Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Are most of the best early half cents and large cents represented in the PCGS or NGC census?

I've read that many early copper collectors prefer their coins raw. Does this mean that compared to other (noncopper) areas the PCGS and other main TPG censuses (censi?) are not an accurate indication of what is out there?

And yes, this is my first post. I've been religiously lurking and learning for a few months.

Who is John Galt?

Comments

  • Options
    mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    welcome.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,353 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've read that many early copper collectors prefer their coins raw. Does this mean that compared to other (noncopper) areas the PCGS and other main TPG censuses (censi?) are not an accurate indication of what is out there? >>

    YES

    Welcome aboard! image




  • Options
    MisterBungleMisterBungle Posts: 2,308 ✭✭✭

    Yes.

    A lot of early copper does trade raw, for that, and
    other reasons.

    Welcome aboard!!

    ~


    "America suffers today from too much pluribus and not enough unum.".....Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Not even close. As your reading suggests, the vast majority of early copper is unslabbed. The PCGS and NGC census are practically useless for these coins. I'd guess less than 10% are slabbed and would suggest this is due to both the copper market which often prefers raw coins as well as the large percentage of problem coins (corrosion, recoloring, etc.) that would preclude them from ever making it into plastic...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    p.s. image
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    For example, if you look at chain cents, PCGS shows 47 coins graded at AU50 or higher and NGC shows 22. Do you think this significantly underestimates the number of this type of coin?

    Who is John Galt?
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm going to disagree with the crowd and say that I think most of the high grade condition census copper has at one time been graded and resides on the pop reports.

    Now, whether they're still in the holder is a completely different matter. image
  • Options
    LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭
    Welcome!
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • Options
    Thanks TDN. That's what I was thinking as I've seen many raw early copper coins for sale that mention that they were previously slabbed as PCGS AU55 (or whatever). Thanks for the confirmation.

    Who is John Galt?
  • Options
    rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think that the majority of high grade early large cent coins are NOT slabbed, except for the commonest varieties. The reason is that even in the best collections, a significant percentage of the early coins cannot be slabbed due to "problems." Thus, putting together a slabbed set by variety becomes next to impossible, and nobody wants a partially slabbed, partially raw set. Many of the better Sheldon varieties of the 1790's are virtually impossible to obtain in non-corroded condition. To make matters worse, PCGS and NGC are paranoid about "altered surfaces" and "questionable color" when it comes to early copper, so collectors usually get a large % of their coins bodybagged, which is not a satisfying use of their funds.

    The one area of early copper that defies this trend is "type" coins, like the 1818 and 1820 cents from the Randall hoard, and some of the common hoard coins of the 1850s. These coins are easier to sell to the type-collecting public once they are sealed in a slab that says MS65 BN.
  • Options
    RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image to the Forums, SmallEagle! Enjoy!

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Options
    michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    : Are most of the best early half cents and large cents represented in the PCGS or NGC census?


    no
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    I don't know whether or not it's "most," but I would suspect that among "slabworthy" classic coins of considerable worth, early copper is less likely to be slabbed. However, it's very likely that a fair number of them have been slabbed and cracked out by early copper aficionados who prefer them raw. I'd bet most of them are still reflected in the pop reports.
  • Options


    << <i>Not even close. As your reading suggests, the vast majority of early copper is unslabbed. The PCGS and NGC census are practically useless for these coins. I'd guess less than 10% are slabbed and would suggest this is due to both the copper market which often prefers raw coins as well as the large percentage of problem coins (corrosion, recoloring, etc.) that would preclude them from ever making it into plastic...Mike >>



    I agree--the same probably goes for DBH and CBH material as well. Most Bust Half afficianados like raw coins--I do.

    Edited to add: Welcome!!!! image
    Curmudgeon in waiting!
  • Options
    notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭
    Great first post. Welcome. You don't have to wait for anohter similarly good question for future posts. --Jerry
  • Options
    Welcome - and a good post.

