C'mon guys, you know it's not a proof, it's the one and only known 1895 business strike. You can verify its authenticity easily from the high-resolution image. The seller must have spent months getting that high-quality photo. He's even protecting your identity so people won't know how filthy rich you are. How can you miss?
As per my comments in another thread (about being nice to people):
It might very well be a scam - the initial images were fuzzy, bidder's identities are being kept private, the coin is uncertified, most Proof 1895 dollars aren't that heavily circulated, etc. However....
I have been in touch with the seller, who apparently has received some very rude emails (one or more of which I am guessing were from forum members). After I told her that her listing looked suspicious and my reasons for thinking it, she added clearer images to her listing and sounds as if she is on the up and up.
While I realize that the chances of the coin being an authentic 1895 Morgan dollar are extremely remote - at quick glance the "5" in the date looks wrong and I see no evidence that the coin was struck as a Proof - I don't think the seller is a scammer. I think she believes she has a genuine 1895 dollar.
Perhaps I'm wrong, as I often am. However, as long as it doesn't harm me, financially or otherwise, I'd rather give someone the benefit of the doubt and be wrong, than assume (and treat them as if) they are a scammer, a troll, etc. and be wrong about that.
Looks like a nice scrape job to me, right where the "O" was once a lot stronger.
But for those with more money to than brains, it's one of the long lost 12,000 business strikes that have yet to see the light of day, and in all likelihood, never will.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I also think it's a different coin, but it looks like the seller "riofresh" does buy 1895 silver dollars with removed mint marks. Circumstantial evidence, yes, but it's not helping the seller's credibility.
Most people don't sell $20,000 + coins for $5,000.
Even if neither PCGS nor NGC would grade it, it would be worth that in a SEGS holder.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Just for arguments sake lets assume the coin is the real deal, given the condition of the one on eBay, and that a PF61 sold for $18K in 2000 and a PF 64 sold for $24K in 2003, what do you think this coin is worth assuming the coin is in the vf + range?
Russ hit this nice- take a good look at the hair above the ear- same obverse, take a look at the left wing (facing) same reverse, I captured all images the coin is not a plain 95 business- it's a 95-O.
rifresh could be in for some big trouble if he ships that out as a 95P- thats a fed offense- fraud can git ya locked up.
<< <i>Just for arguments sake lets assume the coin is the real deal, given the condition of the one on eBay, and that a PF61 sold for $18K in 2000 and a PF 64 sold for $24K in 2003, what do you think this coin is worth assuming the coin is in the vf + range? >>
I'm guessing that a genuine example in a respected grading company's holder would be worth roughly $15,000.
7 bids as high as $14,000. All withdrawn or cancelled. The seller might as well stop the auction and try to get it authenticated by ANACS. Then there is a much better chance of actually making some real $$$. Otherwise it seems to be a waste of time and frustrating for the seller.
BECOKA, eBay does not allow a seller to cancel an auction during the last 12 hours. So the seller is going to have to keep refreshing and then cancelling bids. What the seller can do is add additional text teller bidders that she will not honor any bids and will cancel any bids placed. But a sniper may still get a bid in the last few seconds.
The seller protests too much -- if he/she is going to send it to PCGS, then why not do this before the auction and get 3x+ the money.
I like many are too tired of hearing about grandmother's or grandfather's coins and what a great deal they are giving the public. If you read the other link where this seller might have gotten the coin, he/she references his/her grandmother/father too.
Everrybody has their opinion and I think this one stinks!!
She say she is sending it to pcgs, looks like it might BB for cleaning, someone should tell her to send it to ANACS, not that it matters anyway--------------BigE
This seller truely has no clue whatsoever, The Thing I liked about it was they said they were going to send it to PCGS to get certified. THen after a long talk with a "Knowledgeable Coin Collector" he said screw it, I will let the auction end and the person that buys it can send it to PCGS.......
I don't think that the 2 coins listed are one in the same, there is no hit on the rim by the r in dollar on the reverse. The coin, however, in my opinion looks like an 1895 O with the o removed.
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
<< I just offered him a $100.00 bucks for it just like it is.... >>
No you didn't! I think "him" is a "her".
Well I did offer 'him' the 100, 'he' politely responded with a no thanks and then sent me an email stating that HE took it to a dealer and THEY did a visual, to find out that it is not a proof, nor was it a biz strike, and looks to be an O- definitely altered in the dealers opinion. I sent an email back suggesting that HE send it to Anacs for attribution as to what it really is - S or an O.
What made you all think it was a female selling the coin- becuz they used the word 'bully'?
Mark- you are right about one thing- there are more than just a few who jump the gun and accuse before finding out facts- this is childish and even though the coin was altered- it was probably a few morons from here giving this person crap- and in all honesty- WE should quit while we are ahead- some day it will come back and haunt you.
