Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

The crackout game has another winner

partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
I can't find the original thread I created about the subject coin. We went round and round. And yes no questions asked, it is the same coin.

1866 NGC MS65 Seated Quarter from the February Goldberg auction, that sold for $5k.

Goldberg 1866 MS65 25c

It soon after ended up in David Lawrence's inventory and was stripped of its skin and became an MS66 washed out widget.

Well it sat in David Lawrence's inventory and didn't sell. They where asking around $8k for it.

So it was put in the most recent Heritage Auction and was just sold for $11.5k.

Heritage 1866 MS66 25c



If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,285 ✭✭✭
    Looks like two different coins to me:


    imageimage
    imageimage
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Naturally. Stripped widgets with big grades are in great demand. Like this is news?
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    Someone got Lucky ! Who said, it's difficult to make $$$$--W.Buffet
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭

    Looks to be the same coin. Great example of "before and after". image

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    StuartStuart Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The crackout game may have another winner, but in this case (and many others like it) numismatics is the loser, because in one's desire to maximize profit we have not been responsible curators of our historic relics. imageimage

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • Options
    HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,729 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Someone put a little extra cash in their pocket. This Seated Quarter was stripped of her dignity, to bad. Say no to dipping, unless it means putting $5,000.00 in your wallet image
  • Options
    TrinkettsTrinketts Posts: 1,699 ✭
    It's the same coin there is a hit on the knee you can see on the larger images at Heritage. Just below the kneecap... it also shows on the toned version. Quite sad...
    Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing about. -Benjamin Franklin-
  • Options
    RampageRampage Posts: 9,699 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The image in the second coin looks cleaned. I would have bought and been real happy with the coin in the first image. Yes, they are the same coin, but now I would not want it.
  • Options
    TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭✭
    I agree I would not want the second coin.....

    A coin from 1866 should not look like it was made yesterday
    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The crackout game may have another winner, but in this case (and many others like it) numismatics is the loser, because in one's desire to maximize profit we have not been responsible curators of our historic relics.

    We can't protect every coin. The idiots will always take their toll. All the more reason to carefully choose the coins that go into your collection. Those are the coins you can protect.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    I wonder if that was yet another piece rewarded by NGC after being a helpless victim of the NCS curators, or just your average idiot with a jar of Jeweluster?
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I wonder if that was yet another piece rewarded by NGC after being a helpless victim of the NCS curators, or just your average idiot with a jar of Jeweluster? >>



    That's a good question. I would hope that that was an amateur job, and not something that NCS would do. Sadly, if that coin were cracked and NOT dipped, it probably would have received a 66 anyway.

    Still, with all those hairlines, 66 appears way too generous.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wish the idiot graders at the top tier grading services wouldn't reward this kind of behavior.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Still, with all those hairlines, 66 appears way too generous.

    If you're referring to the lines that run from 10 to 4 o'clock, those are die striations. You'll see them on all (or virtually all) mint state 1866 quarters.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    TarmacTarmac Posts: 394 ✭
    You have to wonder who ponied up $11.5k for a washed out widget which sat motionless in DL inventory for x weeks. image

    Who stripped it? David Lawrence?

    As long as the TPG and buyers reward this activity it will continue.
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I wish the idiot graders at the top tier grading services wouldn't reward this kind of behavior. >>


    Exactly! I thought the TPG's were supposed to be friends of the collector. image
    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    the first pictures were of a beautiful coin with lots of character and history....

    wish I could say the same about the second set of photos.
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    Not sure who did the dirty work. I would assume it was DL though. As it first appeared in there inventory shortly after the February Auction.

    The worst part about this is the coin, was such a gem. Just try and find another 66 quarter with a full shield strike on the reverse, and original surfaces.

    This was an early die state, which had just started showing weakness on the obverse stars.

    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    ledzep87ledzep87 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭
    The original was breathtaking; I would have been honored to own it! Now, I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. image
    Great transaction with: Relaxn, Collectorcoins, OKCC
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    I'm surprised that depth of toning could be removed without completely destroying the luster.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Boy, the first coin is a beautiful coin I would love to own.

