Options
Who Here Loves PNGS as a TPG
Just kidding......looks like another complete ripoff.
www.pngscoin.com
Have fun.
keoj
www.pngscoin.com
Have fun.
keoj
0
Comments
Note to their web designer: spell check is no substitute for proofreading!
And their claim that they have the "equivalent" of Intercept Shield is probably not going to go unchallenged.
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
<< <i>Their site says the coins are guaranteed genuine or they will pay the fare market value >>
.
In other words, they'll give you whatever the bus driver will pay for it.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>A Winning And Safe Combonation! >>
Also, I'm curious how NGC feels about another slab that looks way too much like theirs.
Link to the PNGS website
--Severian the Lame
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
--Severian the Lame
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>Spellcheck would not have flagged "FARE" vs. "FAIR" as it is not an incorrect spelling. >>
Than it wood not flag this miss take either.
Sorry, invalid excuse for ignorance and incompetence. And the fact that combonation (sic) is spelled incorrectly would suggest that a spell checker wasn't even used.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
<< <i>And those slabs a nothing like NGC slabs. >>
Hey, Conder101, cut me some slack, huh?
I hope you're joking
<< <i>I said they look disturbingly similar (to me). - Preussen >>
I agree wholeheartedly with Preussen. The plastic holder and the label look far too much alike to be a mere coincidence.
PCGS, ANACS, & NGC Certified Coins on My Website.
I hope you're joking
--Severian the Lame
Like most here, my opinion is that it's intentionally designed to confuse the consumer with NGC holders.
They probably already knew about this anyway, but just in case, now they will.
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
keoj
I am sure these guys will be a pox on our hobby just like all the others. But you all a grasping for straws if you think there is any legitimate claim of infringement by NGC here.
I have alerted Intercept Shield. Will be curious to see if a polite phone call does it or these guys hold out for a lawyer's nasty gram.
Then, NGC, PCGS, PNG, etc. can have their turns at 'em.
WH
<< <i>The holders and labels have little in common other than color. Date, Denomination, SN, Company Name are all placed in distinctly different locations. An entirely different font is used. What are you guys smoking? >>
You got us there.
There are only something like 18 million distinct colors in the spectrum. I'm sure they chose NGC's "warm autumn bronze" by coincidence. The square-edged label with a rounded field was entirely unintentional. And the white background with black letters and digits was just lucky chance.
As for distinct placement...four lines of data:
Top: date followed by type, then denomination
Middle top: grade
Middle bottom: serial number
Bottom: bar code
Complete coincidence. Though of course Anacs uses a different sequence altogether and PCGS includes a fifth line of information.
--Severian the Lame
<< <i>entirely unintentional >>
I never suggested the similarities are unintentional. I am quite sure they are very intentional. And all the differences are intentional as well. Fact is, NGC will have no infringement claim here. The products may be similar, but are too different for a legitimate claim. They may choose to make a claim just in hopes of putting a financial hit on the newcomers (likely scammers), but a good lawyer will quickly get it dismissed. However, I do see where Intercept Sheild could easily get them to remove their name from the website.
Monster toning!!
<< <i>Hey, Conder101, cut me some slack, huh? I didn't say the slabs are like NGC's, I said they look disturbingly similar (to me). - Preussen >>
Sorry, with it being my particular hang up I just glance at the slab and it just jumps out at me as being very different. I tend to forget that the differences may not be as obvious to others
Link to PNGS auction items
<< <i>
<< <i>Hey, Conder101, cut me some slack, huh? I didn't say the slabs are like NGC's, I said they look disturbingly similar (to me). - Preussen >>
Sorry, with it being my particular hang up I just glance at the slab and it just jumps out at me as being very different. I tend to forget that the differences may not be as obvious to others >>
Thanks
<< <i>I filled out the contact form over at NGC. Even if this company can grade coins well, the holder design is a complete ripoff.
Like most here, my opinion is that it's intentionally designed to confuse the consumer with NGC holders.
They probably already knew about this anyway, but just in case, now they will. >>
Got a response this morning from NGC:
"Thank you for your email. We are taking appropriate action to see that
it is changed.
I sincerely appreciate your efforts on NGC's behalf.
Best regards,
NGC Customer Service"
Go get 'em!
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set