1914 Buffalo Newp.

Comments

• Options

  gyocomgd Posts: 2,582 ✭✭✭

  January 28, 2007 12:02PM

  That is a GREAT lookin' piece! Looks 65 to me, that's a terrific strike with outstanding detail from horn to hoof!

  

  0
• Options

  ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 28, 2007 12:07PM

  Fantastic.. definite 65+, maybe +... but very nice... Cheers, RickO

  0
• Options

  buffnut Posts: 935 ✭✭

  January 29, 2007 12:32AM

  65 - looks like there isn't a mark on the thing!

  The WTP Collection

  0
• Options

  Tonedbuff Posts: 1,190

  January 29, 2007 12:52AM

  Very nice 65 with what looks like a little rim ding at 5 oclock on the obverse likely keeping it from grading up (at least, its the only thing I can see!). What a great looking coin!

  0
• Options

  Newcomp103 Posts: 2,223 ✭

  January 29, 2007 3:08AM

  MS 64...it may just be me...but I think the rim issue, along with a few small marks on the obverse cheek area might keep it from Gem 65....but as I have always stated before...sometimes I am way off! Nice coin either way.
  

  0
• Options

  intocoins Posts: 602 ✭

  January 29, 2007 6:40AM

  thanks for the nice comments. I thought it was a nice coin for the grade. Maybe a lack of luster is what down graded this Buff, but I really like it. Heres the grade.............
  
  

  0
• Options

  JJM Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 29, 2007 7:41AM

  nice pickup

  👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan

  0