Options
Still cant land that P01, Two new coins for my low grade type set
jabba
Posts: 3,168 ✭✭✭✭✭
Still trying to land a P01 may be next time.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/publishedset/209923
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/album/209923
0
Comments
I like 'em.
-------------
etexmike
Clearly, I need to attend an ANA grading seminar to get my chops up on the PO-FR-AG grades.....or be left in the dust once again.
roadrunner
<< <i>The Walker is undergraded. Sure looks full AG to me. >>
I was thinking the same thing.
There are clearly no PO-01's in that group. The 1877-S reverse needs to be more worn for the full PO-01 grade.
<< <i>The Walker is undergraded. Sure looks full AG to me. >>
<< <i>The TPG's are gonna start holding back on the PO1 grades >>
Already started at PCGS.
This 81CC came back as a FR2 about 3 weeks ago. Already cracked out and on its ways back.
It's a slider as a 1 because of the uneven wear pattern. Heavy PO1 wear at the bottom with well worn barely discernable date but average FR2 wear at the top.
My #1 Low Ball Peace Dollar Set
Its usually the reverses on the seated halves that get ya.....the obv on that coin is fine bt its the reverse that brings the grade p.
Keep on gettin' down!
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
My Odds&Ends eBay Stuff to fuel my coin habit (No Coins)
<< <i>
<< <i>The Walker is undergraded. Sure looks full AG to me. >>
I was thinking the same thing.
There are clearly no PO-01's in that group. The 1877-S reverse needs to be more worn for the full PO-01 grade. >>
Accept on the other side of the coin, it would grade the lower of the two sides. It seems on the lower grades, the higher of the two sides prevail. What a scam!