Options
Grade revealed: A Missouri commem for your opinions - AT or NT? And, if applicable, guess the grade?
coinguy1
Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭

0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
55
Russ, NCNE
HA!!!! 3 to 1............you are the weakest link, goodbye.
<< <i>Russ,
HA!!!! 3 to 1............you are the weakest link, goodbye. >>
We shall see.
Russ, NCNE
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
<< <i>Russ bashers >>
?
I resemble that remark!!
I accidently bought an Alabama commem recently that had original looking neutral eye appeal toning and then when I brought it home and looked at it under better light I could see hairlines under the toning. I was wondering why the dealer was selling an original toned Unc Commem for low AU money. The only thing I can't tell is whether it was wiped with a cloth long ago and the toning is NT or if the coin was AT'd to hide the hairlines.
Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum
I'll guess NGC graded this coin a 65, or even higher if the luster is all there (and if I know Mark's coins, it is). I see no rub and only a very few contact marks, and a very pretty NT Missouri...Mike
[edited to add NT comment]
That's my take on it anyway
Russ, NCNE
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
market acceptable toning
While I believe that the coin is accurately graded, in my view, those who guessed AU deserve no more credit than those who guessed choice mint state. The images really don't give it away, one way or the other.
One interesting thing that came up in this thread is a reminder that, as per human nature, responses can be affected by the person who is showing the coin. It is pretty well known that I usually deal in higher grade coins, especially when/if they are commemoratives. Some of the grade guesses were likely influenced on the high side, by that knowledge. Add to that, my reputation for sub-par imaging and the grade guesses, relative to the actual image, went higher still!
Likewise, when I see Dizzyfox post a commemorative here, right away, I am automatically thinking MS65 or higher. It would probably take an image of a blatantly lower graded coin to snap me out of that mindset.
Thanks for your participation.
<< <i>You guys think the coin is AU?
Russ, NCNE >>
A coin with wear like this cannot be MS--I would have thought that even you could grasp this simple concept!
<< <i>
<< <i>You guys think the coin is AU?
Russ, NCNE >>
A coin with wear like this cannot be MS--I would have thought that even you could grasp this simple concept! >>
But did you see his grade guess later in the thread? He (with a bit of help) nailed it at AU58. Next time, please read before you leap. Now, you must also weep.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>You guys think the coin is AU?
Russ, NCNE >>
A coin with wear like this cannot be MS--I would have thought that even you could grasp this simple concept! >>
But did you see his grade guess later in the thread? He (with a bit of help) nailed it at AU58. Next time, please read before you leap. Now, you must also weep.
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
I'd say this coin is probably an MS-63 (graded before I read the part where it is AU-58) and the toning on it is real or a least a number of years old. If the coin is in a MS-64 or higher holder I'd stay away from this piece because of the scratch to the right of the pioneer's nose.
Here' the coin that is in my set. It's in a PCGS MS-64 holder:
Yes, I know. Everytime I post a GTG, everyone guesses XF-40.