1840 gold $2.50 whats wrong?

Comments

• Options

  RYK Posts: 35,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 25, 2006 12:56PM

  That coin does not look authentic to me.

  My Box of 20: https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/box-20/ryks-gold-box-20/17132

  0
• Options

  grip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 26, 2006 8:36AM

  
  
  << <i>That coin does not look authentic to me. >>
  
  
  

  0
• Options

  tradedollarnut Posts: 20,148 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 26, 2006 9:47AM

  I agree. That's probably not a solder spot, but rather the spot where the metal was poured into a cast mold.

  Early Dollar Set

  0
• Options

  Cocoinut Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 27, 2006 12:50PM

  I have to agree with the others. The lettering and devices seem a little too mushy and indistinct, even considering that it's well-worn. Here's an 1847 for comparison (IMO undergraded by PCGS as an EF45):
  
  
  
  
  Jim
  

  Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 2 coins. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!

  0
• Options

  nankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭

  January 28, 2006 2:02PM

  Stevel48: Repeat after me-----I will never, never,never,never, again buy gold that is not certificated by PCGS, ANACS, or NGC.

  I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.

  0
• Options

  coinkat Posts: 22,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 29, 2006 10:47AM

  Sorry, but this looks... bad... real bad.

  Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  0