AT or NT Morgan dollar?

basestealer · February 23, 2007 6:50AM

Any opinions?

guitarwes · February 23, 2007 6:51AM

Does not look natural to me, the surface has been altered in some form or fashion. IMO

theboz11 · February 23, 2007 6:56AM

Heavily toned and dipped.

basestealer · February 23, 2007 6:57AM

dipped before or after it was toned, lol

Artificial toning over dipping?

DickyBetz · February 23, 2007 6:57AM

UGLY

basestealer · February 23, 2007 6:58AM

<< <i>UGLY >>

You should see it in person. It's really, really ugly.

bestclser1 · February 23, 2007 8:35AM

Fugly,so it doesnt matter.

commoncents05 · February 23, 2007 8:37AM

looks like fake toning over some cleaning to me, UGLY!!!

-Paul

blueifalcon · February 23, 2007 9:00AM

Are you sure you want my opinion? I didn't think so

ricko · February 23, 2007 9:30AM

Go ahead and send it to me.. I will get the ugly thing out of circulation ... Oh the sacrifice.... Cheers, RickO

etexmike · February 23, 2007 9:45AM

Kinda hard to look at the coin long enough to make a decision. I will go along with the others that it is just plain ugly. AT or NT doesn't really matter with this one.

-------------

etexmike

Myqqy · February 23, 2007 10:45AM

It looks like it's been altered somehow, and is now just bullion...

PokerGenius · February 23, 2007 10:47AM

not anything i'd be interested in...looks AT to me.

AT or NT Morgan dollar?

Comments

Leave a Comment