Last nights purchase 1877-s quarter, opinions? grade?

Rob41281

i was thinking high EF to low AU

LanLord

Well, from the pic it's hard to tell. Is there any lustre there at all? I'd have a hard time giving it any AU if there's no lustre. But it is a way strong EF.

ziggy29

I'd call it EF-45 based solely on this picture. As mentioned already, I'd like to have the coin in hand to determine the luster remaining, if any.

Rob41281

looks like there may be some on the reverse, but ill have to see when i get it. the pics are the sellers

291fifth

Nice original XF40, but no better.

1907Quarter

I'm not sure, but the obverse looks cleaned/retoned to me....

lathmach

I was watching it but decided not to bid.
You got a real bargain. It's worth nearly double what you paid.
That's a nice original EF 45.

Ray

BECOKA

VF35-XF40. Hard to tell from the pic.

Rob41281

when i get it, if theres a big difference in appearance ill post better pics. im happy with it as it looks from the sellers pics. i was just kinda looking thru ebay as i was falling asleep and for some reason i was just attracted to it as soon as i saw it

lordmarcovan

<< <i>I was watching it but decided not to bid.
You got a real bargain. It's worth nearly double what you paid.
That's a nice original EF 45. >>

Considering the source of this comment, I'd say that's high praise indeed.

Regulated

Looks choice XF to me - make sure you check the mintmark for an underlying horizontal "S."