<< <i>Its not bad. I have sold old phones that I didnt need or want, or switched companys.
I plan on buying my new one on EBay. Can get a good deal. >>
I agree. I've only ever bought two phones from a provider, and one was free. All other phone I've had were ebay purchases and the phones I replace got sold on the bay. You can definately find good deals and its nice being able to upgrade at any time instead of waiting to be eligible for upgrade.
My Mom told me about this case. Glad I got a chance to see it, thanks for posting.
Got what she deserved except for a prison sentence.. $5k --Hmm maybe it should have been even more. Great video. How can anyone be so stupid as to try to even defend this action?--did the seller actually think she would win this?
Hopefully we will hear about her and her hubby getting 5-10 for fraud in the near future. They probably did have a statement in the listing that it was for a picture only. But they bury it in the small print 3 or 4 screens into their mini novel of a description and hide it by putting it in the middle of a paragraph that has nothing to do with anything. Like " Cell phone comes in many colors and there are lots of accessories available auction for photo only and is bluetooth capable". I have seen autions for proof sets that look like they are legit but buried in the small print it says "no coins included" but everything else in the listing is ment to lead you to think it is for the set with coins.
people who list items like this are scammers, plain and simple. You're obviously listing items like this with the intention of defrauding people.. to say it's their fault that they don't read it carefully enough doesn't really hold up in my book... why would you go out of your way to sell pictures of a cell phone in the first place?
WOW! I thought they were sueing for the $470 or so they ot scammed out of. Judy gives 'em $5000 !!!!! Too bad all Ebay scammers arent BUSTED like that.......
Best thing to do with old cell phones is donate them. There are organizations that accept them for domestic violence victims, etc. And you get a tax deduction. If you can't find one locally, do a Google search on cell phone donations.
I've heard the way this judgement thing works on Judge Judy, is that the program pays the the settlement amount rather than the losing party. This gets people to want to do their dirty laundry in public.
OK, lets all relax for a minute. What I really want to see is the scammer get punished. Judge Judy doesn't have any real authority to do anything does she? The scammer certainly acted like she knew that Judge Judy couldn't do anything. She smirked during the whole episode and she didn't seem repentant afterwards.
I hope that they are turned in to the IRS for their actions. Nothing will make them more miserable than having the IRS on their a$$.
The only problem - try collecting any judgement from these scum. It won't happen, because they have no assets, and probably never will. The worst part - they are "responsible" for 3 kids.
Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally
<< <i>OK, lets all relax for a minute. What I really want to see is the scammer get punished. Judge Judy doesn't have any real authority to do anything does she? The scammer certainly acted like she knew that Judge Judy couldn't do anything. She smirked during the whole episode and she didn't seem repentant afterwards. I hope that they are turned in to the IRS for their actions. Nothing will make them more miserable than having the IRS on their a$$. >>
You're right. JJ has no authority and by appearing on the show your compensation is that the network will pay all the fines. So the scamees got $5k but the scammer didn't have to pay a penny. But JJ did her best to punish her with words, embarassment, hints of IRS involvement, etc. My guess is they did a little background checking and JJ had a rough script for what she was going to say.
Im sure JJ can turn things over to a local IRS investigator. There in every town, city, ect. It wouldnt take much to push ones buttons into investigating them. It happened here at my business a couple years back. One of the employees tried to get the owner into trouble with the IRS. A local rep came, and made things miserable. The books wernt in great shape... but straight enough to prove we were operating within the law, and reporting everything (however sometimes delayed) but we still were left alone in the end.
It's amazing that some people are so desperate for their 15 minutes that even a slimeball like that would agree to appear and be so thoroughly humiliated.
Defendant was a scammer pure and simple,but probably operating legally. Judy was incensed and decided the case based on emotions and not the law. She also used her position to publicly insult and slander the defendant on unrelated matters with no legal justification.
So the defendant is a scammer but acted legally, Judy had a childish tantrum and acted unprofessionally, and the plantiff needs to learn to be more careful.
<< <i>isn't there also some dept. of the judge judy show ....that goes after people that has a judgement against them to recoup their loss? >>
Im sure there is. I cant see them just eating it like that. It doesnt prove a point to the scammer. >>
I hope there is, but somehow I doubt there is. No matter how you slice it, JJ is a TV show. And TV shows make their bread and butter on ratings. So, getting cases like this that are interesting to watch and possibly getting new viewers along with die hard JJ fans brings in their money and the paltry 5k they're shelling out is probably pocket change in comparison to what they bring in. It does suck that the only punishment to the losing party is humiliation and a genuine JJ tounge lashing. I sure hope the scammer at least catches hell from the IRS and child protective services for this.
