Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Is an IHC 1869/69 considered a Mint Error? PCGS Results!

PCGS does not allow Mint Errors to be submitted for the 8 free submissions as a Platinum Member. I view the IHC 1869/69, SLQ 1918/7, and the Buffalo Nickel 1918/7 as varieties. Anyone have any experience with this type of coin in a submission? If PCGS accepts this coin would they label it as 1869/69? Thank you!

KoolCoin

Comments

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,923 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Indian Cent you mentioned is a Die Variety, and I would think
    (this is un-official) that if the coin is listed in the PCGS Numbering
    Book (or the Pop Report) with it's own PCGS #, then it should be
    qualified for the membership submission coins.....

    Just my opinion/view.......

    Fred
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • LALASD4LALASD4 Posts: 3,602 ✭✭✭
    Did PCGS say why they does not allow Mint Errors to be submitted for the 8 free submissions as a Platinum Member?
    Coin Collector, Chicken Owner, Licensed Tax Preparer & Insurance Broker/Agent.
    San Diego, CA


    image
  • PCGS has an ad in Coin World and it reads under Platinum Membership "A voucher for Eight FREE Submissions (US Coins Only-Excluding Mint Errors)"
  • sonofagunksonofagunk Posts: 1,349 ✭✭
    They do not want to be in the error game. They raised their prices a lot more for errors then for regular coins. They only want the MS69 modern coins to grade
  • LALASD4LALASD4 Posts: 3,602 ✭✭✭
    Maybe Fred charge them too much.
    Coin Collector, Chicken Owner, Licensed Tax Preparer & Insurance Broker/Agent.
    San Diego, CA


    image
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I guess I have to agree with the expert, Fred.

    The 1869 over 69 wasn't really an error. It was a reflection of the die prepartion process of the period.

    The definitions do get blurry. Was the 1955 doubled die cent an error? I'd say that it was, but it was a massed produced error.

    Usuall when I think of an error it's a one time thing - multiple strikes, off-center strikes, capped dies, whatever.

    BUT blundered dies could be called errors too IMO.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    Not a mint error -- it's merely a repunched digit in the date. For many years this was called an "1869 over 8," but it appears that it's just a repunched 9, not an overdate.
  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,449 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've seen some submit coins to PCGS under the mint error category just to bring attention to a variety NOT recocnized by PCGS.

    Had a 1868 DDO, for instance, labeled "Mint Error". Have seen others too. ANACS recognizes a wide spectrum of varieties and experts like Larry Steve have used them extensively for this purpose.
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭
    KoolCoin.....FWIW, when I sent in my free submissions for platinum memebrship about 1 1/2 years a 37-D 3 legged buffalo and a 1939 DDR Jeff were included and they graded both of them.....I no longer belong so I'm not sure if they would still accept them for grading, but they used to.

    Hope this helps


    Rob
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's both a variety and a mint error. The mint didn't intentionally create a die with doubling in the date.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,923 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just to keep the record clear, I have NEVER been
    paid by PCGS for authentication and describing
    coins for their Major (Mechanical) Mint Error
    Coin program.

    Been doin' it since 1998 or early 1999, literally
    out of the desire to help the error hobby, and
    help promote errors. Yes, it does benefit me
    as a dealer in Mint Errors, but again, I've never
    been paid......

    Fred Weinberg
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,923 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As to why PCGS won't accept Errors for their Membership Program,
    I assume (not official in any way) that because Errors take a few
    extra steps to processs, it doesn't pay for PCGS to do it for the free
    membership coin submission.

    Don't forget, for a normal coin, PCGS plugs in the coin #, and grade,
    and the computer generates the tag.

    For MINT ERRORS, every single coin (not counting those die varieties
    in the PCGS book with numbers) must be HAND TYPED IN for the tag;
    this is because all errors are basically "one of a kind", as far as 98% of
    the descriptions go........

    This is also the reason David Hall agreed with me NOT to list them in the
    PCGS POP Reports --- not only would almost every coin show up as
    a "Pop 1", which could be grossly mis-used by telemarketers, but it would
    take up about the same amount of space as the Los Angeles or New York
    Phone book to list every single coin, one line at a time.

    Hope this helps clear up a few things......

