Any possibility for a high relief gold eagle to mark the 100th Anniversary of the St. Gaudens?

I think it would be great for the US Mint to issue a high relief Gold Eagle to mark the 100th Anniversary of the St. Gaudens Double Eagle. Since the coin's desing would not change, the mint wouldn't need approval from congress to do this. A high relief coin would be an instant sellout! Any thoughts?
GUINZO1975
0
Comments
I'm all for it..... It's one of the most beautiful coins ever made.......
<< <i>The mint has the original high relief models – they’re stuck in a basement vault in Philadelphia. >>
Sounds like it's time for a midnight minter to get inspired
<< <i>
<< <i>The mint has the original high relief models – they’re stuck in a basement vault in Philadelphia. >>
Sounds like it's time for a midnight minter to get inspired
At this point that's the only way to make this happen.
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
You are a year too late, all of the planning has to happen.
On the other hand this is by far one of the best ideas I have heard in a while. I thought that the original double eagle was ruined when they went to the low relief an if I were ever to own a double eagle it would be the beautiful high relief. I don't like the new eagles either.
I agree that the high relief - which was Saint-Gaudens' best and final concept for the double eagle during his lifetime - could have easily been re-released with just a change of date on new hubs. A large sell out to coin collectors would have been likely, but.... A further suggestion made more than 2 years ago was to display all of the original models and examples of the coins at the Milwaukee ANA show. This could have been a huge draw and a major traveling exhibit if the SGNHS, Mint and Smithsonian could have cooperated, but.....
The ASBs were done by the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian. There was probably no group to push for HR Saint tribute coins and/or collectors didn't care enough as suggested above.
It's a magnificent example of coin/medallic art........ Of course I would prefer it as a double eagle.......... Maybe do a double set along with the eagle......
<< <i>
<< <i>The mint has the original high relief models – they’re stuck in a basement vault in Philadelphia. >>
Sounds like it's time for a midnight minter to get inspired
Hmm...
Maybe I should change my business name to "The Midnight Mint"
I've actually been thinking of minting a 2007 "tribute" to the original 1907 St. Gaudens $20.
Who wants to loan me a high-relief St. Gaudens for use as a pattern ?
<< <i>I think it would be great for the US Mint to issue a high relief Gold Eagle to mark the 100th Anniversary of the St. Gaudens Double Eagle. Since the coin's desing would not change, the mint wouldn't need approval from congress to do this. A high relief coin would be an instant sellout! Any thoughts? >>
they will mint to demand for that one too.
Actually a fantastic thought....
<< <i>Britain still mints sovereigns and they sell very well. >>
Anywhere near as well as AGEs? I'd be pretty surprised if that were the case.
RWB explained in depth how these were made at the last ANA. They had to strike them a gazillion times and anneal them between strikes. It sounded very painful
Will not happen.
I sure would like to be wrong, though.
Maybe we should try to get the ANA and some of the large coin venues to petition congress on this
Do it right.
Back in 1907 the mint faced formidable challenges in getting the High Relief St. Gaudens $20 gold coins into production. It took three blows from the dies to get the design fully struck up. Between each of those blows the partially struck coins had to be heated or annealed in order to soften up the gold for the next strike. Production was divided into lots of 1,000 coins. The concern was if either the obverse or reverse dies were to break during the three strike process, using a new die would result in doubled or indistinct images. By segregating the coins into lots, there was less chance of “orphaned coins” that could not be completed using the same die pair.
The mint had to operate 24-7, and it took about a month to produce the total mintage of 12,367 coins. When it was over two things had been proven. Teddy Roosevelt had gotten his “pet baby,” the high relief coinage, and it was as beautiful as he envisioned it. Conversely the expense of producing the coins and the added production space that the mint would have needed to have continued to produce them proved that the High Relief coins were totally impractical for business strike coinage.
Two other nails were driven into the High Relief coffin once the coins went out to the banks. First, bankers complained that the coins would not stack, which it made difficult to count them. Second, the coins were almost immediately withdrawn from circulation, and within a year, they were selling for more than their face value to collectors and non-collectors.
In short, the High Relief $20 gold pieces were an artistic triumph, but a commercial failure.
<< <i>I'm all for it, plus it gives collectors a chance to own a classic, can't afford the real thing. >>
I think that you would be amazed at how much the mint would have to charge for it given the high price of gold plus the high production costs. Check out my previous message. This coin would be priced like a Cadillac, not a Chevy.