    The second is a piece or crap!!!!!!!!!!!

    Get a ROPE!!!!!!!!
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe I am missing something, but I can't see why this coin (assuming its the same coin) needed a dip.

    Because it's more profitable to offer people what they want rather than what they should want.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,108 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I can't speak to what holder it is/was in or whether it was dipped or not, but....

    I will say that in photographing coins, I can make the same coin look like two different coins. Just recently, I was imaging a dime that had light golden peripheral toning and when I pulled the picture up on the computer that area looked completely black! You would not have believed that they were the same coin. I adjusted my camera settings and retook the picture until I made the picture an accurate representation of the coin.
    Doug
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,847 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Maybe I am missing something, but I can't see why this coin (assuming its the same coin) needed a dip. >>



    It didn't need a dip. PCGS and NGC rewards the dippers with higher grades and greedy dealers know this. They don't care about the hobby or the coins. They only care about the bottom line.



    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>PCGS and NGC rewards the dippers with higher grades and greedy dealers know this. They don't care about the hobby or the coins. They only care about the bottom line. >>



    That "bottom line" only exists because collectors are buying the coins.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,847 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>PCGS and NGC rewards the dippers with higher grades and greedy dealers know this. They don't care about the hobby or the coins. They only care about the bottom line. >>



    That "bottom line" only exists because collectors are buying the coins.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    New and ignorant collectors with more money that brains that think "shiny" is best. Yes, Russ, there is plenty of blame to go around.




    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭


    << <i>A coin like this is why I am on a mission to tell the world not to buy sightUNSEEN from auctions.

    While everyone here may smart enough not to, too many people do not know any better.

    Maybe I am missing something, but I can't see why this coin (assuming its the same coin) needed a dip. >>

    What you said Lauraimage
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That "bottom line" only exists because collectors are buying the coins.

    Snake oil salesmen used the same logic. Unfortunately for them, the uneducated masses ultimately learned their lesson.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Situations like this sicken me as much as the next guy (or gal). However, ther's lots of complaining, but not a solution mentioned...

    What's the solution? Perhaps a "OS" on a holder signifying original surfaces? A correction in grading policies that reward shiny coins with higher grades? Collectors just keeping originally toned coins away from dipping hoping that the market will eventually catch up?

    Just wondering...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    Mike, awareness is the simple answer. However it won't be the solution. As we can't change what some will want for there collections.

    Make people aware of what sometimes happens to nice originals, and show the end results. Trying to influence them to buy original and shun the shiny crap.

    The reason I am posting and tracking this coin is to help make others (lurkers, newb's) who may not know about this practice aware. Pay up for originality and don't buy stripped crap. As all you do is reward the dippers.

    I like the original surfaces tag, but I don't know how feasible that is. It is simply easiar to pay for eye appealing coins, and pass on those that have been conserved.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    clackamasclackamas Posts: 5,615 ✭
    DL coins, alothough fully culpable is this misdeed are not the sole bad guys here. TPG companies should have had that coinin a 66 holder to begin with, knowing what the coin would look like stripped of its character.

  • Options
    ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,743 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For the last five years or so, coins with original surfaces which aren't blazers (which are toned coins, but not toned unattractively) have been punished by the TPGs. Re silver, unless your coin is a monster, it needs to be bright & white if you want it to be in the most expensive holder.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Options
    BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm surprised that depth of toning could be removed without completely destroying the luster.

    Russ, NCNE >>


    Don't foget that first pic is from Goldbergs. Their pics tend to exaggerate toning.
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Don't foget that first pic is from Goldbergs. Their pics tend to exaggerate toning. >>

    I wonder what a Bondman picture would have looked like. image
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Just wondering...Mike >>

    Mike, my "solution" would be to have the grading companies penalize, rather than reward the dipping and "conversation" of coins. >>

    Coins can talk? I know I used to wonder, "if only this coin could talk and say where it's been..." image
  • Options
    I am sorely disappointed to see this coin getting stripped of all its original surfaces. It looked so good before the dip. Now, it is missing its luster and as someone said, its dignity. Very sad. I'd love to own the coin in the first picture for owning the coin. Of course, I'd love to have the 11.5K it took to buy the dipped version. But not the coin.