    Fred
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • Great Response! I'm going to give it a try. I'll Favorite this thread and let you all know what the outcome is.

    Thanks,

    KoolCoin George
  • LALASD4LALASD4 Posts: 3,602 ✭✭✭
    One would think that for $40.00 an error, PCGS would at least give something to Fred.
    Coin Collector, Chicken Owner, Licensed Tax Preparer & Insurance Broker/Agent.
    San Diego, CA


    image
  • coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭
    The definition between what is actually a mint error and a die variety are very clearly defined, and all repunched dates, mintmarks, and doubled dies are die varieties, not mint errors.

    With that being said, however, PCGS recognizes a certain list of die varieties for which they include a die number on the label. EVERYTHING ELSE that's either actually an error or a die variety that's not on their list of diesgoes into "mint error" submission. It's a mix-up of terms on their part, just like eBay has an "errors" category under which people have to list die varieties to sell them, even though they are not technically considered "errors."

    These are both cases in mix-ups of terms by professional services that are a large part of why collectors can't seem to get the difference in terms and what coins are what.

    die variety - some sort of doubling, hub doubling, date doubling, or mintmark doubling, that is on the die when the die is placed into service on the coining press. ALL coins minted with that die show the doubling and are termed die varieties. ALL die varieties are created during the die making process, not by way of the actual coining process.

    error - machine malfunction problems that show on the coins minted. Divided into three separate sub-types, errors are generally from coin to coin (except in the case of die errors) and are usually NOT on the die when the die is placed into service. Nearly all errors are created during the coining process, not in the die making process.

    and as an added footnote:

    variety - a notable change in the design for a given type within a single year. Sometimes intentional, sometimes not necessarily intentional. Usually not intended to be noticed. Things like large letters and small letters, large date, small date, large mintmark, small mintmark are included in this category. ALL varieties are elements of the design on the die, so they are created during the master die making process from two (or more) differently styled master hubs.
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image
  • I received the results from the 8 coin submission with pcgs membership. And the 1869/69 came back labeled just 1869! I received the AU50 grade I was hoping for. My other 7 coins went as follows: 1909-S Indian - AU58 (just as I bought it), 1872 Indian - VF30 ( Iwas hoping for an XF40, also the coin was of the Shallow N variety - no recognition), 1914-D Lincoln VF35 ( I bought it as a F12!!), 1893-CC $ VF30(I wanted a VF25). 1889-CC $ VF35 (I wanted a VF30), 1894 $ XF45 (bought as an XF40), and a 1932-D Washington - CEANED - (OK, I bought the coin 15 years ago and it still has the degree of toning today?!). All in all, I am very happy with my first submission; just wish they could have recognized the 1869/69. 15 day turn around out the door!!! Good job pcgs!! Did anyone hear that the 1869/69 will be recognized in the Red Book next year?

    KoolCoin
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I received the results from the 8 coin submission with pcgs membership. And the 1869/69 came back labeled just 1869! >>

    Well, if you look at the PCGS price guide, you'll see they don't even list 1869/9. That typically means it's a die variety that they don't recognize on the slab.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    the 1869/69 is a totally ridiculously overhyped "error". actually, it's a die-variety, but it's not much different then the myriad die varieties (ie repunched dates, longacre doubling , etc) prevalent in the series. the only reason it gets so much attention is because of it's long-time inclusion in old coin boards, like whitman classic albums. i do not have 1 in my set, nor do i care to.

    K S
  • ddbirdddbird Posts: 3,168 ✭✭✭


    << <i>1893-CC $ VF30(I wanted a VF25). 1889-CC $ VF35 (I wanted a VF30) >>



    Really...I would be happy with the VF 30 and VF35 image
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>the 1869/69 is a totally ridiculously overhyped "error". actually, it's a die-variety, but it's not much different then the myriad die varieties (ie repunched dates, longacre doubling , etc) prevalent in the series. the only reason it gets so much attention is because of it's long-time inclusion in old coin boards, like whitman classic albums. i do not have 1 in my set, nor do i care to. >>

    And the main reason it was included in the Red Book, Whitman albums, et cetera, is that for many years it was believed to be an 1869/8 overdate rather than just a repunched digit.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file