Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

guess the grade -- 1956 proof Washington -- grade revealed

MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
I've really learned alot with these threads. Here's a series I don't see many "guess the grades" on. Try and guess the grade on this one, my latest NEWP:

image
image

Have fun...Mike


=================== Answer NGC PF 68* CAM ===================
Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.

Comments

  • Options
    PR68?? image
  • Options
    PR-66 CAM
  • Options
    7 cam
    image
  • Options
    nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    I'd say 6cam
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Hard to grade proofs from pics, but I'm with 100proof. I grade the pics 7 Cam.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,099 ✭✭✭
    Proof Sixty Seven Cameo!

    TorinoCobra71

    image
  • Options
    Gorgeous Washington quarter MikeInFL. Super contrast. I'd call it an pr67 at least. Nice photo skills too. imagematteproof
    Remember Lots Wife
  • Options
    I'll go with 66CAM.
  • Options
    That is my favorite year for modern proof sets!

    Since I can't see any hairlines from here I'd guess 68 Cam.
  • Options
    GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,856 ✭✭✭✭
    nice coin! I'll guess 68CAM as well.
    imageimage

  • Options
    TrimeTrime Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭
    Since I do not collect or grade Wahington quarters nor modern proofs, this showld be instructive. How can you grade a modern coin high quality 67+ proof from a picture in slab or plastic holder? The ultimate grade would be determined by hairlines that are not easily discernable from this picture. There are a few short lines in the reverse fieldsthat could be on the slab surface magnified by the reflection from the mirrored surfaces or even small lint outside the holder. The strike might be a little stronger. My guess is PR 68 CAM
    Trime
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Trime, I based my grade on the spotting on the lower left obverse, the lint mark in the right obverse field, the tick on the eagle's right wing and the one at 8:00 reverse rim. Ironically enough, although it's hard to spot hairlines in proof images, I just holdered a 56 like this one in PR67 Ucam and crossed it to PR67 Dcam that has noticeable hairlines in the right obverse field. They bugged me, but they're minor enough for both services to grade the coin 7. The grading opinion is just a guess with images, but that's how I'd grade the images anyway. It could easily be goldered 8 if those flaws are minor in hand.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    There are NO hairlines on this coin whatsoever. Grade a bit later this afternoon....Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PR68 cameo.

    Nice coin!

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,943 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Prf-67 C
  • Options
    pr67 cam
    Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Nobody got this exactly right... several deserve honorable mention...


    CarlWohlforth was the first, followed by GaCoinGuy, Trime, and Cameonut.

    The grade given by NGC is PF 68* CAM.

    This was my first purchase of a "*" coin. Picked it up on Teletrade on Monday for less than the price of a normal 68. It will reside in my type set.

    The coin has contact marks visible to the naked eye. Many of the marks in the photo are of dust and/or plastic particles from the NGC holder. There is what I'll describe as a milk spot below "TRUST" which is visible to the naked eye. The other visible flaw -- the break in frosting in the lower reverse lettering is much more pronounced in the photos than in hand. My guess as to why it didn't get DCAM is that the reverse cameo is not strong enough across the entire coin and the obverse, which is better, still shows some areas of lighter frosting on his neck.

    All in all I like the coin, but I've not seen nearly enough of these to form an opinion as to the "*" designation over other 68 CAMs.

    Thanks to all that participated. Have fun...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    TrimeTrime Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Mike, Nice coin for a modern proof. It will grow with th years.
    Can't judge* unless you explain it went to NGC as PCGS doesn't use the PQ designation.
    Trime
  • Options
    LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    Excellent coin Mike! Here's the same exact grade in a 57 (Scratch is on holder):


    image


    imageimage
  • Options
    everybody that guessed 67 thought it was a pcgs coin image
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Wow, you found one of my coin's 50 other brothers...

    As reference, here's the NGC population on the coin (the first num is PF the second is PF *):

    65: 6, 0
    66: 37, 2
    67: 121, 12
    68: 263, 50
    69: 102, 24
    70: 0

    Have fun...Mike

    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Mike, thanks for the post. Nice coin. Typically, NGC awards the star to modern proofs with one ucam side. This is a before shot of the one that crossed.

    image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file