    IMO most early copper is raw. Look at the major copper collections sold since the advent of TPG (excepting Rasmussen and Reiver which were slabbed for marketing and many immediately broken out by collectors acquiring the pieces) when auctioned off. If you look at the official condition census ( the top 25 coins known to the CC keepers of each Sheldon and Newcomb variety) published by Bill Noyes, Del Bland and Dan Demeo. Very little is known to be slabbed in the CC. Additionaly, if you take into account most of the everyday copper it's not worth it to slab the coins. TPG condition census is very inaccurate, especially where condition census pieces are concerned, as to the overall population of coppers, and in their grading as compared to EAC style standards. In some cases maybe it makes sense to slab copper, However, I would surmise that the majority of seriously dedicated copper collectors prefer raw coins to slabbed coins. One really cannot truly appreciate the beauty or condition of an early copper coin in a slab as opposed to raw. I crack out any copper that I might buy slabbed and do not know a single copper collector that prefers or collects slabbed coppers. Not to say there are none - just to illustrate the point

    Ultimately, to each his own in preference, however, TPG census information is not only of no value to me in early copper populations, but totally misleading in in terms of the accurate grading of early coppers. IMHO
  • Options
    It has been stated here that 1.) most early copper collectors prefer to enjoy their pieces raw and 2.) the pieces are easier to sell when they are slabbed. If this cycle persists perhaps the TPG census currently or will someday soon actually overstate the number of high-end condition census pieces.

    Who is John Galt?
  • Options
    I'm not convinced early coppers are easier to sell if slabbed. Most specialists deplored the slabbing of the Reiver and Rasmussen coins. Many of these coins were conserved by NCS. In fact EAC grades were given along with the TP grades. The Reiver and Rasmussen collections were also marketing large collections to much more diverse crowd than copper weenies or EACers alone and maybe slabbing served to satisfy a broader base of potential buyers. The consignors and auction house obviously felt that this would be financially rewarding.

    I don't feel that TPGs will get the opportunity to slab any significant number of high-end pieces. The majority will continue to trade raw.
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm not convinced early coppers are easier to sell if slabbed. Most specialists deplored the slabbing of the Reiver and Rasmussen coins. Many of these coins were conserved by NCS. In fact EAC grades were given along with the TP grades. The Reiver and Rasmussen collections were also marketing large collections to much more diverse crowd than copper weenies or EACers alone and maybe slabbing served to satisfy a broader base of potential buyers. The consignors and auction house obviously felt that this would be financially rewarding.

    I don't feel that TPGs will get the opportunity to slab any significant number of high-end pieces. The majority will continue to trade raw. >>



    I won't dispute your overall assertion, I would point out that copper type coins are far more saleable in slabs -- admittedly this is a small portion of the market, but it shouldn't be completely ignored...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Only guessing, but I'd be surprised if more than 25% of the high end early coppers are slabbed.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    Mike, good point and very valid one for the type and date material !!! Also as copper collecting goes for mainstream you will see the TPGs increase. IMO there are two definite camps here that drive this - the specialists/those that have a strong interest in copper and those that do not specialize, i.e., type and some date collectors.
  • Options
    STONESTONE Posts: 15,275 ✭
    Since your question has already been answered, I'll send a Welcome Aboard over to ya!!!
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Mike, good point and very valid one for the type and date material !!! Also as copper collecting goes for mainstream you will see the TPGs increase. IMO there are two definite camps here that drive this - the specialists/those that have a strong interest in copper and those that do not specialize, i.e., type and some date collectors. >>



    And beginners who aren't as comfortable purchasing raw. image
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    I'd be one of those beginners you mentioned...

    Who is John Galt?
  • Options


    << <i>For example, if you look at chain cents, PCGS shows 47 coins graded at AU50 or higher and NGC shows 22. Do you think this significantly underestimates the number of this type of coin? >>




    << <i>It has been stated here that 1.) most early copper collectors prefer to enjoy their pieces raw and 2.) the pieces are easier to sell when they are slabbed. If this cycle persists perhaps the TPG census currently or will someday soon actually overstate the number of high-end condition census pieces. >>


    By EAC standards they are already overstated. You mention the number of chain cents over AU-50. Graded by EAC standards, there are currently only 18 chain cents in the Condition Census AU-50 or higher. A great many of those pieces in the PCGS and NGC pop reports are probably in the census, but at much lower levels, and some of them probably don't even make the census.

