Options
Since when is "In God We Trust" on our coinage not a coin related subject ???




0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Discussing IGWT on coins is a legitimate numismatic topic, if the predictable arguing and flame fest about religion and politics can be avoided. Usually, unfortunately, it can't.
<< <i>This thread is doomed to poofdom. >>
Are you a poofter?
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
People on both sides of the issue discussing their opinions, giving valuable history information, ...etc...
then *poof*, all that gone ???
Chicolini: Mint? No, no, I no like a mint. Uh - what other flavor you got?
-Mark Twain
good or bad?
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>"Liberty"
good or bad? >>
Liberty = good
IGWT = good
EPU = good
Lady Liberty = good
Dead Presidents = bad
<< <i>Why would a IGWT thread be pulled? >>
The last two were.
I'm against IGWT on coins. It's anti-American and anti-Christian. I agree with Teddy Roosevelt about the Deity and coinage.
Since 14 October 2004.
My World Coin Type Set
<< <i>So? I'm anti-athiest and its my God given right to say so
That's OK. Atheists still love you.
<< <i>
<< <i>Why would a IGWT thread be pulled? >>
The last two were.
I'm against IGWT on coins. It's anti-American and anti-Christian. I agree with Teddy Roosevelt about the Deity and coinage. >>
How is IGWT anti-American and anti-Christian?
My small collection
Want List:
'61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
Cardinal T206 cards
Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>How is IGWT anti-American and anti-Christian? >>
Jesus said "Bring me a denarius and let me look at it." They brought the coin, and he asked them, "Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?" "Caesar's," they replied. Then Jesus said to them, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's." (Mark 12:15-17)
Jesus understood the importance of keeping Church and State separate. This separation is further supported in the US Constitution, as well as the following writings of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, who are arguably the primary architects of this grand experiment we call the United States of America.
Theodore Roosevelt explained the issue thusly: My own feeling in the matter is due to my very firm conviction that to put such a motto on coins, or to use it in any kindred manner, not only does no good but does positive harm, and is in effect irreverence, which comes dangerously close to sacrilege. I agree with TR in this regard.
Am I to assume you don't collect any coinage with this phrase on it or it is ok to collect and/or spend?
I would think if you feel that strong about it, you'd do neither.
<< <i>so, those of you that have a "problem" with IGWT being on our coinage....
Am I to assume you don't collect any coinage with this phrase on it or it is ok to collect and/or spend?
I would think if you feel that strong about it, you'd do neither. >>
Just goes to prove Goose.......Talk is cheap...
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>so, those of you that have a "problem" with IGWT being on our coinage....
Am I to assume you don't collect any coinage with this phrase on it or it is ok to collect and/or spend? >>
"When in Rome..." There's a lot about this country I don't like. But there's way more about it that I do. I ain't leaving anytime soon.
<< <i>so, those of you that have a "problem" with IGWT being on our coinage....
Am I to assume you don't collect any coinage with this phrase on it or it is ok to collect and/or spend?
I would think if you feel that strong about it, you'd do neither. >>
I assume that those who feel that IGWT belongs on our coinage purposely do not collect any coins struck before 1864.
If you feel that strongly about it, you'd shun such godless entities.
<< <i>so, those of you that have a "problem" with IGWT being on our coinage....
Am I to assume you don't collect any coinage with this phrase on it or it is ok to collect and/or spend?
I would think if you feel that strong about it, you'd do neither. >>
It's all fiat crap that our government forces us to use.
They know that we can't put our trust in the value of base metals!
<< <i>
<< <i>so, those of you that have a "problem" with IGWT being on our coinage....
Am I to assume you don't collect any coinage with this phrase on it or it is ok to collect and/or spend?
I would think if you feel that strong about it, you'd do neither. >>
I assume that those who feel that IGWT belongs on our coinage purposely do not collect any coins struck before 1864.
If you feel that strongly about it, you'd shun such godless entities. >>
Does this mean I have to throw away my rock collection too ???
Carol
Quick question... Can a request be made to make a thread go poof if it was coin related and not a flame fest in any way? In other words can someone get a post they might not look good in erased by request? And if so...do we all have that ability?
<< <i>Does this mean I have to throw away my rock collection too ??? >>
If the US Government were to compel me to use rocks with IGWT engraved in them, I would be against that as well.
<< <i>If you can keep this thread about the numismatics of the issure rather than a flame over religion it can stay. If it goes the way the other threads did then it will go poof.
Carol >>
I think it should go poof. Doesn't seem to have any relevance to numismatics IMO.
if you fail to realize that participation here has certain commonalities with politics and business as usual you're doomed to confusion. in a nutshell, if certain forum members had started the deleted threads there's a fair chance that they'd still be running.
<< <i>
<< <i>If you can keep this thread about the numismatics of the issure rather than a flame over religion it can stay. If it goes the way the other threads did then it will go poof.
Carol >>
I think it should go poof. Doesn't seem to have any relevance to numismatics IMO. >>
You're kidding, right ?
<< <i>everyone needs to understand something about on topic and off topic threads, a guiding principal, so-to-speak......................it isn't necessarily what the topic is, it's more who the OP is which dictates the deletion by our beloved moderators.
if you fail to realize that participation here has certain commonalities with politics and business as usual you're doomed to confusion. in a nutshell, if certain forum members had started the deleted threads there's a fair chance that they'd still be running. >>
Well said Al.
