I'm trying three proof Kennedy halfs I found in rolls. 2 are copper nickel and the 3rd is a 405 silver from 1976. I figure I am not going to harm them anymore then what they suffered in circulation. Will be interesting to see what happens to proofs as well as the 40% silver.
I also have a couple of older coins that are cleaned. Might tone them just bit to see how they look.
I have a couple of white BU common Morgans to try for chits n giggles. I'm kinda thinkin that after all this time the surfaces might be too passive for anything serious to happen but we will see.
Would Taco Bell napkin toning be considered AT? How about if you had a coin already toning and just stuck it in the napkin to push it along? We'll see how things go.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
<< <i>Would Taco Bell napkin toning be considered AT? How about if you had a coin already toning and just stuck it in the napkin to push it along? We'll see how things go. >>
<< <i>Would Taco Bell napkin toning be considered AT? How about if you had a coin already toning and just stuck it in the napkin to push it along? We'll see how things go. >>
The complicated factor is that wrapping coins in tissue paper, Kleenex, and what have you is a long-established way many people protected coins from damage. For most of history, this wasn't done with any intent to tone the surfaces -- merely to prevent dings, fingerprints, et cetera.
So I would think if someone took, say, an AU to mint state 1905 coin and put it tissue paper to protect it for generations, and by 1970 you had something nicely toned, we'd consider it "NT."
So does this mean that some types of wrapping coins in paper to preserve them are NT, depending on what type of paper it was, how long ago it was done, and the intent of the person wrapping the coin in paper?
To me that's the reason this NT/AT debate has a large component of subjectivity to it -- just like grading itself.
Ziggy29, your comments were my thoughts exactly. There is blatant AT, then questionable AT, then likely NT, more of a continuum than a distinct yes/no, and yes, there is a lot of subjectivity. Some may argue it's based on intent, but noone could ever know the intent of the prior owner/owners of all coins, so that is out the window.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
You are doing this with intent is to tone the coin - it's AT. You can try and justify it any way you want to make yourself feel better about it, but the fact remains.
Just wondering. My understanding of one of the problems of AT is that you've accelerated the whole toning aspect, e.g. the toning is not stable and even after the coin is withdrawn from the heat and/or chemical environment the coins toning will proceed relatively quickly towards a dark or black appearance. Does anyone know how stable the toning is on coins that have been put in a TB napkin once the coins have been removed from the napkin?
<< <i>You are doing this with intent is to tone the coin - it's AT. You can try and justify it any way you want to make yourself feel better about it, but the fact remains. >>
I agree morally, but in terms of evaluating the toning, the chemistry doesn't change because of the intent -- whether it was unintentional or intentional, the same conditions and environment will produce similar colors.
Someone who *knows* the coin was intentionally toned like that might feel morally obligated to not sell coins like this, but a third party who doesn't know the intent can only go by whether or not the toning looks like it could have realistically resulted from a lengthy, unintentional progression of color based on reasonable, established storage methods and environments.
As for intent being the factor -- if someone put a coin in a Wayte Raymond holder 50 years ago and took it out toned 20 years later, it's NT because they never intended the result, but if someone did it NOW because they wanted toning, and they got the same results after 20 years, that would be AT?
This is what I mean by the idea that this entire debate has SOME level of subjectivity to it, and as another replied, it almost feels like there's a "continuum", an entire spectrum if you will, with obvious AT on one end, almost certain NT on the other end, and all points in between.
I've found for me at least that a piece of toilen paper (no, not used) seems to work better than the napkin method. Here is an 1877 S quarter that was polished white. It's now been in the toilet paper for about 4 or 5 months.
JJ
Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
<< <i>Just wondering. My understanding of one of the problems of AT is that you've accelerated the whole toning aspect, e.g. the toning is not stable and even after the coin is withdrawn from the heat and/or chemical environment the coins toning will proceed relatively quickly towards a dark or black appearance. Does anyone know how stable the toning is on coins that have been put in a TB napkin once the coins have been removed from the napkin? >>
Paper induced toning should be very stable. The unstable AT's are produced by less innocent, more chemical means.
"Wars are really ugly! They're dirty and they're cold. I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole." Mary
OK. I went to a Taco Bell today and grabbed a handful of napkins. Figured it would make for interesting experimentation with some cheap common raw coins I have around. Here are some candidates I was considering as they were all common, cheap, under 20 bucks each (most way less) when I bought them and are problem-free. Might do them all. Any suggestion on ones I should not bother with? I don't think it will be harming the future of numismatics.
1883 No Cents Liberty 5c MS63 1937-S 10c MS60 1946-S 25c MS64 1955-D 25c MS63 1956 25c PF65 1948-D 50c MS63 1958 50c PF67CAM 1995 SAE MS
<< <i>Just wondering. My understanding of one of the problems of AT is that you've accelerated the whole toning aspect, e.g. the toning is not stable and even after the coin is withdrawn from the heat and/or chemical environment the coins toning will proceed relatively quickly towards a dark or black appearance. Does anyone know how stable the toning is on coins that have been put in a TB napkin once the coins have been removed from the napkin? >>
The coin has been out for some time and not one once of change. Toning looks very stable!
