Half Dimes: Why so many in such good condition available?

Can someone give us a history lesson on Seated Half Dimes. Why are they so plentiful in such good condition? Imagine an everyday small denomination 150yr old coin available in MS condition by the thousands. This is not like a silver dollar where many barely circulated. Is there an explanation?
I just picked up 3 of them in 64 & 65 for less than some Lincoln proofs! The one thing I don't like about them they are tiny and really meant for younger eyes! Otherwise a great value and tons of history.
I just picked up 3 of them in 64 & 65 for less than some Lincoln proofs! The one thing I don't like about them they are tiny and really meant for younger eyes! Otherwise a great value and tons of history.
0
Comments
Nice, choice and gem original half dimes are far and few between
considering 70-90% of what's on the market are very marginal pieces. Appealing and technically "all there" 64's thru 66's are no brainers if you are lucky enough to find them. Same is true of all the MS seated liberty pieces.
roadrunner
Here's one I just "baked", I have been staring at it all day!
Actually, near complete is not accurate. I collect only the rare coins in each series and ignore the common dates; so I guess near complete collection of the keys would be more correct.
When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
Thomas Paine
That miniature Gobrecht "dollar" is a really great coin. The simplicity and elegance of the no-stars obverse is amazing!
No stars variety is my favorite.
if your considering collecting half-dimes, i highly recommend. even the keys can generally be bargained down considerably off retail. singly, the coins may not appeal to most collectrors, but when you have a real nice collection of 'em, grouped together, it is something you can take great pride in.
K S
Tom
Bad part is you can't see the design in naked eyes
You make an excellent observation that "smaller" size coins are often passed over in favor of larger ones by some collectors. This is often the case with collectors new to numismatics who tend to lurch toward "large" coins like Morgan Dollars and $20 Libertys. However, many of our greatest numismatic treasures can be found in smaller size coinage. Consider the amazing 1802 Half Dime. A true American Classic by anyones standard. How about the 1913 Liberty Nickel Proof? Small coin! MONSTER numismatic appeal. What about the 1792 Half Disme? Small coin. Of course, there are MANY more "small coin" numismatic treasures: 1909 VDB Matte Proof Lincoln Cent, 1877 Indian Cent, 1914-D Lincoln Cent, 1868 3cs, 1877 3cn, 1877 Shield Nickel, KEY Buffalos, 1872 2c businsess strike, etc, etc.
While the 1804 Dollar (large coin) brought the largest buck so far (3 million plus), many of the other "big tickets" were SMALL coins (most?). Furthermore, that famous CHILDS 1804 Dollar was an extraordinary example graded PCGS PR68!!! None of the "big ticket" smaller coins were graded anywhere near that high. One can only imagine how much a 1913 Liberty Nickel PROOF in PCGS PR68 would sell for.
Nevertheless DesertLizard, you are correct that Half Dimes can offer extraordinary historical and numismatic value. Like anything else though, it requires a KEEN understanding of the Series, knowledge of the dates, and as always: A GOOD EYE!
matteproof
They're not very common in mint state if you count hard numbers, but low demand means there are more than enough of the common dates to go around.
Obscurum per obscurius
<< <i>I can think of one person who might want to add to this post... >>
I can think of two.
Half dimes fall into the cracks. Most collectors only want them for type. There fewer date collectors that there are in other series, and even fewer die varitey collectors, except for the early dates and the Classic heads (1829 - 1837).
K S
Half dimes are definitely way too common to be worth collecting. Just check the PCGS population report and you'll see that you should forget about half dimes and start buying BU Morgan dollars, or perhaps hoarding 1909-S VDB Lincolns.
That's a beauty!
I got these two from board members and was happy to get them at the level I did. I know they're not common with this look:
rhedden, WOW!
rhedden is that the 1860 transitional?
Take another close look at the beautiful half dime that Rhedden posted ......... and ask yourself this question:
What country issued that coin?
Voila! You have answered your own question. Yes, it is the 1860 Transitional J-267.
<< <i>"rhedden is that the 1860 transitional?"
Take another close look at the beautiful half dime that Rhedden posted ......... and ask yourself this question:
What country issued that coin?
Voila! You have answered your own question. Yes, it is the 1860 Transitional J-267. >>
From Judd's 9th Ed.: "Transitional issue made as a numismatic delicacy, in circulation strike format (Mint State rather than Proof)."
Numismatic delicacy is a very cool term!
in it. One major factor that is frequently overlooked is that lower denominations are much
less expensive to set aside than larger denominations. Usually this results in larger num-
bers of pristine smaller coins than larger ones.
Different denominations are often used very differently but very light coins often escape
a lot of wear because much of the wear to which coins are subjected is caused by being
mixed in with other coins of the same low weight such as in a cash register or counting
machine. This means that coins sliding on it from above tend to be lighter.
<< <i>"rhedden is that the 1860 transitional?"
Take another close look at the beautiful half dime that Rhedden posted ......... and ask yourself this question:
What country issued that coin?
Voila! You have answered your own question. Yes, it is the 1860 Transitional J-267. >>
The Coin Without A Country!
Have we truly strayed that far, that we have to dig back into the ancient archives to find some truly interesting and (dare we say it?) some educational postings?
<< <i>I find it quite interesting to read some of these older threads that Barndog is digging up from the archives, many from a time before I joined the CU Forum. For a moment there, until I read the original dates of posting, I was almost fooled into thinking that suddenly the members here were having serious discussions about numismatic subjects. But alas, it was not to be. I was rather abruptly returned to the present, to a mind-numbing dose of such numismatic delights as "What is the largest coin that you have ever passed through your colon?", "If Mel Gibson sold coins, would you buy from him?", "What is a wannabe dealer?", and my own particular favorite, "Should something as interesting and educational as the 'Word of the Day' be considered off-topic, and therefore banned?".
Have we truly strayed that far, that we have to dig back into the ancient archives to find some truly interesting and (dare we say it?) some educational postings? >>
There's plenty back there, but there are also plenty with 2005 and 2006 dates attached. Just requires a bit more sifting.
<< <i>I find it quite interesting to read some of these older threads that Barndog is digging up from the archives, many from a time before I joined the CU Forum. For a moment there, until I read the original dates of posting, I was almost fooled into thinking that suddenly the members here were having serious discussions about numismatic subjects. But alas, it was not to be. I was rather abruptly returned to the present, to a mind-numbing dose of such numismatic delights as "What is the largest coin that you have ever passed through your colon?", "If Mel Gibson sold coins, would you buy from him?", "What is a wannabe dealer?", and my own particular favorite, "Should something as interesting and educational as the 'Word of the Day' be considered off-topic, and therefore banned?".
Have we truly strayed that far, that we have to dig back into the ancient archives to find some truly interesting and (dare we say it?) some educational postings? >>
Don't open the threads. If you know they're garbage before you open them, then don't.
Responding to these threads or posts like this one or the quoted one then you are simply
encouraging it. The same with flaming threads; there's no reason to open them and if you
do then there is no reason to respond.
This place is what we make it. There are still lots of good threads so why dwell on the bad
ones?
OK. I'm off the soapbox and intend to stay off and follow my own advice. I'm very sorry for
the interruption.