It is on our coinage---that being said---Does it bother you because it offends you or is more of a principle issue?
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
<< <i>Does it bother you because it offends you or is more of a principle issue? >>
Entirely on principle. Stuff offends me every day. I don't get all uppity about it -- that's part of life.
I honestly feel that IGWT is contrary to the desires of the Founders of this nation, and indeed contrary to Christian doctrine.
<< <i>
<< <i>Does it bother you because it offends you or is more of a principle issue? >>
Entirely on principle. Stuff offends me every day. I don't get all uppity about it -- that's part of life.
I honestly feel that IGWT is contrary to the desires of the Founders of this nation, and indeed contrary to Christian doctrine. >>
Wasn't this nation and it's constitution founded on principles?
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>If you can keep this thread about the numismatics of the issure rather than a flame over religion it can stay. If it goes the way the other threads did then it will go poof.
Carol >>
I think it should go poof. Doesn't seem to have any relevance to numismatics IMO. >>
You're kidding, right ?
No. I'm not. I personally don't think it belongs on our coinage but, that said, the US Congress makes the determination about mottos, and other legends on our coinage, hence a political decision. We collect the coinage minted under its authorization. If we don't like the mottos placed on our coinage we have an avenue to change it--via the political process--not here. We can rant all day but so what--why not complain about the Jefferson nickel lock enjoyed by Virginia. Don't think that will stop the Jefferson collectors from looking for full steps, etc.
<< <i>everyone needs to understand something about on topic and off topic threads, a guiding principal, so-to-speak......................it isn't necessarily what the topic is, it's more who the OP is which dictates the deletion by our beloved moderators.
if you fail to realize that participation here has certain commonalities with politics and business as usual you're doomed to confusion. in a nutshell, if certain forum members had started the deleted threads there's a fair chance that they'd still be running. >>
This is why the OF was killed as well. Think about the events leading up to it, who was crying about what, who delighted in it's closing. The trail is still warm, you can figure out who and why if you think about it. Certain members got upset, and now it's gone.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>If you can keep this thread about the numismatics of the issure rather than a flame over religion it can stay. If it goes the way the other threads did then it will go poof.
Carol >>
I think it should go poof. Doesn't seem to have any relevance to numismatics IMO. >>
You're kidding, right ?
No. I'm not. I personally don't think it belongs on our coinage but, that said, the US Congress makes the determination about mottos, and other legends on our coinage, hence a political decision. We collect the coinage minted under its authorization. If we don't like the mottos placed on our coinage we have an avenue to change it--via the political process--not here. We can rant all day but so what--why not complain about the Jefferson nickel lock enjoyed by Virginia. Don't think that will stop the Jefferson collectors from looking for full steps, etc. >>
You used the word "coinage" 4 times in your reply.
That should give you a good clue!
<< <i>Hi Carol,
Quick question... Can a request be made to make a thread go poof if it was coin related and not a flame fest in any way? In other words can someone get a post they might not look good in erased by request? And if so...do we all have that ability? >>
If you post something in a thread you want to change you can do it by using the editing function.
We won't pull the whole thread for the reason you stated above.
<< <i>I did manage to read thru some of the IGWT threads and found most of the info and discussion very informative.
People on both sides of the issue discussing their opinions, giving valuable history information, ...etc...
then *poof*, all that gone ???
Informative doesn't mean on topic. It got WAY off topic and was an OF type discussion. Since there is no open forum due to how people used it, it shouldn't have been continued on here (I, for one, am glad it was poofed). Most people know about Frank's forum and Thiggy/CCW's forum. So there are other venues for religious discussion.
Also, the same topic pops up multiple times and always goes the same path. If people can't keep it focused on the coin, then it should go poof
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>
<< <i>everyone needs to understand something about on topic and off topic threads, a guiding principal, so-to-speak......................it isn't necessarily what the topic is, it's more who the OP is which dictates the deletion by our beloved moderators.
if you fail to realize that participation here has certain commonalities with politics and business as usual you're doomed to confusion. in a nutshell, if certain forum members had started the deleted threads there's a fair chance that they'd still be running. >>
This is why the OF was killed as well. Think about the events leading up to it, who was crying about what, who delighted in it's closing. The trail is still warm, you can figure out who and why if you think about it. Certain members got upset, and now it's gone. >>
No pharmer, that is the short-sighted look at it. The OF people were warned MANY times, and even had a few "timeouts" during the last year or so. People kept pushing the limit and it looks like PCGS got sick and tired of having to babysit. Don't blame those that you are intending to blame (yes, I know at least one of them you want to point to) as it was ALL the posters who kept pushing and pushing and pushing.
People who would post attack after attack. Who would stalk other posters. People who would post something late on a Friday night because Carol has a life and isn't around on the weekends and would post "bad" things.
I liked the OF when it was a place to ask questions, joke around, and have fun. When people kept taking it too far, then it went bye-bye. Blame the users of the OF, not anyone else. Btw...it had really gone downhill before it got poofed....I used to frequent it, but it got so sickening bad that I stopped going for the most part...about a month before it went bye-bye, so the closing doesn't really surprise me.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
Russ, NCNE