I put mine in a Taco Bell napkin 2 weeks ago (2 coins, 2 seperate napkins). However, I stored them in a U.S.Mint coin bag and put them in a metal filing cabinet drawer. Let's see if it works. Thanks for the idea.
My guinea pig coins are 50-D/S Wash quarter in 64 and a 64 Kennedy half in 63. Both have excellent luster.
Tom
What is money, in reality, but dirty pieces of paper and metal upon which privilege is stamped?
<< <i>I put mine in a Taco Bell napkin 2 weeks ago (2 coins, 2 seperate napkins). However, I stored them in a U.S.Mint coin bag and put them in a metal filing cabinet drawer. Let's see if it works. Thanks for the idea.
My guinea pig coins are 50-D/S Wash quarter in 64 and a 64 Kennedy half in 63. Both have excellent luster.
Tom >>
Tom I think you have the coin with the most value in a napkin! 50 D/S is not a cheap coin. Good Luck!
Tom I think you have the coin with the most value in a napkin! 50 D/S is not a cheap coin. Good Luck!
Oh yeah! Can't wait to see the outcome. Actually, I forgot all about it until I saw this thread; otherwise, I'd be farting around with it too much and screwing up the process (timewise that is). Patience isn't a virtue with me.
Tom
What is money, in reality, but dirty pieces of paper and metal upon which privilege is stamped?
I've had 6 coins wrapped in ZAXBY's napkins for about 6 weeks.....nothing btw, Zaxby's is a chicken restuarant that started in Statesboro, Ga by two college students and now they're everywhere! The napkins from there were brown so I thought they had to have some kinda something in 'em. no such luck. I put a BU Morgan, Merc, Walker, ASE, a VF cleaned CBH and a UNC polished Buffalo nickel in them and set a bag of rolled Red wheates on them so the napkins would touch the surface of the coins.
@ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work. Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
I had some Lincolns out and set aside while I was roll searching. I also had a BU Morgan out with them. I didn't feel like stapling up the Lincoln's in 2x2s at the time so I put the cloth they were on flat into a manila folder to keep the dust off. I got busy on other things for a few weeks and when I got around to opening the folder the obverse of the Morgan which had the folder against it had started to get some color on the high points. I'm leaving it in there just to see what happens. This coin will NOT ever be for sale.
i wrapped a couple of 2006 coins in a taco bell napkin and set it on fire to accelerate the process alittle... the dime came out mostly black and spotty but the quarter came out better with just some yellowish rim toning. dont think i save either one. just through em in my change jug to be rolled and deposited to the bank some day.
Comments
<< <i>Why not just marinate the coins in TB hot sauce! >>
Pass
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
<< <i>I've put a few proof coins in some taco bell napkins...... I couldn't resist. But I don't think anything has happened yet.....
It is temping eh?
<< <i>Do Mcdonalds Napkins or Jack In The Box napkins also work? >>
Nope, not that I know of. I hear Wendy's napkins do.
I also have a couple of older coins that are cleaned. Might tone them just bit to see how they look.
Looking for Denmark 1874 20-Kroner. Please offer.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
Hell, I don't need to exercise.....I get enough just pushing my luck.
<< <i>You should realize that any discussion of AT at this point in time is in extremely poor taste. Please leave this to the professionals.
Any discussion of Taco Bell is also in extremely poor taste.
I'll take a picture tonight and post it......I think it's basically turned black now....
Will’sProoflikes
<< <i>Would Taco Bell napkin toning be considered AT? How about if you had a coin already toning and just stuck it in the napkin to push it along? We'll see how things go.
Yes and yes.
To me, at least.
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>Would Taco Bell napkin toning be considered AT? How about if you had a coin already toning and just stuck it in the napkin to push it along? We'll see how things go. >>
The complicated factor is that wrapping coins in tissue paper, Kleenex, and what have you is a long-established way many people protected coins from damage. For most of history, this wasn't done with any intent to tone the surfaces -- merely to prevent dings, fingerprints, et cetera.
So I would think if someone took, say, an AU to mint state 1905 coin and put it tissue paper to protect it for generations, and by 1970 you had something nicely toned, we'd consider it "NT."
So does this mean that some types of wrapping coins in paper to preserve them are NT, depending on what type of paper it was, how long ago it was done, and the intent of the person wrapping the coin in paper?
To me that's the reason this NT/AT debate has a large component of subjectivity to it -- just like grading itself.
