it was worthy of a 69. To My surprise the coin was awarded a MS67. Just shows that first strike really doesn't indicate a better coin.

I could tell the coin wasn't MS70-although I felt it was worthy of a 69. To My surprise the coin was awarded a MS67. Just shows that first strike really doesn't indicate a better coin.

Crazy old man from Missouri
0
Comments
To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
And the crossover grade from ICG? Doesn't surprise me at all.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
Box of 20
I agree with pf70!
I thought PCGS would NEVER, NEVER, NEVER do any type of cross-over on the trademarked First Strike!
Anyone have any writen PCGS information that says they would??
<< <i>First strike means first shipped. It has no relationship to actual first strikings.
And the crossover grade from ICG? Doesn't surprise me at all. >>
It is very possible that the spots formed while in the holder AFTER it was certified by ICG.
Do you have a picture of it in the ICG slab, or before it was slabbed by ICG ?
i have a 'gotta be proud low pop' reverse proof PR67DCAM, I might make a pocket watch face out of it as the milk is right dead centre obverse.
acetone get rid of that??
<< <i>milk happens b4 slabbing too.
i have a 'gotta be proud low pop' reverse proof PR67DCAM, I might make a pocket watch face out of it as the milk is right dead centre obverse.
acetone get rid of that?? >>
I've had much better luck with MS70 than acetone when it comes to milk spots. So far it's always worked for me, but I usually get rid of the coin fairly soon afterward so I can't speak to them returning at some later time.
John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
<< <i>With the reverse spotting, there's no way that coin deserves a 69. Is a PCGS 69 worth so much that the coin was worth crossing? >>
Plus the crap on the sun... that really looks like a typical silver eagle that has aged a few years and developed some spots.
But what surprises me more here, is that PCGS is recognizing ICG's First Strike coins and keeping the designation?
42/92
<< <i>I'd crack it out and acetone it. >>
That won't do squat for the coin. Once a milkspot has shown up, you're out of luck. It's there forever... unless you want to dig the metal that it's embedded into out of the coin...
42/92
<< <i>
<< <i>With the reverse spotting, there's no way that coin deserves a 69. Is a PCGS 69 worth so much that the coin was worth crossing? >>
Plus the crap on the sun... that really looks like a typical silver eagle that has aged a few years and developed some spots.
But what surprises me more here, is that PCGS is recognizing ICG's First Strike coins and keeping the designation? >>
That is very surprising. They even gave it the flag label!
<< <i>MS70 will remove it from the Proofs sometimes. From the MS they rarely come out ;( >>
It depends on the type of spot... a spot from a foreign material, like spit, yeah, you'll likely be able to get that kind of spot out... but a white milkspot is embedded in the surface of the coin. The soap residue has been fused to the surface of the coin.
42/92
<< <i>But what surprises me more here, is that PCGS is recognizing ICG's First Strike coins and keeping the designation? >>
What is also amazing is that PCGS does not accept 70's for a crossover submission since they can't determine if the coin will cross until it's removed from the holder. All in all a very 'amazing' submission
<< <i>Anybody wan't to see my expensive pocket piece? Originally a 2006-W First Strike© MS69. It started to develop a white film along the right edge which has now turned brown
Expsensive pocket piece. PCGS would have grade guaranteed that.....
As for the 1st strike thing crossing over.....maybe the OP will say when it was submitted to PCGS? If it was within time, they would do it (ie...first 30 days)
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>
<< <i>Anybody wan't to see my expensive pocket piece? Originally a 2006-W First Strike© MS69. It started to develop a white film along the right edge which has now turned brown
Expsensive pocket piece. PCGS would have grade guaranteed that.....
Yep, they did and also sent back the coin
<< <i>I am surprised that PCGS would crossover a first strike coin at all from ICG. I guess as long as they have the same definition for First Strike
I agree with pf70!
I thought PCGS would NEVER, NEVER, NEVER do any type of cross-over on the trademarked First Strike!
Anyone have any writen PCGS information that says they would?? >>
PCGS will honor the requirements for First Strike™ from another TPG.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>
<< <i>I am surprised that PCGS would crossover a first strike coin at all from ICG. I guess as long as they have the same definition for First Strike
I agree with pf70!
I thought PCGS would NEVER, NEVER, NEVER do any type of cross-over on the trademarked First Strike!
Anyone have any writen PCGS information that says they would?? >>
PCGS will honor the requirements for First Strike™ from another TPG.
Wow, a 1998 FS. Bet that would go for moon money.