Photo with a $99 Nikon
PrivateCoinCollector
Posts: 2,415 ✭
What do you guys think? This is as big as I can get it on the message board using the image icon.
It is hugh using this link.
Link to Putfile
It is hugh using this link.
Link to Putfile
0
Comments
---------------------------------
"No Good Deed Goes Unpunished!"
"If it don't make $"
"It don't make cents""
The image looks OK for 50K. Certainly gets the idea across.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
What was your light source? Did you use a tripod? Do you have a macro?
Bruce
Edited to add: Nice photo for a $99 camera!
.
"Always Do Right, This Will Gratify Some And Astonish The Others" - Mark Twain
- Jim
<< <i>On my computer it is hugh. >>
That's odd, on my computer it looks like Abe, not Hugh
Seriously, nice pic. -Preussen
<< <i>Heres your same image using Photobucket
Edited to add: Nice photo for a $99 camera!
>>
So it is a limitation of Putfile.com. I was wondering about that. I will try Photobucket. Thanks. Great tip.
<< <i>Nice picture.
What was your light source? Did you use a tripod? Do you have a macro?
Bruce >>
I am using a new light box I built armed with 4 5000K Daylight bulbs (These Bulbs).
No Tripod. I find that with Digital Cameras the exposure is actually so quick that a Tripod does not seem to make enough difference to warrant its use.
The Macro is the standard setting on the Camera. It has a focal length of just a few inches. This is in Macro mode with the flash off.
So the question is: Why spend $1000 for an SLR if you can do this with a $99 Camera?