Will’sProoflikes
2K
8 Reales Madness Collection
Instagram: 8 Reales Numis
U.S. Type Set
<< <i>You are doing this with intent is to tone the coin - it's AT. You can try and justify it any way you want to make yourself feel better about it, but the fact remains. >>
I agree morally, but in terms of evaluating the toning, the chemistry doesn't change because of the intent -- whether it was unintentional or intentional, the same conditions and environment will produce similar colors.
Someone who *knows* the coin was intentionally toned like that might feel morally obligated to not sell coins like this, but a third party who doesn't know the intent can only go by whether or not the toning looks like it could have realistically resulted from a lengthy, unintentional progression of color based on reasonable, established storage methods and environments.
As for intent being the factor -- if someone put a coin in a Wayte Raymond holder 50 years ago and took it out toned 20 years later, it's NT because they never intended the result, but if someone did it NOW because they wanted toning, and they got the same results after 20 years, that would be AT?
This is what I mean by the idea that this entire debate has SOME level of subjectivity to it, and as another replied, it almost feels like there's a "continuum", an entire spectrum if you will, with obvious AT on one end, almost certain NT on the other end, and all points in between.
JJ
<< <i>Just wondering. My understanding of one of the problems of AT is that you've accelerated the whole toning aspect, e.g. the toning is not stable and even after the coin is withdrawn from the heat and/or chemical environment the coins toning will proceed relatively quickly towards a dark or black appearance. Does anyone know how stable the toning is on coins that have been put in a TB napkin once the coins have been removed from the napkin? >>
Paper induced toning should be very stable. The unstable AT's are produced by less innocent, more chemical means.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
1883 No Cents Liberty 5c MS63
1937-S 10c MS60
1946-S 25c MS64
1955-D 25c MS63
1956 25c PF65
1948-D 50c MS63
1958 50c PF67CAM
1995 SAE MS
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
<< <i>I'm experimenting with Kotex. >>
Now aren't we coin collectors a different bunch. LOL. Couldn't resist.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
<< <i>I'm experimenting with Kotex. >>
Just don't try to swallow them
Jim
Menomonee Falls Wisconsin USA
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistr...dset.aspx?s=68269&ac=1">Musky 1861 Mint Set
Actually went to Taco Bell with the intent of getting a napkin or two and trying out this toning experiment.
But, made a mess of myself eating a burrito, so had to use the several napkins I had to clean myself up.
Oh well, perhaps next trip!
<< <i>Just wondering. My understanding of one of the problems of AT is that you've accelerated the whole toning aspect, e.g. the toning is not stable and even after the coin is withdrawn from the heat and/or chemical environment the coins toning will proceed relatively quickly towards a dark or black appearance. Does anyone know how stable the toning is on coins that have been put in a TB napkin once the coins have been removed from the napkin? >>
The coin has been out for some time and not one once of change. Toning looks very stable!
My guinea pig coins are 50-D/S Wash quarter in 64 and a 64 Kennedy half in 63. Both have excellent luster.
Tom
<< <i>I put mine in a Taco Bell napkin 2 weeks ago (2 coins, 2 seperate napkins). However, I stored them in a U.S.Mint coin bag and put them in a metal filing cabinet drawer. Let's see if it works.
My guinea pig coins are 50-D/S Wash quarter in 64 and a 64 Kennedy half in 63. Both have excellent luster.
Tom >>
Tom I think you have the coin with the most value in a napkin! 50 D/S is not a cheap coin. Good Luck!
Oh yeah!
Tom
Ohhhhhhhhh!!!! The napkin? No wonder I wasn't getting any tone.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
<< <i>Do Mcdonalds Napkins or Jack In The Box napkins also work?
Nope, not that I know of. I hear Wendy's napkins do. >>
Actually, Wendy's napkins will leave a fingerprint...
Cheers,
Bob
I've had 6 coins wrapped in ZAXBY's napkins for about 6 weeks.....nothing
btw, Zaxby's is a chicken restuarant that started in Statesboro, Ga by two college students and now they're everywhere! The napkins from there were brown so I thought they had to have some kinda something in 'em. no such luck.
I put a BU Morgan, Merc, Walker, ASE, a VF cleaned CBH and a UNC polished Buffalo nickel in them and set a bag of rolled Red wheates on them so the napkins would touch the surface of the coins.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
<< <i>I'm experimenting with Kotex. >>
Did you wrap a Susan B. Anthony?
Thanks for reminding me. I'd forgotten about them!
Obscurum per obscurius
How's this
Jim
Menomonee Falls Wisconsin USA
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistr...dset.aspx?s=68269&ac=1">Musky 1861 Mint Set
Box of 20
<< <i>
How's this
Jim >>
What caused that???
It only took 5 weeks and wasn't heated
Jim
Menomonee Falls Wisconsin USA
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistr...dset.aspx?s=68269&ac=1">Musky 1861 Mint Set
the dime came out mostly black and spotty but the quarter came out better with just some yellowish rim toning.
dont think i save either one. just through em in my change jug to be rolled and deposited to the bank some day.