Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Compare the artwork - "No Drapery" type vs. "With Drapery" type - Quarters

BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,983 ✭✭✭✭✭
Although the liberty seated design appeared on our coinage from more than 50 years, Ms. Liberty did go though some changes over that time. The most obvious of these were the differences between the "No Drapery" and "With Drapery." The drapery refers to an extra fold of cloth that appears on Ms. Liberty’s left arm. Christian Gobrecht’s original design did not include that, and there were some other subtle differences.

Here are the two designs side by side. Which one do think is the more attractive, excluding, of course the grades of the coins which are AU-58 and MS-64 respectively.

imageimage

imageimage
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Comments

  • Options
    ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
    I prefer the 'with Drapery' design, though I'm not sure why it was necessary to make that addition.

    I would also observe, as has been noted here in the past, that Lady Liberty had hammy arms.

  • Options
    LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    I like the with drapery.

    And to CCU's point, even after spending time in the gym, I could never have pipes like that.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • Options
    First let me say that I like your 1839 no drapery Seated half very much, and would be very happy to have a coin like that in my type set.
    Artistically, I think the 'with drapery' type is more fluid and pleasing to the eye.

  • Options
    OKbustchaserOKbustchaser Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭✭✭
    without
    Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,983 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I like the with drapery.

    And to CCU's point, even after spending time in the gym, I could never have pipes like that. >>



    You have to remember. In the 19th century chubby women were thought to be far more attractive than they are today. One aspect of that may have been that they were viewed as more healthy and able to bear children. It was not unusual for a woman to have 5 to 10 or more children in those days. Of course infant mortality rates were quite high, and many of those child did not live to adulthood.

    For example Abraham and Mary Lincoln had four children. Two of them died in childhood while one (Tad) lived to be 19. Only the eldest, Robert, survived to live a full adult life.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    ledzep87ledzep87 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭
    Without
    Great transaction with: Relaxn, Collectorcoins, OKCC
  • Options
    I like the without better. You are comparing it to one with a motto on the reverse. I like the no motto better there too. To me I want to see Liberty's arms. I also don't want to be distracted from looking at the eagle. In general I prefer simpler designs.

    For a nation that has so many overweight people I think we should learn to love the way Liberty looks. These twig like models we see on TV are just not healthy and look very weak and fragile to me. I'm sure they could never help with the plowing. image
  • Options
    ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Without drapery. (even better----no drapery no stars!)

    Bill, great point with the beauty standards of the day, but the with drapery looks like she's not chubby, but pumping 'roids! Her arms look more disproportionate in the w/drapery design.

    All that said, I love the seated lib design. It's a design that covers a lot of ground in U.S history.
  • Options
    LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,756 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the no drapery artwork better.
    The face on liberty with drapery looks really goofy.

    The no drapery looks much more pleasing.
  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a fan of the No Drapery design. Take the stars away as well and I'm really happy.
  • Options
    ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I like the with drapery.

    And to CCU's point, even after spending time in the gym, I could never have pipes like that. >>



    You have to remember. In the 19th century chubby women were thought to be far more attractive than they are today. One aspect of that may have been that they were viewed as more healthy and able to bear children. It was not unusual for a woman to have 5 to 10 or more children in those days. Of course infant mortality rates were quite high, and many of those child did not live to adulthood.

    For example Abraham and Mary Lincoln had four children. Two of them died in childhood while one (Tad) lived to be 19. Only the eldest, Robert, survived to live a full adult life. >>



    Interesting points, as usual.
  • Options
    TavernTreasuresTavernTreasures Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭
    without drapery-beautiful
    Advanced collector of BREWERIANA. Early beer advertising (beer cans, tap knobs, foam scrapers, trays, tin signs, lithos, paper, etc)....My first love...U.S. COINS!
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,983 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm a fan of the No Drapery design. Take the stars away as well and I'm really happy. >>



    Sorry. The mint never made a No Stars quarter. image

    But I will agree with you that the No Stars design was cleaner and more attractive. It was kind of like a little cameo.

    image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,354 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Sorry. The mint never made a No Stars quarter. >>

    And I've always thought that was one of their bigger mistakes. The no stars design on the larger coins would have been magnificent.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file