MORGANHUNTEr2, I think I got the "her" either from an email or Ebay's contact information. I don't recall which. I'm glad you apparently got through to her - good job.
Comments
too much downside risk here especially if seller is "only" starting at $5,000.
The Mysterious Egyptian Magic Coin
Coins in Movies
Coins on Television
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
It might very well be a scam - the initial images were fuzzy, bidder's identities are being kept private, the coin is uncertified, most Proof 1895 dollars aren't that heavily circulated, etc. However....
I have been in touch with the seller, who apparently has received some very rude emails (one or more of which I am guessing were from forum members). After I told her that her listing looked suspicious and my reasons for thinking it, she added clearer images to her listing and sounds as if she is on the up and up.
While I realize that the chances of the coin being an authentic 1895 Morgan dollar are extremely remote - at quick glance the "5" in the date looks wrong and I see no evidence that the coin was struck as a Proof - I don't think the seller is a scammer. I think she believes she has a genuine 1895 dollar.
Perhaps I'm wrong, as I often am. However, as long as it doesn't harm me, financially or otherwise, I'd rather give someone the benefit of the doubt and be wrong, than assume (and treat them as if) they are a scammer, a troll, etc. and be wrong about that.
Is that a shadow of an O?
Russ, NCNE
I would love to hear how those visits go!
I agree that the 5 looks immediately wrong, and the surfaces look like nothing other than a business strike.
No returns
$50 insurance
Bidder ID kept private
At least you can pay with paypal
Man oh man...another one
Where are these guys on my legit auctions???
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
But for those with more money to than brains, it's one of the long lost 12,000 business strikes that have yet to see the light of day, and in all likelihood, never will.
LINKY
Have a Great Day!
Louis
FYI PCGS has graded 68 coins below PF60 including 17 at VG to VF, so the wear on this coin if it is authentic is not completely out of the ordinary.
But bidders are taking a huge risk even at $5k in my opinion.
Michael
Even if neither PCGS nor NGC would grade it, it would be worth that in a SEGS holder.
<< <i>Is that a shadow of an O? >>
I think Russ might be on to something here.
Michael
Russ hit this nice- take a good look at the hair above the ear- same obverse, take a look at the left wing (facing) same reverse, I captured all images the coin is not a plain 95 business- it's a 95-O.
rifresh could be in for some big trouble if he ships that out as a 95P- thats a fed offense- fraud can git ya locked up.
<< <i>Just for arguments sake lets assume the coin is the real deal, given the condition of the one on eBay, and that a PF61 sold for $18K in 2000 and a PF 64 sold for $24K in 2003, what do you think this coin is worth assuming the coin is in the vf + range? >>
I'm guessing that a genuine example in a respected grading company's holder would be worth roughly $15,000.
Michael
<< <i>I don't think the seller is a scammer. I think she believes she has a genuine 1895 dollar. >>
Sorry, Mark, couldn't resist.
Russ, NCNE
I see it going to Anacs coming back- tooled, scratched and cleaned net F. 95-O
<< <i>I just offered him a $100.00 bucks for it just like it is.... >>
No you didn't! I think "him" is a "her".
<< I don't think the seller is a scammer. I think she believes she has a genuine 1895 dollar. >>
<<Sorry, Mark, couldn't resist.>>
No problem Russ. Fortunately, I had covered my butt by saying "Perhaps I'm wrong, as I often am" Whew!
Michael
I like many are too tired of hearing about grandmother's or grandfather's coins and what a great deal they are giving the public. If you read the other link where this seller might have gotten the coin, he/she references his/her grandmother/father too.
Everrybody has their opinion and I think this one stinks!!
The World Is REALLY an Amazing Place......
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't think the seller is a scammer. I think she believes she has a genuine 1895 dollar. >>
Sorry, Mark, couldn't resist.
Russ, NCNE >>
Maybe it was "a legitimate estate auction"
Sorry devil man, I couldn't resist.
Will’sProoflikes
No you didn't! I think "him" is a "her".
Well I did offer 'him' the 100, 'he' politely responded with a no thanks and then sent me an email stating that HE took it to a dealer and THEY did a visual, to find out that it is not a proof, nor was it a biz strike, and looks to be an O- definitely altered in the dealers opinion.
I sent an email back suggesting that HE send it to Anacs for attribution as to what it really is - S or an O.
What made you all think it was a female selling the coin- becuz they used the word 'bully'?
Mark- you are right about one thing- there are more than just a few who jump the gun and accuse before finding out facts- this is childish and even though the coin was altered- it was probably a few morons from here giving this person crap- and in all honesty- WE should quit while we are ahead- some day it will come back and haunt you.
I still offered the 100. waiting for a reply.