    Jonathan
    I have been a collector for over mumbly-five years. I learn something new every day.
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
    WHO sends coins to NCS ?
    I know the culprit after NCS is NGC, but... the blame or the shame goes to the submitter of the coin.
    It's like a make-over and stupid people with lot's of spending power think they are getting something for their buck. They are ............ a real BANG ( now define BANG)

    In my younger days, to get banged was to get screwed. Someone got banged real good.

    I'd feel sorry for them, but they obviously don't need my pity. They have enough money to buy professional help.

    Practice makes perfect & nobody is perfect. So, practice being nobody and be perfect !

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    WHO sends coins to NCS ?

    I do. Most of the time I'm pleased with the results.

    Does that mean I approve of what was done to the 1866 quarter? Of course not. For that matter, I don't even know if NCS was responsible for that coin.

    When I send a coin to NCS, it has a problem that I don't know how to solve myself. Better to pay a pro to do the job right than to risk messing up the coin myself.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Okay Andy... that answers my question. And of course with that statement you also admit the coins you submit do have a problem. Obviously the coin in this thread had no problem before, but does now.

    and I still have no pity for a guy that can spend that kind of money on a coin that is dipped and stripped. NCS or not image


    Joe

    Practice makes perfect & nobody is perfect. So, practice being nobody and be perfect !

  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    Doesn't look like the same coin to me. Lets see some comparison pics.
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    Okay, a comparison pic.

    image

    The depth of the rim matches, and the tiny spot on the right breast matches.

    The spot on the right forearm doesn't match, none of the light scratches in the obverse field match,
    and the major spot to the right and below of the last 6 has evaporated.

    These are just some of the problems I have with matching up these two coins.
  • Options
    curlycurly Posts: 2,880 ✭
    I see a small ding on the cheek on the right coin.....I don't see it on the left.


    The 3rd and 4th stars on the left appear a little stronger than on the right.

    I don't know though....I'll leave this to you experts.
    Every man is a self made man.
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    I wish we could find the old thread about this coin Shylock. As we argued and the consensus was it is the same coin.

    There are less then 18 coins graded 65 or higher. This is a rare early die state. Almost all seated 1866 quarters have shield weakness on the reverse due to die damage. As all coins where struck from the same dies.

    Some one did an overlay and it matched.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    partagaspartagas Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭
    Curly the cheek hit is there. The coin has been shot at different angles. You will see if you blow up the goldbergs pic a small whitish line. This is the ding. I have a 1860 dollar with a similiar ding on the cheek. I can hide it by shooting from different angles

    1860 $

    The mark on the Dollars face his hidden well in this shot. But it is similiar in depth as the Heritage pics.
    If I say something in the woods, and my wife isn't around. Am I still wrong?
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    The Goldberg coin VS. the Heritage & David Lawrence version.

    image
    image

    Three different coins?
  • Options
    Looking at the reverses, there appers to be some sort of bump on the Goldberg coin between the second "A" in "America" and the eagle's wing. I don't see it on the Heritage coin. I'm not saying they're different coins, I'm just pointing this out for consideration . . . .
    image
  • Options
    CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
    Does it really matter if they are the same? Does anyone think the Heritage and DLRC coin or coins were not dipped?

    CG
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that's not convinced that they are the same coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Does it really matter if they are the same?

    Maybe. Could be that the dipped out six was black, corroded and discovered in the ruins of a torched outhouse. In that case, who could complain? Except maybe the Fatman...
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>WHO sends coins to NCS ?

    I do. Most of the time I'm pleased with the results. >>



    Ditto, and ditto. In fact I just got a 1962 proof Frankie back today with which they did a wonderful job. They reduced an enormous reverse spot to barely a whisper without any decrease in mirror depth.

    Russ, NCNE

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file