Last nights purchase 1877-s quarter, opinions? grade?

Rob41281 · December 15, 2005 10:52PM

i was thinking high EF to low AU

LanLord · December 15, 2005 10:57PM

Well, from the pic it's hard to tell. Is there any lustre there at all? I'd have a hard time giving it any AU if there's no lustre. But it is a way strong EF.

ziggy29 · December 15, 2005 11:00PM

I'd call it EF-45 based solely on this picture. As mentioned already, I'd like to have the coin in hand to determine the luster remaining, if any.

Rob41281 · December 15, 2005 11:01PM

looks like there may be some on the reverse, but ill have to see when i get it. the pics are the sellers

291fifth · December 15, 2005 11:10PM

Nice original XF40, but no better.

1907Quarter · December 15, 2005 11:18PM

I'm not sure, but the obverse looks cleaned/retoned to me....

lathmach · December 16, 2005 12:38AM

I was watching it but decided not to bid.
You got a real bargain. It's worth nearly double what you paid.
That's a nice original EF 45.

Ray

BECOKA · December 16, 2005 1:18AM

VF35-XF40. Hard to tell from the pic.

Rob41281 · December 16, 2005 5:28AM

when i get it, if theres a big difference in appearance ill post better pics. im happy with it as it looks from the sellers pics. i was just kinda looking thru ebay as i was falling asleep and for some reason i was just attracted to it as soon as i saw it

lordmarcovan · December 16, 2005 6:00AM

<< <i>I was watching it but decided not to bid.
You got a real bargain. It's worth nearly double what you paid.
That's a nice original EF 45. >>

Considering the source of this comment, I'd say that's high praise indeed.

Regulated · December 16, 2005 6:55AM

Looks choice XF to me - make sure you check the mintmark for an underlying horizontal "S."

Last nights purchase 1877-s quarter, opinions? grade?

Comments

Leave a Comment