1990 Donruss Aqueous Test... anyone ever heard of these???
onefasttalon
Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭
I'm working on my master set of Sabo, and have this card on my checklist.... what the heck is it? Anyone know? I checked Ebay... there's a single card (yep, just one) of some unknown guy out there. The card looks like the regular Donruss, but does mention something about writting on the backside. Are these real cards? What was the purpose of them? Are they listed in any (price) guides? ... Do they carry any value whatsoever?
Oh ya... and Does anyone out there have any way of getting a Sabo for me?!?!?!
Anyone's info/help will be much appreciated!
Oh ya... and Does anyone out there have any way of getting a Sabo for me?!?!?!
Anyone's info/help will be much appreciated!
ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!
0
Comments
ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!
Geordie
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
I'll try to explain based on my recollection from being in the industry from 1984-1998.
In the 90s we were trying to cut down on using some of the really harmful chemicals involved in the printing process. Using solvents with high toluene content and the like in areas that were not well ventilated can cause problems in both the near and long term. It's hard to use these chemicals and not inhale the fumes or get them on your skin.
The offset printing process up until then involved burning the image onto a photographic plate which was then mounted on the printing press. As the press revolved a solution of water, chemicals and salts, and alcohol was applied to the plate along with the ink. The water solution kept the non-image or blank areas of the plate from attracting ink. The ink stuck to the image areas.
In the early 90s some companies tested plates that needed only water to keep the non-image areas clean. This cut down on the exposure to chemicals, and cut costs. Some of these plates worked, some did not. I did not have any customers who switched permanently to the new process and I don't know if this is now an accepted concept.
So, I believe that is how the "aqueous test" was born.
Keith
You are very close in your description, but I believe you are describing the process of 'waterless' inks that was popular about 10-15 years ago... I don't think anyone is utilizing it anymore.
Aqueous tests were trying new coatings that were less caustic for the environment than UV (ultra-violet) coating that uses very toxic solutions to apply a 'dripping wet' gloss to modern cards. Aqueous coatings are water-based so as to be less harmful to the environment, while at the same time apply a coating nearky as glossy as UV, though not as 'dripping wet'. Today, aqueous coatings are the preferred method of applying gloss to ink on coated sheets.
>
Successful transactions on the BST boards with rtimmer, coincoins, gerard, tincup, tjm965, MMR, mission16, dirtygoldman, AUandAG, deadmunny, thedutymon, leadoff4, Kid4HOF03, BRI2327, colebear, mcholke, rpcolettrane, rockdjrw, publius, quik, kalinefan, Allen, JackWESQ, CON40, Griffeyfan2430, blue227, Tiggs2012, ndleo, CDsNuts, ve3rules, doh, MurphDawg, tennessebanker, and gene1978.
Here's my faovrite
I am looking for both of Puckett Aqueos Test cards! I don't think PSA will grade?
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
<< <i>I got the Billy Ripken from Chandy...Thank God that Rip Jr isn't included in set! >>
Guess again....
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
>
Successful transactions on the BST boards with rtimmer, coincoins, gerard, tincup, tjm965, MMR, mission16, dirtygoldman, AUandAG, deadmunny, thedutymon, leadoff4, Kid4HOF03, BRI2327, colebear, mcholke, rpcolettrane, rockdjrw, publius, quik, kalinefan, Allen, JackWESQ, CON40, Griffeyfan2430, blue227, Tiggs2012, ndleo, CDsNuts, ve3rules, doh, MurphDawg, tennessebanker, and gene1978.
Bob, can you post pictures of the Puckett cards. I need something to drool over.
Thanks,
Jason
<< <i>Keith;
You are very close in your description, but I believe you are describing the process of 'waterless' inks that was popular about 10-15 years ago... I don't think anyone is utilizing it anymore.