<< <i>Defendant was a scammer pure and simple,but probably operating legally. Judy was incensed and decided the case based on emotions and not the law. She also used her position to publicly insult and slander the defendant on unrelated matters with no legal justification.
So the defendant is a scammer but acted legally, Judy had a childish tantrum and acted unprofessionally, and the plantiff needs to learn to be more careful. >>
When coins are lost in the mail, the post office wants you to provide proof that the coins had value. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what she sold did not have a substantial value of $470! There are dealers who offer certified coin packages claiming to be worth thousands according to certain published price guides. Is this legal? I believe this gal and husband will be facing prison time and lost of children if the crime they commited reaches felon status.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
I don't see how this gal could think that she could make people think they were paying that much for a picture of a phone and get away with it. She may give someone ideas about buying the photo of a coin. I wonder if she is still selling on eBay?
The money's paid by the show, so the scammer doesn't have to cough up the $5K. BUT -- I loved it when Judy was talking about bring CPS and the IRS into it -- and I bet she will. That scammer doesn't even know the can o' whoop ass that's been opened on her.
<< <i>BTW, the mother and daughter - yum, yum. >>
Oh yeah.... Nice of the daughter to bring da b00bies.
<< <i>I loved it when Judy was talking about bring CPS and the IRS into it >>
I could see bringing the IRS into it but CPS? That's just what CPS needs, an unjustified complaint on the grounds that the parents are running an unethical eBay business, or that they DIDN'T leave the kids home alone to appear on a TV show, or because mom doesn't put them in daycare so she can take a job outside the home.
It is outragous that she would go on national tv and humiliate herself. Apparently, she was still looking for an easy way out of her problems, both financial and psychological, and has no pride. Judge Judy has seen hundreds, if not thousands of people, like her in her career and had her number. Amazing how some people think judges are stupid.
It's interesting how this gal believes that since they didn't read the entire auction that they received what they paid for. Which, of course, was nonsense on her behalf! But whenever I see an auction that has a ton terms to read...and 999 out of a 1000 the picture provided is of a slab and not the coin.....well forget it, I don't have the time. It's likely you're just asking for trouble wasting your time with those type of auctions.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
i always thought that it what is important is the spirit of the contract. it was obvious that the buyer thought she was getting actual phones, not pics of phones. that is the spirit of the contract, $470 for 2 phones. now whether or not the seller said pics of phones shouldnt matter. just a thought.
It was good, but I really find it interesting that the scammers attitude was that it was the buyers fault. Speaks hoghly of whats wrong in America today. The kids in that familiy will be exactly like the parents.
Reminded me of that Michael Richards (Kramer from Seinfeld) movie "Trial and Error" where he was an actor pretending to be a lawyer trying to get off this con artist who was selling engravings of Abraham Lincoln for something like $30 a piece.
<< <i>i always thought that it what is important is the spirit of the contract. it was obvious that the buyer thought she was getting actual phones, not pics of phones. that is the spirit of the contract, $470 for 2 phones. now whether or not the seller said pics of phones shouldnt matter. just a thought. >>
I think you're right--- it has to do with the intention of the buyer, reasonable expectations, ect. No reasonable person could expect to sell two pictures of a camera for $470, so the contract was made in bad faith.
"I'll split the atom! I am the fifth dimension! I am the eighth wonder of the world!" -Gef the talking mongoose.
Comments
-Paul
That was great. This loser makes most coin scammers on ebay look relatively not so bad...
However, who would buy 2 cell phones for $460???????????????
Sounds like a pretty fishy scam on all!!!!
I plan on buying my new one on EBay. Can get a good deal.
<< <i>Its not bad. I have sold old phones that I didnt need or want, or switched companys.
I plan on buying my new one on EBay. Can get a good deal. >>
I agree. I've only ever bought two phones from a provider, and one was free. All other phone I've had were ebay purchases and the phones I replace got sold on the bay. You can definately find good deals and its nice being able to upgrade at any time instead of waiting to be eligible for upgrade.
My Mom told me about this case. Glad I got a chance to see it, thanks for posting.
Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies.
Great video. How can anyone be so stupid as to try to even defend this action?--did the seller actually think she would win this?