    We have seen many many cases when coins sold in a major copper collection are sold that don't make the census or are at the low end of the scale then get slabbed by one of the services and then promoted as "finest known" or equal to the third finest in the CC etc. But they are comparing the liberal (by EAC standards) TPG grade to the much more conservitive EAC grades in the census. Just because they slabbed it doesn't mean that it is getting bumped up in the census.
  • Options
    AZLARRYAZLARRY Posts: 1,189 ✭✭
    image
    image
  • Options
    NicNic Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would GUESS most of the higher MS grades, non-variety, have been slabbed. Agree TDN. K
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'd be one of those beginners you mentioned... >>



    A little piece of advice -- you would do good to stick to PCGS slabs for a while. Avoid NGC and ANACS slabs until you have the ability to spot problem coins in these holders...Mike

    p.s. please consider turning on your private messages -- on the top right of this page, click the "profile" button, the turn "allow private messages" on.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    MikeinFl,

    Done.

    Who is John Galt?
  • Options
    Great question. A large majority of serious copper collectors prefer to store their copper coins "raw". Coppers are difficult coins due to the fact that copper is a reactive metal. I brush my coins on a regular schedule and store them in cotton liners inside of 2x2 envelopes. They are also coated with a protective agent to prevent toning or other negative atmospheric effects. None of my coppers are currently in slabs.

    In the modern auction era, most coppers are slabbed so that auction houses will not have a large volume of returns from non-live auction bidders. For instance, Heritage has all copper coins "slabbed" by NGC, NCS or even ANACS. Most by NGC and NCS since Heritage has a large ownership percentage of the company. This does not mean that they all received a grade. If a copper is a "problem" coin, it will be slabbed by NCS. There are a large number of coins from rare varieties that would be considered "problem" coins and could never receive a grade. This includes a great number of Condition Census level coins. The Jules Reiver auction in January 2006 was a great example.

    There are also major auction companies that sell copper in the "raw". Specifically, Stack's, Superior and Goldberg. Most of the major copper dealers sell "raw" coins almost exclusively.

    In looking at my own collection, about 60% of the coins were in a slab at one time or another. About 10% have actually been in a slab multiple times. The other 40% were bought "raw". Most of these are Condition Census level coins and there is no record that any of them were ever slabbed. Many of my most prized "old-time" coins with long pedigrees have never, ever been slabbed. They have all been acquired privately in the "copper fraternity".

    The obvious exception to the rule of coppers not staying in the slabs are the high grade and ultra-high grade type sets and registry sets. There are some really nice high grade coppers as well as a number of Condition Census level coins in sets such as these.

    In answer to the accuracy of the censuses of the grading services...they simply tell you how many of certain coins have been graded by a certain grading service at a certain level. Not accounted for are 1) crackouts, 2) crossovers, 3) resubmissions, 4) coins that have never been graded, 5) "problem" coins. In the copper world, there are definitely a high percentage of coins in #4 and #5.
    MSpur1
  • Options
    CoxeCoxe Posts: 11,139 ✭
    The best examples are not always slabbable. The standards TPGs use for rendering a positive verdict on a coin do not always work when you are looking over centuries back at copper. Additionally, as I am sure folks pointed out in this thread, early copper collectors commonly abhor slabs. This is particularly the case for issues with interenting ornamentation or lettering on the edges. I personally find early copper out of place in slabs. I like it raw and don't mind a little verdegris, corrosion, cleaning, .... as long as it is a nice example with good centering and a nice representative strike.
    Select Rarities -- DMPLs and VAMs
    NSDR - Life Member
    SSDC - Life Member
    ANA - Pay As I Go Member

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file