Aqueous tests were trying new coatings that were less caustic for the environment than UV (ultra-violet) coating that uses very toxic solutions to apply a 'dripping wet' gloss to modern cards. Aqueous coatings are water-based so as to be less harmful to the environment, while at the same time apply a coating nearky as glossy as UV, though not as 'dripping wet'. Today, aqueous coatings are the preferred method of applying gloss to ink on coated sheets. >>
How about aqueous plates that were developed with water only?
Guees I don't recall as much as I did a few years ago.
Thanks.
<< <i>
Bob, can you post pictures of the Puckett cards. I need something to drool over.
>>
No can do--I don't have either #269 or MVP #8. Your drool will have to stay in your mouth (ew).
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
<< <i>Guess again.... >>
What does that Ripken bring?
<< <i>In the other thread someone asked about the "aqueous" designation. It was mentioned that this had to do with testing new printing technology.
I'll try to explain based on my recollection from being in the industry from 1984-1998.
In the 90s we were trying to cut down on using some of the really harmful chemicals involved in the printing process. Using solvents with high toluene content and the like in areas that were not well ventilated can cause problems in both the near and long term. It's hard to use these chemicals and not inhale the fumes or get them on your skin.
So, I believe that is how the "aqueous test" was born.
Keith >>
Uh oh! I remember as a young teen we used to practically get high from the smell of the freshly opened cards. I think we used to buy tons of 1990 Donruss and 1989 Upper Deck just for the buzz!!! The "garbage bag" packaging that Score used really retained the smells in until they were opened. Maybe I have an idea for a class action suit for brain damage!!!
Can anyone give me a fair price range for a Will Clark aqueous card? If not, what about the price range for similar players (maybe Yount, Sandberg, Grace, Molitor and the like)?
FYI, if my deal ends up working out, I'll ask the seller if he has other singles, as it seems that several board members might be interested. Heck, maybe we should make a list (and try to get a bulk discount).
If you're interested in aqueous singles, post here and I'll see if the seller can help us all out.
(I'm claiming the Will Clark, of course!)
ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!
<< <i>
<< <i>In the other thread someone asked about the "aqueous" designation. It was mentioned that this had to do with testing new printing technology.
I'll try to explain based on my recollection from being in the industry from 1984-1998.
In the 90s we were trying to cut down on using some of the really harmful chemicals involved in the printing process. Using solvents with high toluene content and the like in areas that were not well ventilated can cause problems in both the near and long term. It's hard to use these chemicals and not inhale the fumes or get them on your skin.
So, I believe that is how the "aqueous test" was born.
Keith >>
Uh oh! I remember as a young teen we used to practically get high from the smell of the freshly opened cards. I think we used to buy tons of 1990 Donruss and 1989 Upper Deck just for the buzz!!! The "garbage bag" packaging that Score used really retained the smells in until they were opened. Maybe I have an idea for a class action suit for brain damage!!! >>
I was thinking the same thing!
Those UV coated cards from 1992 wreaked but gave ya a buzz!!!!
Anyone else remember the buzz from Stadium Club and Fleer Ultra?
mike
I never really thought I'd see this card, much less own it.
<< <i>I'm going to show this off in a couple of threads, as it's easily the most significant addition I've ever made to my collection.
I never really thought I'd see this card, much less own it.
>>
Wow so you picked up this card 3 years later?
What did it go for if you dont mind me asking
very cool pick up
<< <i>
Wow so you picked up this card 3 years later?
What did it go for if you dont mind me asking
very cool pick up >>
Yup. Patience pays off. The seller that approached me three years ago had counterfeit cards, so I waited until this one appeared on eBay. I ended up paying about $350 for it. More than I wanted to pay, but less than I was willing to. It's a lot of money for a baseball card that isn't actually all that popular (how many people really want this card? A dozen? Two at the most?), but I figured I'd never have the opportunity again.
Speaking of rare, should be a Witt UD error on ebay soon.
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
<< <i>very cool! will PSA grade it? >>
Nope. They have graded a few, but apparently by mistake. I'm going to send it to SGC, primarily for authentication, next week.
1996 Select Certified Mirror Gold Ozzie Smith
2006 Bowman Chrome Orange Refractor Chris Carpenter