Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Nother scammer in the making.

LeiascardsLeiascards Posts: 3,233
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Text

How many times is the seller gonna sell this card and mislead in the auction title....

Comments

  • Options
    metalmikemetalmike Posts: 2,152 ✭✭
    I disagree- the card is exactly as described...lol Yea the seller is kinda not lying- what if the holder has a scratch? The card looks great and presents well also. It sold exactly for what it is worth. P.S. at least it's not an In Action rookie?
    USN 1977-1987 * ALL cards are commons unless auto'd. Buying Britneycards. NWO for life.
  • Options
    nightcrawlernightcrawler Posts: 5,110 ✭✭
    That's a good lookin card. Not all OCs are ugly.
  • Options
    MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    I agree, thats a nice card that went for a good price to the bidder.

    Mark
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • Options
    StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    I would exactly call it a scammer, just not as descriptive as could have been.
  • Options
    Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭
    I have no issue with the way he's posted the auction either. The pic clearly displays the flic with the (OC) prominently on the front. I agree some OC are not bad. Here's one I originally picked up raw for $2.50 that I'm rather fond of.

    image
  • Options
    LeiascardsLeiascards Posts: 3,233
    You guys are missing the point. Let me show you in another way.

    Text
    The cert number is the same on all of them.

    Notice she has only gotten FB on ONE of those so far and it was a neg. Listing it as a 9 and not a 9 OC is deceptive.
  • Options
    PubliusPublius Posts: 1,306 ✭✭
    Wow
    6 auctions for Marino psa 9 OC, all with the same cert #, all ending really close to each other. This is a train wreck man. Good eye!!
    My Steve Largent Master Set
  • Options
    Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭


    << <i>You guys are missing the point. Let me show you in another way.

    Text
    The cert number is the same on all of them.

    Notice she has only gotten FB on ONE of those so far and it was a neg. Listing it as a 9 and not a 9 OC is deceptive. >>



    Ahh.
  • Options
    bigdcardsbigdcards Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭
    This is besides the main point, I guess. But, I just hate bait and switch. If scam is too harsh of a word, then it is infinitely close to a scam. The grade is 9 (OC), he advertised a 9. Just because it becomes clear later doesn't change his initial lie about his product. It's spamming on top of it. Bad seller, plain and simple. Honest people don't do this.


    To bigdcards: "you are right" - cpamike "That is correct" -grote15
  • Options
    digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    Check out the feedback this seller's left. He accuses the buyer who left a neg of being a scammer.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • Options
    StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    Did not realize that about the Marino card, I wonder what is going to happen to all those who won auctions for the same card??
Sign In or Register to comment.