Hypothetical #10 - Collector sells Added Mintmark
Suppose you're an experienced collector. You buy a PCGS AU-58 1914-D Lincoln from another collector. You think it's undergraded so you crack it and resubmit it. This time, PCGS says the mintmark has been added. You show it around and the consensus is that the coin has indeed been altered. Even though the coin is no longer in the PCGS holder, does the seller have to give you your money back?
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
<< <i>Suppose you're an experienced collector. You buy a PCGS AU-58 1914-D Lincoln from another collector. You think it's undergraded so you crack it and resubmit it. This time, PCGS says the mintmark has been added. You show it around and the consensus is that the coin has indeed been altered. Even though the coin is no longer in the PCGS holder, does the seller have to give you your money back? >>
No - see answer to hypothetical #9
<< <i>you cracked it you own it >>
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
You had a chance to use PCGS guarantee
Yes - return the coin, not the holder
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
No, again after cracking the coin out of the slab, all liability passed to me.
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Here’s an even tougher one. What about the embossed mint marks on Buffalo Nickels? The main way to catch those is to spot the anomaly on the edge where the embossing tool was inserted to push up the fake mint mark. BUT you can’t see the anomaly because the coin is in a slab.
SO I guess it’s OK for slab companies to certify fake coins so long they can hide the diagnostics in the slab? Do you guys really believe that?
The “It’s out the holder; it’s YOUR problem,” answer is not nearly as simple as it sounds. AND if this sort of thing because more wide-spread, the value of the that slab you have could be considerably diminished.
Edited to say I would resubmit and hope for the best.
CG
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
For the seller, the situation is different. I would think he was indeed liable if 1) he admits he sold the coin, or 2) the buyer can prove that this is the coin he purchased from the seller. In either case, I wouldn't think it matters whether the seller knew that the coin was altered. A similar chain of responsibity would lilkey apply if the coin, for example, had been stolen.
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain
Newmismatist
Good question. While you're at it, consider a similar scenario in which the coin is sitting in a third world slab.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.