1969s WCLR-001 counterclash
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>How will they collect the $5000.00?? >>
The award for each judgement is paid by the producers of the show.
This gets people to want to do their dirty laundry in public.
Ray
-David
I hope that they are turned in to the IRS for their actions. Nothing will make them more miserable than having the IRS on their a$$.
The name is LEE!
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
I knew it would happen.
<< <i>OK, lets all relax for a minute. What I really want to see is the scammer get punished. Judge Judy doesn't have any real authority to do anything does she? The scammer certainly acted like she knew that Judge Judy couldn't do anything. She smirked during the whole episode and she didn't seem repentant afterwards. I hope that they are turned in to the IRS for their actions. Nothing will make them more miserable than having the IRS on their a$$. >>
You're right. JJ has no authority and by appearing on the show your compensation is that the network will pay all the fines. So the scamees got $5k but the scammer didn't have to pay a penny. But JJ did her best to punish her with words, embarassment, hints of IRS involvement, etc. My guess is they did a little background checking and JJ had a rough script for what she was going to say.
--Jerry
<< <i>isn't there also some dept. of the judge judy show ....that goes after people that has a judgement against them to recoup their loss? >>
Im sure there is. I cant see them just eating it like that. It doesnt prove a point to the scammer.
But loved this clip of Judge Judy.
Thanks for sharing.
-------------
etexmike
BTW, the mother and daughter - yum, yum.
Russ, NCNE
So the defendant is a scammer but acted legally, Judy had a childish tantrum and acted unprofessionally, and the plantiff needs to learn to be more careful.
<< <i>
<< <i>isn't there also some dept. of the judge judy show ....that goes after people that has a judgement against them to recoup their loss? >>
Im sure there is. I cant see them just eating it like that. It doesnt prove a point to the scammer. >>
I hope there is, but somehow I doubt there is. No matter how you slice it, JJ is a TV show. And TV shows make their bread and butter on ratings. So, getting cases like this that are interesting to watch and possibly getting new viewers along with die hard JJ fans brings in their money and the paltry 5k they're shelling out is probably pocket change in comparison to what they bring in. It does suck that the only punishment to the losing party is humiliation and a genuine JJ tounge lashing. I sure hope the scammer at least catches hell from the IRS and child protective services for this.
Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies.
<< <i>Defendant was a scammer pure and simple,but probably operating legally. Judy was incensed and decided the case based on emotions and not the law. She also used her position to publicly insult and slander the defendant on unrelated matters with no legal justification.
So the defendant is a scammer but acted legally, Judy had a childish tantrum and acted unprofessionally, and the plantiff needs to learn to be more careful. >>
When coins are lost in the mail, the post office wants you to provide proof that the coins had value.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what she sold did not have a substantial value of $470!
There are dealers who offer certified coin packages claiming to be worth thousands according to certain published price guides. Is this legal? I believe this gal and husband will be facing prison time and lost of children if the crime they commited reaches felon status.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
Lafayette Grading Set
<< <i>I wonder if she is still selling on eBay? >>
According to the video, she got NARU'd.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>BTW, the mother and daughter - yum, yum.
Oh yeah.... Nice of the daughter to bring da b00bies.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
<< <i>I loved it when Judy was talking about bring CPS and the IRS into it >>
I could see bringing the IRS into it but CPS? That's just what CPS needs, an unjustified complaint on the grounds that the parents are running an unethical eBay business, or that they DIDN'T leave the kids home alone to appear on a TV show, or because mom doesn't put them in daycare so she can take a job outside the home.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
Dennis
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
Good for the buyers for pressing the issue!
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Reminded me of that Michael Richards (Kramer from Seinfeld)
movie "Trial and Error" where he was an actor pretending to be
a lawyer trying to get off this con artist who was selling engravings
of Abraham Lincoln for something like $30 a piece.
Of course the engravings were actually pennies.
I thought this was a COINcidence.
My first post...updated with pics
I collect mostly moderns and I'm currently working on a US type set.
<< <i>i always thought that it what is important is the spirit of the contract. it was obvious that the buyer thought she was getting actual phones, not pics of phones. that is the spirit of the contract, $470 for 2 phones. now whether or not the seller said pics of phones shouldnt matter. just a thought. >>
I think you're right--- it has to do with the intention of the buyer, reasonable expectations, ect. No reasonable person could expect to sell two pictures of a camera for $470, so the contract was made in bad faith.