Options
A couple of examples of the direction in which the market for early date Kennedys has gone.
You modern bashers who think it's stupid to pay strong money for modern coins might want to ignore this.
1968-D PCGS MS66 Kennedy - $99.
A couple years ago those were bringing $35 to $40.
1969-D PCGS MS66 Kennedy - $625.
A couple years ago that was a $200 to $250 coin. In fact, when I sold one for $316 I was in hog heaven.
We've seen the same kind of value appreciation in most of the other early dates. The 1964 in PR69DCAM has doubled, any Accented Hair in DCAM has more than doubled, and the SMS coins in high grade DCAM are at moon money.
Russ, NCNE
1968-D PCGS MS66 Kennedy - $99.
A couple years ago those were bringing $35 to $40.
1969-D PCGS MS66 Kennedy - $625.
A couple years ago that was a $200 to $250 coin. In fact, when I sold one for $316 I was in hog heaven.
We've seen the same kind of value appreciation in most of the other early dates. The 1964 in PR69DCAM has doubled, any Accented Hair in DCAM has more than doubled, and the SMS coins in high grade DCAM are at moon money.
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
Unfortunately, I buy coins to lose money, so this analysis won't help me very much.
And just a side note there is a new leader in the Kennedy registery in the The Ogden Collection
And with a little checking people will find that allmost all of the pre 1976 Kennedys in the higher grades have doubled in the last few years.
I think I remember long ago when Legend was selling on eBay (before starting their own auction site)
they had some classic Kennedy's in ICG slabs
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Russ, NCNE
Link
Russ, NCNE
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Look at the bottom of the neck and all the chunks taken out of it. Comments?
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
<< <i>I can say I am baffled as to how this 1969D grades MS66. Scratches, nicks, don't count I guess. >>
Same way that the '68-D did. Check out the gash in his head!
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
<< <i>1969-D PCGS MS66 Kennedy - $625. >>
Russ...what's the POP on that coin and the over? (my pop reports at least a year old)
Are you in anyway responsible for this market trend?
<< <i><< 1969-D PCGS MS66 Kennedy - $625. >>
Russ...what's the POP on that coin and the over? (my pop reports at least a year old) >>
Pop is 76, with three in MS67. It's the lowest pop of the 68 to 70 coins.
<< <i>Are you in anyway responsible for this market trend? >>
Nope. It's Don's fault.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Yes I know what the scratches are. Thanks for the replies. But doesn't this type of impefection, plus the others so obvious, knock it down more than 4 grades (from MS70)? >>
Die polish lines normally do not impact grade. In particular they don't with coins of this era because they are very common.
A big part of the grade for these at PCGS is luster. They love the booming variety, and if a coin has it they will be a bit more forgiving of bagmarking.
Russ, NCNE
Actually, I've always hoped to cure the shortage.
Ragtag, even though it doesn't affect the TPG grade, it does impact some buyers, and I'd prefer a coin from a fresher die pair. JMO
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Russ, NCNE
Who certified me?
Why so high?
<< <i>Is this proof set an accented hairline? I was outbid... it went really high.
Why so high? >>
Yes, it is. It went so high because the winning bidder will pay whatever it takes. When I see him in an auction, I don't even bother.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>He got a good deal. >>
No, he didn't.
Russ, NCNE
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
<< <i>Are original rolls of proof 64 kennedys still around? >>
There is no such thing as an original roll of proof 1964 Kennedys.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Are original rolls of proof 64 kennedys still around? I bought a roll...must be at least 20 years ago. I looked at the individual coins recently...some look cameo. >>
They are put together from unopened proof sets. Most have probably been cherrypicked, since I think that's the only reason why someone would open a bunch of proof sets to make rolls (to find varieties and sell the rest). I wanted the '64 proof set to add to my proof set collection, and by coincidence this thread popped up here mentioning the accented hair. When I looked at the set in my watch list, sure enough it was an AH variety. Not sure what it's worth but now I need a proof set with an AH kennedy to complete my collection too.
Kennedies starting in the mid'80's. This has been happening in some of the
other denominations as well. (most notably cents) Some of these are in grades
as low as MS-62.
Some dates run pretty bad across denominations even in the mint sets. The
'81-P is one of these which tends to have unattractive surfaces and the host
of other problems which are more typical.
Very few gems have been made over the years and very few of these were
saved. Lower grade coins weren't as widely saved. It would hardly be sur-
prising to see some of these increases expand all the way to MS-60 for a few
coins. Collectors do demand attractive coins and many of the MS-60 moderns
are not attractive.
<< <i>Not sure what it's worth but now I need a proof set with an AH kennedy to complete my collection too. >>
You should be able to pick up an Accented Hair set for $20 to $25 assuming, of course, that it doesn't have a cameo example in it.
Here's one with an opening bid of $7.99.
Verify the image, though, and ask for a reverse image. These are plagued by milk spotting.
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE