Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

I guess these 1964 proof sets are VERY early strikes.

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
I purchased these Proof Sets from the US Mint 10/31/63 for $2.10 each.

I think this is clear evidence that JFK's assassination was, indeed, a government conspiracy. Even the mint was in on it.

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • Options
    So, what amount are you going to enter on your snipe? image
    FULL Heads RULE!
  • Options


    << <i>I purchased these Proof Sets from the US Mint 10/31/63 for $2.10 each.

    I think this is clear evidence that JFK's assassination was, indeed, a government conspiracy. Even the mint was in on it.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    I thought that the mint did not seal proof sets from 1961or 1962-1964. How come your sets are sealed I really dont understand this.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>So, what amount are you going to enter on your snipe? >>



    If I was planning a bid, I wouldn't have posted a link.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,902 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe he can get First Strike™ on them.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I thought that the mint did not seal proof sets from 1961or 1962-1964. >>



    The mint did seal proof sets. They didn't seal mint sets. That said, the vast majority of "mint sealed" proof sets on eBay are picked over repacks.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    skier07skier07 Posts: 4,857 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If he purchased them when he said he did, didn't he buy them thinking the halves would be Franklins?

    Assuming Kennedy wasn't assassinated would not have the Franklins continued to be made?

    Bruce
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If he purchased them when he said he did, didn't he buy them thinking the halves would be Franklins? >>



    I sent him an eMail noting that they couldn't be 1964 proof sets with that purchase date since Kennedy wasn't assasinated until 11/22/63. His response was:



    << <i>THE ENVELOPES ARE MARKED 1964 P.C.
    TREASURY DEPARTMENT
    UNITED STATES MINT
    PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19130 >>



    So, either his memory isn't so good or he's full of crap.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,538 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>If he purchased them when he said he did, didn't he buy them thinking the halves would be Franklins? >>



    I sent him an eMail noting that they couldn't be 1964 proof sets with that purchase date since Kennedy wasn't assasinated until 11/22/63. His response was:



    << <i>THE ENVELOPES ARE MARKED 1964 P.C.
    TREASURY DEPARTMENT
    UNITED STATES MINT
    PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19130 >>



    So, either his memory isn't so good or he's full of crap.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    or really stupid to be unable to draw the conclusion that is so obvious
  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,337 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A couple of plausible scenarios..............One, the guy is a liar. ( Most Likely considering his purchase date is about 3 weeks before JFK was assasinated.) Two, He placed an order for 10 1964 Proof sets expecting Franklin halves, and then his order was delayed do to the assasination and ended up getting the Kennedy halves.

    Considering it wasn't until March of 64 before the Kennedy halves were ready for release, I wonder why no Franklin halves were minted in the first 2 months of 64. Maybe some retired mint employee has a few 64 Franklins stashed away.

    JJ
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,728 ✭✭✭✭
    The envelopes look TOO good for 40+ years old.

    With coin hoarding at an all-time frenzy back then, the October part is wrong also - whether he meant 1963 or 1964.image

    Joe
    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • Options
    CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
    He may indeed have purchased those sets in October 1963. As I recall, back in the late 60's the Mint began accepting orders for proof sets in October of year before the sets were struck. And then it took many months to get the coins If that practice was in place in 1963, he would have ordered his 1964 sets in October 1963.

    CG
  • Options
    RWBRWB Posts: 8,082 ✭
    The Kennedy half was approved in late December 1963. No Franklin halves were produced dated 1964.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>No Franklin halves were produced dated 1964. >>



    Are you sure?

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,728 ✭✭✭✭
    Assuming these are genuine envelopes, I believe the early batches of proof sets had the old zone designation, "Philadelphia 30, PA" which was changed to :"Philadelphia, PA 19130" later in 1964.

    Joe
    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,337 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The Kennedy half was approved in late December 1963. No Franklin halves were produced dated 1964. >>



    I know that, but no kennedy coins were released to circulation until March. Prior to 64 with the Kennedy hoarding, halves were used in commerce like any other coin and were subject to shortages.


    JJ
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    seanqseanq Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>[


    << <i>THE ENVELOPES ARE MARKED 1964 P.C.
    TREASURY DEPARTMENT
    UNITED STATES MINT
    PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19130 >>

    >>



    The ZIP Code is the wrong format for early ship sets. Somewhere is a thread with a picture of a box Marty bought with the old postal code on the return address. Maybe he meant he bought them in October of 1964?


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Options
    Regardless of when they were ordered, the big question would be "when were they shipped??"
  • Options
    CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
    The date they were shipped does not have much to do with when they were ordered. I recall ordering the 1968 set in October 1967 and did not receive the coins until late summer. Once might expect a similiar sitiuation prevailed in 1964.

    CG
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    CalGold is correct. There was no such thing as FIFO back then.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options


    << <i>The date they were shipped does not have much to do with when they were ordered. I recall ordering the 1968 set in October 1967 and did not receive the coins until late summer. Once might expect a similiar sitiuation prevailed in 1964.

    CG >>




    That is the point.....even if they were ordered in 1963 (with the expectation of Franklin Halves).... They would have been shipped in mid to late 1964 with Kennedy Halves instead.....

    The mint CERTAINLY DID NOT advertise1964 proof sets with Kennedy Half Dollars in October 1963.........
  • Options


    << <i>CalGold is correct. There was no such thing as FIFO back then.

    Russ, NCNE >>





    I was not referring to FIFO.....The point I was trying to make was that even if they were ordered in 1963 with the expectation of Franklin Halves.... They would have been shipped in mid to late 1964 with Kennedy Halves instead..... regardless of WHEN they were ordered.....

    The mint CERTAINLY DID NOT advertise1964 proof sets with Kennedy Half Dollars in October 1963.........

  • Options
    RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,653 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>No Franklin halves were produced dated 1964. >>



    Are you sure?

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Russ brings up an interesting point. Breen in his Encyclopedia states that a NYC dealer told him about being offered (and seeing) a 1964 Franklin half. The coin apparently hasn't been seen since. Has anyone seen a 1964 Franklin half?

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,721 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Awesome..... simply ask and Russ will supply.... imageimage Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    The 64 Franklins are fairly common. I'm looking for the 65. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    Looks like a circulation strike issue... we were looking for 1964 PROOF Franklins.....
  • Options
    GoldenEyeNumismaticsGoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭
    ordered early?
  • Options
    The answer is in the feedback. image
  • Options
    MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The answer is in the feedback. image >>



    So, Bush 41 was in on the dirty deed, eh?
  • Options


    << <i>Assuming these are genuine envelopes, I believe the early batches of proof sets had the old zone designation, "Philadelphia 30, PA" which was changed to :"Philadelphia, PA 19130" later in 1964. >>


    Five digit zip codes were implimented beginning in July of 1963. I would think the government would have been one of the first to begin using them, especially on envelopes that weren't sent out until close to a year later.
  • Options
    sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500 ✭
    the people that bought the last 3 sales with identical picture/description were pleased
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i><< Assuming these are genuine envelopes, I believe the early batches of proof sets had the old zone designation, "Philadelphia 30, PA" which was changed to :"Philadelphia, PA 19130" later in 1964. >>

    Five digit zip codes were implimented beginning in July of 1963. I would think the government would have been one of the first to begin using them, especially on envelopes that weren't sent out until close to a year later. >>



    Joe is correct. The earliest 1964 proof set envelopes did not have the zip code.

    Russ, NCNE

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file