Options
Grade this 1936 Cincinnati 50c Commem... (large images) GRADE REVEALED IN 1st Post with questions.

PCGS Price guide values:
MS66 - $1,650
MS65 - $725
MS64 - $460
Ok, so based on the responses, the coin is quite likely NOT an MS66, and subsequently NOT likely to be valued anywhere near $1,650 as noted in the PCGS price guide. So the questions are...
Do I send the coin back and hope that they agree?
If you owned this coin, in this grade, would you send it back?
If I do send it back, under what level do I submit this coin for a downgrade?
And assuming it's downgraded to MS65 or lower, what "value" do they use when determining compensation?
Any help is appreciated.



MS66 - $1,650
MS65 - $725
MS64 - $460
Ok, so based on the responses, the coin is quite likely NOT an MS66, and subsequently NOT likely to be valued anywhere near $1,650 as noted in the PCGS price guide. So the questions are...
Do I send the coin back and hope that they agree?
If you owned this coin, in this grade, would you send it back?
If I do send it back, under what level do I submit this coin for a downgrade?
And assuming it's downgraded to MS65 or lower, what "value" do they use when determining compensation?
Any help is appreciated.
0
Comments
-Paul
Chris
My small collection
Want List:
'61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
Cardinal T206 cards
Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
<< <i>I'm not very good at grading yet and I don't know commems at all but I would guess 62 to 63. Is that a clash to the left of the portrait or is that part of the design?
Chris >>
Part of the design.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
Commems and Early Type
All The Way - And Then Some
I collect Modern Commemoratives
and anything Franklin.
Drunner
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
<< <i>58.
-Paul >>
<< <i>First thing I would do is go to Heritage Auctions Archives and blow up the images of the PCGS MS-66 Cincinnatis they have sold. See how they compare to your coin. Then take whatever action is necessary, if any. >>
I did that long before posting this thread, thank you. Based on my comparative assessment, in my opinion, this coin is overgraded by at least a point. The difference in value is over 100% between MS65 and MS66.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
<< <i>Sell it as is.... Cheers, RickO >>
I see, based on your assessment that this coin is AU58/MS60, you therefore suggest that I sell this overgraded POS in MS66 plastic and subsequently screw the next guy. All the while hoping he doesn't decide to return it and want a refund. Not quite the business plan I'm looking for, but thanks just the same.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
<< <i>VamGuy I would call PCGS and tell them your problem. Ask if they will make some kind of compassion if you send in your coin and they downgrade it to MS-65 or lower. >>
I can call them tomorrow. I've never submitted a coin for downgrade review, but I know that there are some folks here who have experience in doing so. I'm trying to get advice from experience, rather than advice from a customer service rep who may or may not know what a request for downgrade means.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
JJ
-Paul
It is difficult to find an attractive Cincinnatis, and I think there are many coins out there where the numerical grade would surprise you. When the Cincinnati is original, the toning tends to be on the unattractive side; otherwise, the coins often have a monotonous dipped look. It is fairly common to find such coins in MS65 holders from both of the major firms.
With respect to this coin, it does have some positive aspects -- the obverse has quite nice character and luster for the issue, and the (not especially attractive but not ugly) mottled toning on the reverse helps to affirm the coin's originality.
As others have pointed out, large format photos can be extremely unflattering; the gut feeling I get glancing at the smaller photo is "gem", and sometimes this first impression is more important that the micro analysis.
Bottom line -- I suspect this coin is strong enough to argue low end 66, and that PCGS won't downgrade.
$ 834, 1438, 1380, 1392, 978
The substantial variance in price is at least suggestive of substantial qualitative differences in coins that are labelled MS66.
(As an aside, this is not an NGC versus PCGS difference -- all except the $ !392 are PCGS coins)